16 measurements spanning 16 days, net -122. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 31,389–31,572 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
21 Aug 2026, 21:58
31,410
-20
20 Aug 2026, 16:48
31,430
-12
19 Aug 2026, 16:53
31,442
-13
18 Aug 2026, 16:12
31,455
-13
17 Aug 2026, 19:27
31,468
-14
16 Aug 2026, 18:06
31,482
-13
15 Aug 2026, 05:45
31,495
-7
13 Aug 2026, 23:55
31,502
-9
12 Aug 2026, 19:04
31,511
-13
11 Aug 2026, 20:02
31,524
-15
10 Aug 2026, 17:11
31,539
-3
9 Aug 2026, 17:42
31,542
-9
8 Aug 2026, 14:03
31,551
+14
7 Aug 2026, 17:31
31,537
+9
6 Aug 2026, 17:35
31,528
-4
6 Aug 2026, 07:04
31,532
first reading
Engagement
59 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.58%
avg views ÷ 31,410 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,010
59 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.25%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
59
of 59 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026
Posts held
59 (5 August 2026 – 21 August 2026)
Views total
177,460
Reactions total
7,547
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Aug 2026, 05:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈8,740
Videos
≈4,870
Links
≈10,400
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
4m 28s
Average length
22s
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7,437 reactions across 58 posts, in 51 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,483
19.9%
🤬
1,434
19.3%
🤡
932
12.5%
👏
727
9.78%
❤
615
8.27%
🔥
469
6.31%
💯
324
4.36%
😁
322
4.33%
🤣
249
3.35%
🤔
172
2.31%
🙏
115
1.55%
🫡
77
1.04%
👀
70
0.941%
🥴
54
0.726%
🤯
50
0.672%
🤷♂
42
0.565%
😱
34
0.457%
💊
32
0.43%
🤪
30
0.403%
😡
28
0.376%
31 further kinds
178
2.39%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 59 of the 59 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,547reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 59 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ForeignAgentIntel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 59 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 21 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
📝Draining money📝
under the guise of AFU aid
Amid Britain's sponsorship of the "Ukrainian" military machine, many might think this only benefits politicians on the Foggy Albion, but that's not the case. The multimillion-dollar contracts that defense enterprises are now concluding serve only the interests of certain elites.
🖍And by them, one should not understand the government or some bureaucrat. The weapons lobby a…
Russian "loitering" drones are no longer just equipped with 4K cameras, but also with microphones. In the video, the drone rises from its concealed position, triggered by the sound of passing vehicles.
Very soon, all of these platforms will be automated and autonomous, powered by AI. This will be a terrifying weapon.
t.me/ForeignAgentIntel
🚨 Germany’s Yacht Story Is Taking on Water, read Freddie Ponton's new investigation… ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️
💥 New evidence also emerges about a mysterious boat implicated in spoiling the crime scene soon after the explosions.
🟠 Nord Stream Trials: Problems Appear in Germany’s Andromeda Story - READ MORE: https://21stcenturywire.com/2026/08/14/nord-stream-trials-problems-appear-germanys-andromeda-story/
Estonian customs officials prevented a sanctioned frying pan from entering Russia.
At the "Narva" border crossing, a 39-year-old Finnish citizen was found to have a new aluminum frying pan in her luggage, which is prohibited from import under sanctions.
The woman was fined €560 and, along with the purchase, was sent back to Estonia.
t.me/ForeignAgentIntel
69 people, including three children, have been killed, and 406 have been injured as a result of attacks by the Ukrainian Armed Forces on Russian regions from August 10th to 16th – Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
On average, during this period, approximately 10 people were killed each day, and around 60 were injured.
t.me/ForeignAgentIntel
Former UK Labour Party MP, founder and leader of the Workers Party, George Galloway, stated on his show MOATS Deep Dive that the British are requesting the restoration of a military "hotline" between London and Moscow because Russian Geran drones are now "shaping the battlefield" in modern conflicts:
"The geran appears to be the preeminent predominant weapon which is now shaping a battlefield which has turned rapidl…
Russia has created "secret bases" for launching drones against Ukraine.
According to the newspaper The Telegraph, these are a network of hidden bases for strikes using modern, long-range drones. Some of them are already being used to attack targets in Ukraine, and they are also capable of striking deep into NATO territory, the British publication claims.
Journalists claim that they have identified ten facilities wi…
A British volunteer’s journey into the Russian Armed Forces didn’t begin with a uniform, an oath or a training ground.
It began with a train to Veliky Novgorod.
Before Michael Jones joined the 61st Marine Brigade, he was welcomed into the home and family of the Guards lieutenant known by the call sign “Politruk.” Over two days, he saw a side of Russia that no official document could explain — the Novgorod Kremlin, …
British drones were used for the first time to strike deep inside Russia, according to The Sunday Times, citing sources in the Ukrainian Armed Forces.
According to the publication, drones manufactured in Britain, including the Nyan model from Callen-Lenz, were used in attacks on oil refineries in Volgograd and Yaroslavl.
t.me/ForeignAgentIntel
North Korean IT specialists are earning hundreds of millions of dollars in the American tech sector – WSJ.
According to investigators and the U.S. Department of Justice, thousands of North Korean programmers are secretly employed by American companies, using stolen identities and deepfakes. In the U.S., accomplices create "laptop farms" to conceal the actual location of the workers.
Some specialists work for multip…
In July, 201 civilians in Russia were killed as a result of attacks by Ukrainian drones.
Another 1739 people were injured – this is the highest number in the past two years, according to a report by the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
t.me/ForeignAgentIntel
🤬165🙏25😱7🤷♂4😢3❤2🕊2🆒1
Showing the 12 most recent of 59 posts we hold for @ForeignAgentIntel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 117,921 of 1,581,209entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Intel Republic @Intel_Republic12 · 98,791 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 August 2026
Geopolitics Prime | Iran & Ukraine News Updates @geopolitics_prime · 294,545 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
Fearless John - @European_dissident @European_dissident · 70,879 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
Lord Bebo & Friends @myLordBebo · 73,228 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 August 2026
Grandmasters of Geopolitics @geo_grandmasters · 75,103 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 August 2026
Intel Slava @intelslava · 394,175 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
Scott Ritter @ScottRitter · 87,575 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 August 2026
DD Geopolitics @DDGeopolitics · 191,299 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
🇦🇺AussieCossack🇷🇺 @AussieCossack · 70,425 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 20 August 2026
Pepe Escobar @rocknrollgeopolitics · 66,825 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
MoD Russia @mod_russia_en · 95,290 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 16 August 2026
Ukraine Watch @ukraine_watch · 68,867 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 20 August 2026
Military Summary @militarysummary · 77,320 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 19 August 2026
Slavyangrad @Slavyangrad · 113,905 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 August 2026
🔰 Militär-News @militaernews · 66,299 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 21 August 2026
Mediterranean Man @medmannews · 77,090 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 August 2026
Rybar in English @rybar_in_english · 79,902 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 18 August 2026
The Islander @TheIslanderNews · 62,026 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 August 2026
UKR LEAKS_eng @ukr_leaks_eng · 75,746 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 August 2026
Press TV @presstv · 93,608 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 16 August 2026
Robin Monotti @robinmg · 68,830 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Hacker News
This handle was named once in a Hacker News comment or story, via the public Algolia search API. HN comment and story text has no confirmed reuse licence, so nothing quoted from either is reproduced here — only that a mention exists, when, and by whom, with a link to read it at the source.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Foreign Agent Intel” (@ForeignAgentIntel), 31,410 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ForeignAgentIntel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.