Channel
@DerechodelaRed
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
15,689subscribers
+24 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001033181128 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DerechodelaRed |
| Created | 25 March 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DerechodelaRed |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 03:57 | 15,689 | -1 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 12:42 | 15,690 | -10 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 23:21 | 15,700 | +1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 02:19 | 15,699 | +5 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 01:58 | 15,694 | +4 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 02:17 | 15,690 | -9 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:12 | 15,699 | +4 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:54 | 15,695 | +1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 07:43 | 15,694 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:46 | 15,695 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 09:58 | 15,694 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 12:37 | 15,696 | +1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:55 | 15,695 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:03 | 15,699 | +5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:39 | 15,694 | +4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 11:12 | 15,690 | +2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 11:15 | 15,688 | +6 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 15,682 | +4 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 07:22 | 15,678 | +3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:03 | 15,675 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
320 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤔 | 68 | 21.3% | |
| ❤ | 57 | 17.8% | |
| 👍 | 50 | 15.6% | |
| 🔥 | 46 | 14.4% | |
| 👏 | 40 | 12.5% | |
| 🤬 | 22 | 6.88% | |
| 🤮 | 21 | 6.56% | |
| 😱 | 10 | 3.13% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 0.938% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 0.625% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.313% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 320 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
▶️ Cientos de conversaciones compartidas de Claude aparecieron indexadas en Google Cómo revisar y revocar tus propios enlaces compartidos. https://derechodelared.com/2026/07/28/conversaciones-compartidas-de-claude-aparecen-indexadas-en-google/
👏9😱7🤮5❤1
📝”Prismas: por qué ya no vivimos el momento, solo lo grabamos” No son las pantallas ni los móviles: son los prismas invisibles a través de los que hemos empezado a interpretar la realidad, en vez de vivirla https://derechodelared.com/2026/07/25/prismas-por-que-ya-no-vivimos-el-momento-solo-lo-grabamos/
❤11👍7🤔4
⚖️ “Bruselas multa a Google con 890 millones por abusar de su posición dominante” La Comisión Europea sanciona a Google con 890 millones de euros por favorecer sus propios servicios en el buscador y por impedir a los desarrolladores de Google Play informar de ofertas más baratas fuera de la tienda. https://derechodelared.com/2026/07/24/bruselas-multa-a-google-con-890-millones-por-abusar-de-su-posicion-dominante/
🤔10❤4🔥3
🤖 “El índice de seguridad de IA de 2026: nadie aprueba con nota, y hay un dato que incomoda” El Índice de Seguridad de IA del Future of Life Institute da un C+ como mejor nota de toda la industria, y no es a Mistral que suspende pese a operar bajo la regulación más estricta del mundo. https://derechodelared.com/2026/07/21/indice-de-seguridad-ia-2026/
❤6🔥1
🔓“Hugging Face hackeada por un agente de IA autónomo.” Y cuando la empresa quiso investigar el ataque, sus propios modelos de IA se negaron a analizarlo https://derechodelared.com/2026/07/20/hugging-face-hackeada-por-un-agente-de-ia-autonomo/
🤔13🤯3🔥2🤩1
⚒️”pentest-ai: la herramienta de código abierto que usa IA para poner a prueba la seguridad de una web” pentest-ai automatiza el pentesting con IA coordinando herramientas ofensivas reales. Con un matiz: solo con un modelo local los datos quedan completamente aislados de terceros https://derechodelared.com/2026/07/19/pentes-ai-herramienta-codigo-abierto-pentest-ia/
👍12❤5
⚖️ ”xAI demanda a un usuario por usar Grok para generar deepfakes sexuales de menores” xAI, la empresa de IA de Elon Musk, demanda a un hombre que usó Grok para crear deepfakes sexuales de menores. https://derechodelared.com/2026/07/17/xai-demanda-a-un-usuario-por-usar-grok-para-generar-deepfakes-sexuales-de-menores/
🤬11👍2
🇪🇺”Bruselas obliga a Google a abrir Android a asistentes de IA rivales de Gemini” La Comisión Europea impone a Google dos medidas de la DMA: abrir funciones clave de Android a asistentes de IA rivales y compartir sus datos de búsqueda con motores de la competencia. https://derechodelared.com/2026/07/16/bruselas-obliga-a-google-a-abrir-android-a-asistentes-de-ia-rivales-de-gemini?-v4
🤮6🔥5🤔2❤1
Comunicado oficial NAVAJA NEGRA Querida comunidad, Con enorme tristeza queremos comunicar que este año no será posible celebrar una nueva edición del Congreso Navaja Negra. Es una decisión extremadamente dolorosa para quienes llevamos años trabajando con la ilusión de volver a reunir a nuestra comunidad año tras año. Durante todo este tiempo hemos dedicado incontables horas de trabajo para sacar adelante el Congre…
🤬11🤔8❤6👍1
👮♂️"La Policía Nacional desmantela una red que blanqueó 140 millones con fraude del CEO" Cuatro detenidos en España, Portugal y Panamá tras una investigación que destapó más de 800 cuentas mula y 94 millones de euros movidos por fraude BEC https://derechodelared.com/2026/07/15/la-policia-nacional-desmantela-una-red-que-blanqueo-140-millones-con-fraude-del-ceo/
👍6👏3
🤖”Cómo borrar tus datos de Claude: guía completa de memoria, historial y privacidad” Aprende a borrar tus datos de Claude: qué guarda la memoria, cómo verla y eliminarla, y cómo evitar que tus chats entrenen los modelos. https://derechodelared.com/2026/07/14/como-borrar-tus-datos-claude/
👍6🔥3❤2
📎 Microsoft adelanta a 2029 su fecha límite para migrar a criptografía poscuántica Microsoft ha acelerado su programa de seguridad cuántica y se marca 2029 como fecha para completar la transición de sus productos y servicios críticos a criptografía poscuántica. Pd: si has entendido la referencia del clip y el nexo Microsoft-clip, revisa el colesterol en la próxima analítica 😂 https://derechodelared.com/2026/07/13/…
🔥7🤔4🤮3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DerechodelaRed. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Derecho de la Red” (@DerechodelaRed), 15,689 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DerechodelaRed.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.