For US election news & daily such updates follow the VidurNeeti X account @VidurNeetiX at- https://x.com/vidurneetiX VidurNeeti.
๐20โค12๐3๐ค2๐1

Channel
@VidurNeeti
On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry
10,570subscribers
+18 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 10,000โ31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001735528503 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @VidurNeeti |
| Description | So we fix our eyes not on what is seen, but on what is unseen |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 57 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/VidurNeeti |
Politics & activism โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 01:54 | 10,570 | +3 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 23:57 | 10,567 | -7 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 23:47 | 10,574 | +4 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 22:28 | 10,570 | -1 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 19:17 | 10,571 | -3 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 17:29 | 10,574 | +9 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 15:27 | 10,565 | -4 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 12:00 | 10,569 | -1 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 11:36 | 10,570 | -3 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 11:09 | 10,573 | -4 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 12:09 | 10,577 | -1 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 15:41 | 10,578 | -2 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 18:36 | 10,580 | +1 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 16:55 | 10,579 | +13 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 15:28 | 10,566 | +22 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 18:17 | 10,544 | +13 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 07:59 | 10,531 | +1 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 05:18 | 10,530 | +11 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 04:37 | 10,519 | -1 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 01:29 | 10,520 | first reading |
40 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 40 (27 July 2026 โ 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 25,140 |
| Reactions total | 555 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 08:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 7 November 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
3,884 reactions across 40 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โค | 1,199 | 30.9% | |
| ๐ฏ | 1,021 | 26.3% | |
| ๐ฅ | 305 | 7.85% | |
| โ | 243 | 6.26% | |
| ๐ | 215 | 5.54% | |
| ๐ | 172 | 4.43% | |
| ๐คฏ | 166 | 4.27% | |
| ๐ค | 107 | 2.75% | |
| ๐ | 89 | 2.29% | |
| ๐ข | 72 | 1.85% | |
| ๐ซก | 70 | 1.80% | |
| ๐ | 61 | 1.57% | |
| ๐ | 25 | 0.644% | |
| ๐ฑ | 25 | 0.644% | |
| ๐ค | 15 | 0.386% | |
| ๐คฉ | 15 | 0.386% | |
| ๐จ | 14 | 0.36% | |
| ๐จโ๐ป | 11 | 0.283% | |
| โก | 10 | 0.257% | |
| ๐ | 7 | 0.18% | |
| 9 further kinds | 42 | 1.08% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 3,884 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegramโs own โeditedโ marker: 0 of 5 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before โ this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
For US election news & daily such updates follow the VidurNeeti X account @VidurNeetiX at- https://x.com/vidurneetiX VidurNeeti.
๐20โค12๐3๐ค2๐1
New Airfare Rules in India from January 1, 2027. Read last two points. https://x.com/IndianTechGuide/status/2117202628585132454 Now you can relate to this news: https://x.com/IndianGems_/status/2117138142402842759 You know which conglomerate is getting into this business big time & already has substantial presence. That's how ecosystem works. ===== To the ever-nagging Common Man, simple solution: Please donโt trโฆ
๐ฅ43๐ฏ16โค11โ4๐3๐ค3๐ฑ3๐คฏ2
Nandan Nilekani, PM's appointee on the high-powered committee on exam reforms pin-points to the exact same problem & solution as was highlighted by VidurNeeti 4 months back. VN got a lot of flak & unfollows for saying this then, but as always what was said, happened. Our task is to always keep you ahead of news. https://x.com/ANI/status/2109913464152248362
๐ฏ81โค19๐5๐4๐4๐ฅ3๐ค2๐คจ1
Happened exactly as said- https://x.com/ShivAroor/status/2109556829827264643 Follow VidurNeeti. We don't report news, we tell you what will happen.
๐ฅ89โค22๐7๐5๐2โ1โคโ๐ฅ1
Rahul & Rubbish both did a u-turn. US comes down heavily on H1B. CJP calls for next round of street protests. Influencers from abroad fly-in. All the above are interlinked & are being done keeping Oct. 10 protests at Jantar-Mantar in mind. VidurNeeti has been critical of government for failing to demolish opponent's ecosystem & inability to create their own. All they did in 12 years was hero-worshipping. Now enjoy โฆ
โค122๐ฏ51๐4โ3๐3๐ค1
See these below two tweets first: 1. https://x.com/ashokgehlot51/status/2107819143588438193 2. https://x.com/AadeshRawal/status/2107816419698303418 Was this even needed? Unnecessarily making Rahul-Priyanka a hero. No lessons learnt from the high-handedness shown at CJP protests at Jantar-Mantar last time that caused a loss of face for PM, demolishing all the good work done over a decade to bring Gen-z on his side,โฆ
โ26๐ฏ14โค13๐ค13๐3๐ค2๐คฉ2๐ฑ2
Inflation is just 5%. Prices are under control. Economy is booming, see car sales figures. It's futile to now even track how every step of the common man has been gated which unlocks only if a price is paid. VidurNeeti.
โค55๐ค18๐ข10โ9๐ฏ4๐1๐1
Photo, posted without a caption
โ17๐ฏ13๐2
Photo, posted without a caption
๐คฏ11๐ฑ4๐1
Photo, posted without a caption
๐ฑ8๐คฏ2๐1
Had said that Ethanol effect will not just make your petrol costly but your food plate whether you are vegetarian or non-vegetarian. Presenting food items that have gone costly since start of the year 2026 till August 2026. None are related to Ethanol, everything is due to El-Nino, Iran conflict, or some or the other global reasons. In short, if everything is beyond control, why have all these petroleum, food, & hosโฆ
๐คฏ19โ7โค3๐ฏ3๐ฑ3๐1๐ค1
When Kasab fires in Mumbai he doesn't see which language you speak. When Pahalgam happens, they don't see which state you came from or your caste. But you will never learn, never unite. In post above had explained you are facing a much bigger existential threat : birth-rates. You didn't like it, unfollowed the channel. We were going to reach 11k but have now dropped to 10.4k. This is a victory & we are thankful to yโฆ
โค133๐20๐ฅ18๐ฏ9โก4๐ค2๐1๐ฆ1
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @VidurNeeti. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollโs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
According to the latest Unified District Information System for Education Plus (UDISE+) 2025-26 data released by the Ministry of Education, exactly how many schools in India are operating with only a single teacher?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only โ there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionโs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 2 registered channels โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโs list for THAT channel, not this one โ see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โVidurNeeti ๐ฎ๐ณโ (@VidurNeeti), 10,570 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VidurNeeti.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.