Photo, posted without a caption
🫡18🔥6👍2

Channel
@ciudadanosdeuniforme
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
28,711subscribers
+79 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001214328621 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ciudadanosdeuniforme |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 29 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ciudadanosdeuniforme |
Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 15:22 | 28,711 | +12 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 05:37 | 28,699 | +50 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 23:59 | 28,649 | -5 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:24 | 28,654 | +7 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:02 | 28,647 | +7 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 11:34 | 28,640 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:57 | 28,641 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:43 | 28,643 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 18:28 | 28,645 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:56 | 28,647 | +7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:27 | 28,640 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:35 | 28,641 | -6 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 04:07 | 28,647 | -2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 14:07 | 28,649 | +4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:26 | 28,645 | +5 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:03 | 28,640 | -1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 16:56 | 28,641 | -5 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:04 | 28,646 | -4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:28 | 28,650 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:53 | 28,651 | first reading |
127 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 127 (1 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 775,120 |
| Reactions total | 3,564 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Sept 2026, 05:57 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4,714 reactions across 125 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 2,161 | 45.8% | |
| ❤ | 1,054 | 22.4% | |
| 🫡 | 531 | 11.3% | |
| 👍 | 388 | 8.23% | |
| 👏 | 323 | 6.85% | |
| 🤩 | 188 | 3.99% | |
| 🎉 | 69 | 1.46% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 127 of the 127 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,993 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 127 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ciudadanosdeuniforme. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 127 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Photo, posted without a caption
🫡18🔥6👍2
https://elfarodeceuta.es/detenido-marroqui-intentar-apunalar-soldado-regulares/
🔥17🫡6❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥35🫡14❤7🎉1
𝗖𝗲𝘂𝘁𝗮: 𝗹𝗼 𝗾𝘂𝗲 𝗵𝗮𝘀 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗱𝗶𝗱𝗼 𝘀𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗰𝗹𝗮𝗺𝗮 Vacaciones cortadas el 13 de agosto. Vuelos comprados, hoteles pagados y vuelta por cuenta propia. Jornadas sin cuento. Y todavía sin una orden que diga cómo se compensa. A eso se suma salir a la calle sin brazalete, sin identificación de agente de la autoridad y sin reglas de actuación escritas. Si algo sale mal, el que declara es el militar. Lo hemos preguntado por escrito al…
👍17❤11🔥6
Protege tus derechos y asegura tu carrera en las Fuerzas Armadas. Únete a una asociación profesional que lucha por mejorar tus retribuciones, conciliación y seguridad laboral, siempre con el mejor respaldo jurídico. Da el paso y asóciate hoy: https://www.militaresconfuturo.es/asociate/
👍14🔥9❤3
🛏️ 𝗖𝗘𝗨𝗧𝗔: 𝗙𝗨𝗘𝗥𝗔 𝗗𝗘 𝗟𝗔 𝗖𝗔𝗠𝗔𝗥𝗘𝗧𝗔 𝗘𝗡 𝟮𝟰 𝗛𝗢𝗥𝗔𝗦 Nos escriben de Regulares: se está sacando al personal de sus camaretas para alojar a gente ajena a la unidad. Un día de margen, sin alojamiento asignado y cada uno buscándose la vida. Se ha llegado a plantear hacer volver a quien está de permiso para vaciar habitaciones. 🦠 Y todo esto mientras 𝗻𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗲 𝗵𝗮 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗳𝗶𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗱𝗼 𝗽𝗼𝗿 𝗲𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗼 que el brote de sarna esté cerrado. Redistribui…
🔥22❤8
⏱️ 𝗖𝗘𝗨𝗧𝗔: 𝗟𝗔𝗦 𝗛𝗢𝗥𝗔𝗦 𝗤𝗨𝗘 𝗡𝗔𝗗𝗜𝗘 𝗔𝗣𝗨𝗡𝗧𝗔 Nos siguen escribiendo desde el dispositivo del Ejército de Tierra en Ceuta: jornadas maratonianas, disponibilidad total y horas que no se compensan. ⚖️ No es mala suerte, es el modelo. La 𝗢𝗿𝗱𝗲𝗻 𝗗𝗘𝗙/𝟭𝟯𝟲𝟯/𝟮𝟬𝟭𝟲 no paga horas extraordinarias: las cambia por descanso. Y ese descanso viene con letra pequeña: 🔹 El día de descanso obligatorio solo nace a partir de 𝟮𝟰 𝗵𝗼𝗿𝗮𝘀 ininterrump…
🔥23❤4👍3
🥵 𝟮𝟭 𝗞𝗜𝗟𝗢𝗠𝗘𝗧𝗥𝗢𝗦 𝗘𝗡 𝗦𝗘𝗣𝗧𝗜𝗘𝗠𝗕𝗥𝗘 𝗬 𝗦𝗜𝗡 𝗥𝗢𝗗𝗔𝗝𝗘 Nos escriben del 𝗚𝗔𝗖𝗔 𝗫𝗜 (Base General Menacho, Badajoz): para la semana que viene hay programada una carrera de 𝟮𝟭 kilómetros. El personal acaba de incorporarse de vacaciones, sin rodaje, y con las temperaturas que quedan en Extremadura. Es el tercer aviso que nos llega de esta unidad por lo mismo. ⚠️ El propio Ejército de Tierra difundió este verano por Mensadef que entr…
🔥22🤩3❤2
📄 𝗘𝗡 𝗔𝗟𝗕𝗔𝗖𝗘𝗧𝗘, 𝗣𝗢𝗥 𝗘𝗦𝗖𝗥𝗜𝗧𝗢: 𝗣𝗘𝗥𝗠𝗜𝗦𝗢𝗦 𝗖𝗢𝗡 𝗟𝗘𝗧𝗥𝗔 𝗣𝗘𝗤𝗨𝗘ÑA Después de Tablada nos llega el procedimiento operativo de la 𝗠𝗔𝗘𝗦𝗔𝗟 𝗱𝗲 𝗔𝗹𝗯𝗮𝗰𝗲𝘁𝗲 sobre nombramiento de servicios: 🔹 Un permiso de menos de 𝗰𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗼 días hábiles 𝗻𝘂𝗻𝗰𝗮 te libra del servicio. 🔹 Hay que pedirlo antes de que salga el cuadrante. Si no, queda 𝘀𝗶𝗲𝗺𝗽𝗿𝗲 «sin perjuicio del servicio». 🔹 En Semana Santa y del 22 de diciembre al 7 de enero, 𝘁𝗲 𝗻𝗼𝗺𝗯𝗿𝗮𝗻 𝗶𝗴𝘂𝗮𝗹: c…
🔥16❤7
No quieren firmar por miedo a cometer un delito de prevaricación, porque todo es muy bonito hasta que se van las cámaras. Los militares andan por las calles sin ser agentes de la autoridad y sin cobertura legal alguna, pero no tendrán miedo hasta que les llegue una citación del juzgado. https://www.elmundo.es/espana/2026/08/31/6a95a49be85eced42a8b4599.html
🔥23❤1
🛡️ 𝗖𝗘𝗨𝗧𝗔: 𝗦𝗘 𝗔𝗗𝗜𝗘𝗦𝗧𝗥𝗔 𝗣𝗔𝗥𝗔 𝗔𝗟𝗚𝗢 𝗤𝗨𝗘 𝗟𝗨𝗘𝗚𝗢 𝗡𝗢 𝗦𝗘 𝗔𝗨𝗧𝗢𝗥𝗜𝗭𝗔 Nos escriben desde el 𝗚𝗥𝗘𝗚 𝟱𝟰: la unidad adquirió en 2024 equipos de control de masas y se adiestra periódicamente en su empleo, incluso junto a la policía. No es un secreto: lo publicó el propio Ministerio en su nota de prensa de septiembre de 2024. ❓ La pregunta del personal es sencilla: si se invierte y se adiestra, ¿en qué supuestos está autorizado emplea…
🔥26❤16
🧯 𝗝𝗔𝗧𝗠𝗔𝗗: ¿𝗤𝗨𝗜É𝗡 𝗥𝗘𝗦𝗣𝗢𝗡𝗗𝗘 𝗙𝗨𝗘𝗥𝗔 𝗗𝗘 𝗛𝗢𝗥𝗔𝗦? Nos escriben desde la 𝗝𝗔𝗧𝗠𝗔𝗗, unos 𝟭𝟱𝟬 𝗲𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗼𝘀: se ha suprimido en la práctica la figura del suboficial de guardia, mediante un cambio de jornada comunicado a última hora del día anterior. ❓ La pregunta que trasladan es razonable: fuera del horario ordinario, ¿sobre quién recae ahora la decisión ante una incidencia grave? No es teoría. Ha habido un conato de incendio en u…
🔥22❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 127 posts we hold for @ciudadanosdeuniforme. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ciudadanos de Uniforme” (@ciudadanosdeuniforme), 28,711 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ciudadanosdeuniforme.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.