खान सर जैसों का फ्री एजुकेशन मॉडल - समाजसेवा या करोड़ों का कारोबार! @GayatriTAM with Dr Avinash Singh
❤1
Signed Rising_Sun

Channel
@AlternateMedia_GayatriDevi
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,210subscribers
-41 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001535187049 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AlternateMedia_GayatriDevi |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AlternateMedia_GayatriDevi |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 10:00 | 7,210 | +7 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 18:59 | 7,203 | -18 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 22:41 | 7,221 | -22 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 02:20 | 7,243 | -4 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:33 | 7,247 | +15 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:49 | 7,232 | +6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 7,226 | -13 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 22:37 | 7,239 | +3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:07 | 7,236 | -7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 7,243 | -8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:31 | 7,251 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:21 | 7,251 | first reading |
158 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 158 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 131 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4,305 reactions across 151 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,042 | 24.2% | |
| 😡 | 981 | 22.8% | |
| 🤣 | 892 | 20.7% | |
| 👍 | 625 | 14.5% | |
| ⚡ | 270 | 6.27% | |
| 👏 | 251 | 5.83% | |
| 👀 | 72 | 1.67% | |
| 💯 | 54 | 1.25% | |
| 🤔 | 50 | 1.16% | |
| ✍ | 32 | 0.743% | |
| 🙉 | 14 | 0.325% | |
| 🥰 | 12 | 0.279% | |
| 🆒 | 3 | 0.07% | |
| 🙈 | 2 | 0.046% | |
| 🙊 | 2 | 0.046% | |
| 🤗 | 1 | 0.023% | |
| 🦄 | 1 | 0.023% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 0.023% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 151 of the 158 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,305 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 158 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
खान सर जैसों का फ्री एजुकेशन मॉडल - समाजसेवा या करोड़ों का कारोबार! @GayatriTAM with Dr Avinash Singh
❤1
Signed Rising_Sun
शरद पवार का PM मोदी! @GayatriTAM @ashutoshpkanak
✍3
Signed Rising_Sun
Ouchhhhh....BJP IT Cell is on Fire with Dimagi Naxal!
❤11👏5
Signed Rising_Sun
😂 ABHIJEET DIPKE’S “SCHOOL INSPECTION” TAKES ANOTHER TURN! Went to “expose” a Maharashtra school, found a clean, freshly painted toilet- and apparently the paint became the problem. 😂 Then came the photo of an abandoned toilet outside the school’s premises. When there’s no scandal to find, apparently you have to manufacture one.
🤣12😡5❤1
Signed Rising_Sun
निवेश के लिए सोने के आभूषण खरीदना एक बड़ी गलती! @GayatriTAM @centarii
Signed Rising_Sun
🚨 DELHI’S “EDUCATION REVOLUTION” - WHAT HAPPENED TO THIS SCHOOL? Swati Maliwal says a Delhi government school inaugurated by Arvind Kejriwal in 2020 was declared dangerous within 2–3 years. She says slabs fell near children and questions how a newly built school deteriorated so quickly. CJP should question its Super Boss Arvind Kejriwal on this too..
❤19😡3👍2
Signed Rising_Sun
🚨 CONFIDENCE LEVEL: NEXT LEVEL. A CJP-linked Maulana reportedly entered a government school with supporters and allegedly threatened the principal with consequences. Will he show the same courage when it comes to raising questions about madrassas- or are government schools the only target? Cockroaches need a good belt treatment from government.
💯13😡6
Signed Rising_Sun
🚨 AMIT SHAH’S QUESTION DESERVES AN ANSWER. If Congress objects to the full Vande Mataram because of its religious imagery, will it apply the same standard to state songs? 🇮🇳 Karnataka: references Ram, Krishna, the Vedas, Kapila & Patanjali 🇮🇳 Tamil Nadu: personifies Tamil as “Tamil Thai” 🇮🇳 Andhra Pradesh: invokes “Mother Telugu” and celebrates historical rulers Will Congress demand those songs be shortened too- o…
❤16👏8⚡1
Signed Rising_Sun
शाह ने खोली दीपके की Crime File! शहजाद भट्टी & दाऊद का CJP Connection! RAW NIA को मिला Free Hand! @GayatriTAM @col_chaubey https://www.youtube.com/live/cUK8DB0Sqv0?si=fcayAnPG3NRSnMsI
👍6
Signed Rising_Sun
We are GenZ Saar.... We don't tolerate Saar....😂
🤣28😡6🙉1
Signed Rising_Sun
राघव चड्ढा और संदीप पाठक दोनों ने छोड़ दिया केजरी
👍14
Signed Rising_Sun
😂😂
🤣29❤2👀1
Signed Rising_Sun
Showing the 12 most recent of 158 posts we hold for @AlternateMedia_GayatriDevi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@AlternateMedia_GayatriDevi named 8 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Alternate Media_Gayatri Devi” (@AlternateMedia_GayatriDevi), 7,210 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AlternateMedia_GayatriDevi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.