Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for База from Olga

Channel

База from Olga

@BazaFromOlga

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,713subscribers

+69 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002044710055
TypeChannel
Username@BazaFromOlga
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/BazaFromOlga

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

6,550 average views per post against 5,719 subscribers — an engagement rate of 114.6%. Across the 4,128 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,186–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in English — the middle half sit between 2.99% and 17.7%, with a median of 7.76%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured12 of 12 published in the window (0 exact, 12 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled78,620
Mature posts only114.6% over 12 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers5,719 measured 3 November 2026
Cohortb3162:eng · 4,128 channels · p10 0.941% · p25 2.99% · p50 7.76% · p75 17.7% · p90 30.3%
Position in cohort99.564th percentile · 14.8× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.073% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageEnglish · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

5,6445,7515,697.56 August 2026 — 5,644 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,644 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,658 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,704 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,699 subscribers20 August 2026 — 5,692 subscribers23 August 2026 — 5,693 subscribers26 August 2026 — 5,701 subscribers29 August 2026 — 5,714 subscribers1 September 2026 — 5,716 subscribers4 September 2026 — 5,751 subscribers9 September 2026 — 5,747 subscribers13 September 2026 — 5,737 subscribers16 September 2026 — 5,744 subscribers1 October 2026 — 5,735 subscribers7 October 2026 — 5,741 subscribers13 October 2026 — 5,739 subscribers16 October 2026 — 5,746 subscribers19 October 2026 — 5,741 subscribers22 October 2026 — 5,738 subscribers25 October 2026 — 5,740 subscribers28 October 2026 — 5,733 subscribers31 October 2026 — 5,723 subscribers3 November 2026 — 5,719 subscribers6 November 2026 — 5,713 subscribers5,7136 August 20266 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 93 days, net +69. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,628–5,767 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 16:365,713-6
3 Nov 2026, 15:065,719-4
31 Oct 2026, 09:015,723-10
28 Oct 2026, 01:275,733-7
25 Oct 2026, 07:105,740+2
22 Oct 2026, 11:575,738-3
19 Oct 2026, 05:575,741-5
16 Oct 2026, 08:075,746+7
13 Oct 2026, 15:305,739-2
7 Oct 2026, 17:165,741+6
1 Oct 2026, 01:405,735-9
16 Sept 2026, 15:555,744+7
13 Sept 2026, 00:215,737-10
9 Sept 2026, 04:185,747-4
4 Sept 2026, 03:575,751+35
1 Sept 2026, 00:285,716+2
29 Aug 2026, 08:085,714+13
26 Aug 2026, 11:065,701+8
23 Aug 2026, 04:035,693+1
20 Aug 2026, 02:435,692first reading

Engagement

56 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
129.3%
avg views ÷ 5,713 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,390
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.22%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 56 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 October 2026
Posts held56 (31 July 2026 – 31 October 2026)
Views total73,860
Reactions total900
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 19:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
14m 08s
Average length
57s

Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,070 reactions across 46 posts, in 35 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣1,14737.4%
😁88728.9%
💯31110.1%
🤬1565.08%
🤮1053.42%
❤902.93%
👍802.61%
🤡622.02%
😢581.89%
🥰501.63%
🔥250.814%
👏190.619%
🖕130.423%
🙈110.358%
🎉70.228%
😡60.195%
😭60.195%
🗿40.13%
🤯40.13%
🤷‍♂40.13%
15 further kinds250.814%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 56 of the 56 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,594 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 31 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 10 posts held from the last 30 days (10.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

30 Oct 2026, 09:27 UTC≈1,170 views55 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Can't stop laughing about this. @BazaFromOlga

🤣48😁5👍1🥱1

20 Oct 2026, 17:14 UTC≈3,160 views123 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Hello, котики. From here on now, this channel is going to become a meme and political satire only channel. Thank you for your attention to this matter. @BazaFromOlga

😁80🤣20👏11🎉7👍4🔥1

18 Oct 2026, 09:12 UTC≈3,990 views67 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

@BazaFromOlga

😁23❤20💯8🔥8👍3🤣3👏1🤷‍♂1

14 Oct 2026, 17:50 UTC≈38,300 views112 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

‼️BREAKING: Pro-Ukrainian bot activity on social media has plummeted after Elon Musk imposed speed restrictions on Starlink terminals over Ukraine. @BazaFromOlga

🤣69😁38👍2🤡2❤1

9 Oct 2026, 18:45 UTC≈3,530 views168 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

@BazaFromOlga

🤣129😁24💯14👍1

9 Oct 2026, 18:27 UTC≈16,000 views77 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

@BazaFromOlga

🤣53😁20👌3👍1

8 Oct 2026, 14:28 UTC≈2,550 views101 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video

Somewhere in the EU...

🤣86😁7❤5👍1💯1🔥1

6 Oct 2026, 13:01 UTC≈2,210 views94 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video

The "Bucha Massacre" became the much needed centrepiece of a Western campaign to demonise Russia, it even accelerated massive sanctions against Moscow But new evidence shows that many "murdered civilians" listed as killed there, were Ukrainian soldiers killed in action far away Follow me on X, IG, TT

💯82🤬9❤2👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @BazaFromOlga. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 23 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

🇷🇺☦️ Russian БaZa ☦️🇷🇺
@RussianBaZa · 20,597
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 28 September 2026
Dmitry Medvedev
@medvedev_telegramE · 40,051
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 30 August 2026
Dan Kovalik
@danielmkovalik · 38,881
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 1 September 2026
Pepe Escobar
@rocknrollgeopolitics · 66,070
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
Eurasia & Multipolarity
@EurasianChoice · 23,668
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 17 September 2026
Ukraine Watch
@ukraine_watch · 69,148
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 20 August 2026
Slavyangrad
@Slavyangrad · 111,692
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 August 2026
DD Geopolitics
@DDGeopolitics · 189,984
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
Node of Time EN
@node_of_time_en · 19,854
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 30 September 2026
The Islander
@TheIslanderNews · 61,638
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 August 2026
InfoDefenseENGLISH
@infodefENGLAND · 50,404
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 August 2026
Fearless John - @European_dissident
@European_dissident · 69,283
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
Geopolitics Prime
@geopolitics_prime · 289,113
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
🇦🇺AussieCossack🇷🇺
@AussieCossack · 70,708
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 20 August 2026
Victor vicktop55
@vicktop55 · 26,875
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 September 2026
Russians With Attitude
@rwapodcast · 36,219
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 1 September 2026
UKR LEAKS_eng
@ukr_leaks_eng · 75,032
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 August 2026
The Right People Z
@the_Right_People · 36,816
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 2 September 2026
Russian Diplomat 🅉
@R_Diplomat · 19,802
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 28 September 2026
Kremlin. News
@news_kremlin_eng · 26,804
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 September 2026
Suriyakmaps
@Suriyak_maps · 48,091
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 27 August 2026
Alexander Dugin
@Dugin_Aleksandr · 22,319
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 20 September 2026
Jackson Hinkle
@jacksonhinkle · 33,227
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 3 September 2026
SITREP - Independent OSINT Channel
@sitreports · 22,874
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 September 2026

This channel appears in 48 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“База from Olga” (@BazaFromOlga), 5,713 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BazaFromOlga.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.