🇪🇸🌐Análisis de geopolítica y seguimiento de conflictos independiente.
ADVERTISING/ PUBLI: @entre_guerras_admin
Check our ADS rates in the pinned message.
Nuestro Instagram y más:
https://linktr.ee/entre_guerras
Created
26 October 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
60 measurements spanning 92 days, net -2,635. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 134,888–138,313 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 13:59
135,283
-36
5 Nov 2026, 11:21
135,319
-7
4 Nov 2026, 14:27
135,326
+28
3 Nov 2026, 16:31
135,298
+11
2 Nov 2026, 16:11
135,287
-18
1 Nov 2026, 13:29
135,305
-42
31 Oct 2026, 13:38
135,347
-25
30 Oct 2026, 15:21
135,372
-27
29 Oct 2026, 17:40
135,399
-38
28 Oct 2026, 16:06
135,437
-25
27 Oct 2026, 15:19
135,462
-43
26 Oct 2026, 12:18
135,505
-36
25 Oct 2026, 13:46
135,541
-40
24 Oct 2026, 12:49
135,581
-20
23 Oct 2026, 11:45
135,601
-54
22 Oct 2026, 08:49
135,655
-18
21 Oct 2026, 04:19
135,673
-26
20 Oct 2026, 00:39
135,699
-8
19 Oct 2026, 01:47
135,707
-25
17 Oct 2026, 23:04
135,732
first reading
Engagement
2,474 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 190 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.81%
avg views ÷ 135,283 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,800
892 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.40%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
897
of 2,474 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 891 of 892 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
2,474 (4 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
3,387,636
Reactions total
47,400
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 17:37 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈48,700
Videos
≈36,000
Links
≈16,800
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2h 25m
Average length
32s
Measured directly from 274 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
52,510 reactions across 994 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤣
12,481
23.8%
🤬
11,322
21.6%
❤
10,234
19.5%
🔥
4,290
8.17%
👍
3,583
6.82%
👀
2,271
4.32%
🫡
2,175
4.14%
🎉
1,892
3.60%
🗿
1,784
3.40%
😢
1,263
2.41%
😁
774
1.47%
🤯
441
0.84%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 994 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 52,510 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 4 October 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 995 we hold a reading for · 0.4%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @entre_guerras. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 4 October 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 63 of 897 posts held from the last 30 days (7.02%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🇪🇸La policía ha estado durante varias horas en la sede de la entidad en el número 5 de la calle María Tubau, en el barrio madrileño de Las Tablas.
La organización neonazi había organizado para mañana una manifestación que tenía pensada finalizar su recorrido en la sede del PSOE en la calle Ferraz, la cual ha sido desconvocada tras estos sucesos.
🇬🇧The police have spent several hours at the organization’s headquarte…
🇪🇸La Policía Nacional ha detenido este viernes al menos 14 personas pertenecientes a Núcleo Nacional por presunta participación en un delito de odio y un delito de asociación ilícita.
Entre las personas detenidas se encuentra el líder del grupo, Iván Rico.
La operación se ha desarrollando con varios detenidos en Madrid (4 arrestados), Asturias (3), Guadalajara (2), Valladolid (2), Pontevedra (1), Burgos (1) y Alica…
🇷🇺🇺🇦Cuatro bombas FAB con kit UMPK impactaron en un objetivo no precisado, según la imagen difundida por un dron FPV.
🇬🇧 Four FAB bombs with the UMPK kit hit an unspecified target, according to footage captured by an FPV drone.
▫️@ENTRE_GUERRAS▫️
🇮🇷Irán realizó hoy pruebas de misiles desde la base de Isfahán.
🇬🇧 Iran carried out missile tests today from the Isfahan missile base.
▫️@ENTRE_GUERRAS▫️
🇲🇦🇪🇸Morocco praised the police commander identified during the incursion into Ceuta for knowing "when it was better to monitor rather than intervene."
In footage from July 30th showing the mass entry into Ceuta, the General Information Commissariat identified Mohamed El Oualidi and Abdel Fattah El Sayed El Radi—two high-ranking Moroccan security officials—in five of the 73 recovered videos, alongside four other unif…
🇲🇦🇪🇸Marruecos elogió al jefe policial identificado en el asalto a Ceuta por saber "cuándo era mejor vigilar que intervenir"
En las imágenes del 30 de julio sobre la entrada masiva a Ceuta, la Comisaría General de Información identificó a Mohamed El Oualidi y a Abdel Fattah El Sayed El Radi, dos altos mandos de la seguridad marroquí, en cinco de los 73 vídeos localizados, junto a otros cuatro uniformados de la Direcc…
🇺🇸El 4 de noviembre de 2026, un hombre de 35 años identificado como Jacob Pearson embistió con un coche la valla del campus de Citibank, entró en el patio interior con un fusil tipo AR-15 y mató a una empleada del banco que almorzaba al aire libre.
Después avanzó hacia el interior del edificio con 90 cartuchos de reserva, en dirección a una cafetería abarrotada. Allí le salió al paso el guardia armado John Frailey, …
🇺🇸On November 4, 2026, a 35-year-old man identified as Jacob Pearson rammed a car through the fence at Citibank’s campus, entered the inner courtyard with an AR-15-style rifle, and killed a bank employee who was eating lunch outside.
He then moved deeper into the building carrying 90 spare rounds, heading toward a crowded cafeteria. There he was confronted by armed guard John Frailey, a U.S. Marine Corps veteran, wh…
🇬🇧🇷🇺🇺🇦Si haces trading de criptomonedas y te sientes confundido sobre el mercado actual, te recomiendo encarecidamente unirte al grupo que te he recomendado
El grupo comparte a diario el siguiente contenido:
✅ Una señal de trading cada día (con una tasa de acierto de hasta el 85 %)
✅ Actualizaciones en tiempo real sobre las tendencias del mercado de criptomonedas
✅ Asesoramiento técnico de trading personalizado uno …
🇷🇺🇺🇦Un residente de una aldea rusa cercana a la frontera habría ayudado a un operador de un dron FPV ucraniano a orientar el vuelo del aparato, tras lo cual el dron impactó contra un vehículo que transportaba infantería rusa.
El episodio se produjo en la zona fronteriza entre Rusia y Ucrania.
🇬🇧 A resident of a Russian border village reportedly helped a Ukrainian FPV drone operator guide the aircraft, after which t…
🇷🇺🇺🇦Las fuerzas ucranianas habrían intentado un asalto mecanizado en la zona de Lyman con unos 28 sistemas terrestres no tripulados.
Entre los aparatos de la columna de ataque habría habido plataformas equipadas con lanzagranadas RPG, AGS y drones terrestres kamikaze. Las fuerzas rusas afirman que el ataque fue repelido con drones FPV.
🇬🇧 Ukrainian forces reportedly attempted a mechanized assault in the Lyman area …
❤38👀21🔥13🤣7🤬3🗿1
Showing the 12 most recent of 2,474 posts we hold for @entre_guerras. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 4 posts on @entre_guerras as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
27 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
15 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@entre_guerras named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@southcom named in 1 post, 25 August 2026 – 25 August 2026
@globalchannel24 named in 1 post, 21 August 2026 – 21 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Descifrando la Guerra @descifrandolaguerra · 20,735 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 September 2026
⚔️ 𝔄𝔯𝔰 𝔅𝔢𝔩𝔩𝔦 ⚔️ guerra ucrania @Ars_belli · 36,521 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 1 September 2026
⚠️ ARMAPEDIA - NOTICIAS EN VIVO - SIN CENSURA @armapedia · 176,903 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 13 August 2026
Actualidad Oscura @actualidadoscura · 102,754 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 4 September 2026
Noticias UKR 24 @UKR_token · 40,603 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 August 2026
POPULAR FRONT @POPULARXFRONT · 31,067 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 6 September 2026
Ruben Gisbert @rubengisbertoficial · 72,092 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
SPE INFORMACIÓN @SPE112 · 24,546 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 15 September 2026
🔴 ÚLTIMA HORA @ULTIMA_HORA · 36,981 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 1 September 2026
Roberto Vaquero @RobertoVaqueroTelegram · 20,719 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 25 September 2026
Molotov news @soymolotov · 42,349 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 28 August 2026
Herqles @herQles · 47,602 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 26 August 2026
Guerras y Geopolíticas 🚀🔥 @guerrasygeo · 82,718 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 August 2026
AlertaNews24 @AlertaNews24oficial · 34,001 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 3 September 2026
CASOS AISLADOS 2026 @CasosAislados · 19,411 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 1 October 2026
Zulu @Zulucanal · 24,513 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 15 September 2026
Ciudadanos de Uniforme @ciudadanosdeuniforme · 28,882 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 9 September 2026
Alerta Mundial @alertamundialnews · 32,608 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 4 September 2026
POLICE FITNESS @policefitness · 22,092 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 21 September 2026
Forocoches @forocoches_oficial · 41,908 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 29 August 2026
Wofnon @wofnon · 35,244 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026
BcnLgnds @leyendasbcn · 52,223 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 24 August 2026
DENUNCIAS ANTIOQUIA @denunciasantioqu · 131,339 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 4 September 2026
Intel Slava @intelslava · 385,925 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 94 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ENTRE GUERRAS” (@entre_guerras), 135,283 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/entre_guerras.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.