Channel
@BazaFromOlga
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,744subscribers
+100 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002044710055 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BazaFromOlga |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BazaFromOlga |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 15:55 | 5,744 | +7 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 00:21 | 5,737 | -10 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 04:18 | 5,747 | -4 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 03:57 | 5,751 | +35 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:28 | 5,716 | +2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 08:08 | 5,714 | +13 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 11:06 | 5,701 | +8 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 04:03 | 5,693 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 02:43 | 5,692 | -7 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 10:36 | 5,699 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:20 | 5,704 | +46 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:10 | 5,658 | +14 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:34 | 5,644 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:31 | 5,644 | first reading |
37 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 37 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,307 reactions across 27 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 494 | 37.8% | |
| 🤣 | 243 | 18.6% | |
| 💯 | 132 | 10.1% | |
| 🤬 | 132 | 10.1% | |
| 🤮 | 105 | 8.03% | |
| 🤡 | 53 | 4.06% | |
| 🥰 | 50 | 3.83% | |
| ❤ | 34 | 2.60% | |
| 🖕 | 13 | 0.995% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 0.842% | |
| 🙈 | 11 | 0.842% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 0.612% | |
| 😡 | 6 | 0.459% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 0.23% | |
| 🤷♂ | 3 | 0.23% | |
| 💅 | 2 | 0.153% | |
| 🤪 | 2 | 0.153% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 0.077% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.077% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.077% | |
| 2 further kinds | 2 | 0.153% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,831 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
In 2017 survey conducted by the Innovation Center for U.S. Dairy on 1,000 adults, 7% of respondents selected brown cows as the source for chocolate milk, which extrapolates to roughly 16.4 million Americans based on current US population. One has to wonder, where do so many Americans think fruit flavored milk comes from. These people also can vote. @BazaFromOlga
😁32🤣7
"Mad Mykola: Potuzhnost Road" @BazaFromOlga
🙈11🤮6🤡4🤣1
‼️ EXCLUSIVE: "Before leaving Russia, on the way back home, take Baltics, so we don't have to come back again," Kim Jong Un addressed his troops before deployment to Russia. @BazaFromOlga
😁37🥰17🔥2👾1🤣1
Notice how quickly Laura Loomer stopped posting about Ukraine and reverted back to her beloved anti-Islam pro-Zionist talking points. Most ardent 🇺🇦 stans, who she hoped to gain as the new audience, didn't trust her turnaround, and the Ukrainian topic simply didn't track, even with her retarded audience. Advocating for war against Iran and belching out pro-Israel agitprop simply bring more clicks. She's a click wh…
😁24💯9🤬2💅1🤮1
There are thousands of videos of Ukrainian men being violently beaten up and snatched from the streets by Zelensky's recruitment gangs. There is still not a single legitimate video of anything remotely close occuring in Russia. Meanwhile FT:
🤡37💯3🤯1
Vučić stated that he did not side with Zelenskyy after his visit to Serbia. @BazaFromOlga
😁38
It's worth noting, that triumphant shouts in Western media about 'Ukraine turning the tide of war' have somehow imperceptibly changed into plaintive whimpers that Russia is barbarically destroying Ukraine with missiles, and Ukraine has nothing to counter it with. @BazaFromOlga
😁20👍4🤷♂3
This is the visualisation of strikes against Odessa from two days ago. In retrospect, attempting to assassinate the commander of the Russian Aerospace Forces without having any air defense interceptors, a man responsible for the entire lethal arsenal with great destruction potential, the terrorist attack in which Ukraine murdered his son-in-law, and injured his daughter, must have been one of the dumbest decisions Z…
💯20👍1🔥1
This went under the radar, because Michael Martens doesn't have a big following on X, but apparently he has been salivating about killing Russians for some time. He enjoys watching war porn in his free time. @BazaFromOlga
🤬31🤮6
The Kremlin is in shambles. Latvia finally found how to counter Russian ballistic missiles. @BazaFromOlga
😁30🤣4
🇺🇦 stans keep celebrating all the great looking fires that Ukraine has created by attacking Wildberries. Amongst things they celebrate is the amount of people who lose their jobs at these warehouses. The largest Wildberries in Russia employed 200 workers, cheap labor migrants. Now, for the scale of asymmetry of the losses this single German enterprise that got destroyed today, employed 3500 people. Do you think it'…
💯29🔥2
Sorry, this had to be done sooner or later. Donald Meowmp @BazaFromOlga
😁30🤣20
Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @BazaFromOlga. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 22 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 43 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“База from Olga” (@BazaFromOlga), 5,744 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BazaFromOlga.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.