Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for The GeoSight

Channel

The GeoSight

@GeoSight

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

21,040subscribers

-11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002419144068
TypeChannel
Username@GeoSight
DescriptionBoost Us: https://t.me/boost/GeoSight Contact: @GeoSight_XBoT The GeoSight shares updates and analysis on global conflicts and international relations. It covers breaking news and insights into military and geopolitical events.
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/GeoSight

Growth

21,03421,12021,0776 August 2026 — 21,051 subscribers6 August 2026 — 21,097 subscribers7 August 2026 — 21,109 subscribers8 August 2026 — 21,113 subscribers9 August 2026 — 21,120 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21,119 subscribers12 August 2026 — 21,101 subscribers13 August 2026 — 21,089 subscribers16 August 2026 — 21,066 subscribers17 August 2026 — 21,049 subscribers18 August 2026 — 21,051 subscribers19 August 2026 — 21,055 subscribers20 August 2026 — 21,049 subscribers21 August 2026 — 21,053 subscribers22 August 2026 — 21,077 subscribers24 August 2026 — 21,056 subscribers25 August 2026 — 21,059 subscribers26 August 2026 — 21,051 subscribers27 August 2026 — 21,038 subscribers28 August 2026 — 21,042 subscribers29 August 2026 — 21,060 subscribers30 August 2026 — 21,044 subscribers1 September 2026 — 21,034 subscribers2 September 2026 — 21,040 subscribers21,0406 August 20262 September 2026
24 measurements spanning 27 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,021–21,133 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 10:2921,040+6
1 Sept 2026, 07:3721,034-10
30 Aug 2026, 12:3821,044-16
29 Aug 2026, 12:1321,060+18
28 Aug 2026, 11:3421,042+4
27 Aug 2026, 10:0721,038-13
26 Aug 2026, 12:1621,051-8
25 Aug 2026, 14:3521,059+3
24 Aug 2026, 11:1821,056-21
22 Aug 2026, 17:2821,077+24
21 Aug 2026, 09:5821,053+4
20 Aug 2026, 12:5521,049-6
19 Aug 2026, 14:3821,055+4
18 Aug 2026, 18:0621,051+2
17 Aug 2026, 19:3521,049-17
16 Aug 2026, 17:2221,066-23
13 Aug 2026, 17:1621,089-12
12 Aug 2026, 14:1421,101-18
11 Aug 2026, 13:3421,119-1
9 Aug 2026, 12:0121,120first reading

Engagement

357 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.74%
avg views ÷ 21,040 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,630
354 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
354
of 357 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held357 (3 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total576,657
Reactions total14,511
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 11:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
8,380
Videos
4,380
Links
767

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
40m 31s
Average length
44s

Measured directly from 55 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

14,024 reactions across 341 posts, in 41 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣4,90034.9%
🔥2,60118.5%
1,77412.6%
🤡1,72012.3%
👍4853.46%
💯3022.15%
🤯2972.12%
😁2892.06%
🤬2361.68%
👏2301.64%
🙏1821.30%
👀1471.05%
🥰1150.82%
😱880.627%
🤔700.499%
👎670.478%
🍾630.449%
💔590.421%
500.357%
🌚480.342%
21 further kinds3012.15%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 357 of the 357 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,616 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 357 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 11:08 UTC358 views15 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

✈️ A plane crashed in a cornfield in China. Preliminary reports suggest it was a J-10 fighter jet belonging to the People's Liberation Army Air Force.

😁13👍2

2 Sept 2026, 09:36 UTC657 views20 reactionsread 2 September 2026

US treasure Secretary Scott Bessent compares US SANCTIONS ON IRAN to cutting off the head of SNAKE.

🤣19🤡1

Signed The Mesmerizer

2 Sept 2026, 07:46 UTC882 views25 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Russia's Medvedev on Germany: They deserve a direct strike against all German military production facilities intended for the Banderite clique. And quite possibly, against some other locations in Berlin as well.

🔥202🤡2👍1

2 Sept 2026, 06:08 UTC≈1,050 views26 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

External Affairs Minister of India S. Jaishankar will visit Ukraine and Poland from September 3 to 5, 2026

🔥242

Signed ₹avi

2 Sept 2026, 01:19 UTC≈1,380 views39 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Solar Surpasses Coal as China’s Top Source of Power Capacity.

🤯24👍7👀4👏2🕊1🤔1

Signed The Mesmerizer

2 Sept 2026, 01:11 UTC≈1,370 views54 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Florida Governor Desantis: I signed a bill banning Sharia Law in Florida. We have officially designated the Muslim Brotherhood as a Foreign terrorist Organisation(FTO). CAIR and ANTIFA

🔥45🤡5🤔3🥰1

Signed The Mesmerizer

1 Sept 2026, 17:04 UTC≈1,610 views28 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Claim by a U.S. official: U.S. attacks on Iran have so far been carried out using a combination of fighter jets, drones, and Tomahawk cruise missiles.

🔥21🤡51🥰1

Signed The Mesmerizer

1 Sept 2026, 17:03 UTC≈1,540 views20 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Some sources report that Iranian missiles were fired towards American bases in the region.

15🔥5

Signed The Mesmerizer

1 Sept 2026, 17:03 UTC≈1,520 views17 reactionsread 2 September 2026

🇺🇸🆚🇮🇷 US⚔️IRAN

👏12🔥5

Signed The Mesmerizer

1 Sept 2026, 17:01 UTC≈1,340 views8 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @rybar_in_english

📝Many cruise missiles📝 but little countermeasures The "Shock August" in Kyiv forced Western media to actively debate Russian attacks. And what causes even more concern is not ballistics or other missile weapons, but the Geran drones, which in their cruise missile version have become unreachable for Ukrainian air defense. Against this backdrop, it's no surprise that so-called Ukraine is crying out loud and asking fo

8

Signed The Mesmerizer

1 Sept 2026, 13:56 UTC≈1,460 views38 reactionsread 2 September 2026

US TREASURY SECRETARY BESSENT: THE STRAIT OF HORMUZ WILL BE BYPASSED IN 2 YEARS, AND WILL BECOME A WORTHLESS PIECE OF WATER.

🤡25🤣94

1 Sept 2026, 11:46 UTC≈1,510 views64 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @isnreportVideo

🇵🇰 Interesting moment at the SCO Summit At the SCO Heads of State Meeting, Pakistan PM Shehbaz Sharif defended the recently signed Makkah Joint Defence Agreement, stressing that it is “not aimed at any state” and is purely defensive. He also called for water treaties to be honoured “unconditionally”, without directly naming the Indus Waters Treaty, which India has kept in abeyance. Join For More Updates : @ISNRepo

🤣52🤡93

Showing the 12 most recent of 357 posts we hold for @GeoSight. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 57,244 of 1,629,571 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“The GeoSight” (@GeoSight), 21,040 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GeoSight.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.