Periodismo a pesar de todo, también en Telegram. Hazte socio, hazte socia https://www.eldiario.es/hazte-socio
🙋🏻♀️🙋🏻♂️ Te escriben desde la redacción Carlota, Diego, Matías, África, Alberto, Toño y Ander
✉️ Puedes contactarnos en [email protected]
Created
25 September 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 41 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @eldiarioes — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
30 measurements spanning 36 days, net -158. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 44,726–45,073 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Sept 2026, 16:37
44,766
-29
7 Sept 2026, 16:40
44,795
-28
4 Sept 2026, 20:41
44,823
-9
3 Sept 2026, 05:52
44,832
-1
2 Sept 2026, 03:24
44,833
-10
1 Sept 2026, 00:17
44,843
-18
30 Aug 2026, 20:58
44,861
-5
29 Aug 2026, 21:37
44,866
-6
28 Aug 2026, 22:14
44,872
-12
26 Aug 2026, 21:28
44,884
-1
26 Aug 2026, 00:38
44,885
-11
25 Aug 2026, 03:23
44,896
-2
23 Aug 2026, 18:45
44,898
-16
22 Aug 2026, 00:17
44,914
-20
20 Aug 2026, 16:05
44,934
-7
19 Aug 2026, 15:11
44,941
-10
18 Aug 2026, 12:18
44,951
-6
17 Aug 2026, 09:35
44,957
-14
15 Aug 2026, 17:46
44,971
-5
14 Aug 2026, 07:15
44,976
first reading
Engagement
388 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 75 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
20.4%
avg views ÷ 44,766 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,150
301 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
301
of 388 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 September 2026
Posts held
388 (4 August 2026 – 11 September 2026)
Views total
2,754,360
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Sept 2026, 00:48 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈12,800
Videos
≈413
Links
≈15,900
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 53s
Average length
57s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
🎉 Llegó el mejor momento de la semana: los planes para el finde. Aquí tienes tres libros y tres películas para saber qué hacer. Como siempre, seleccionado con mucho mimo por nuestro equipo de Cultura. ¡Te toca elegir! 👉 https://en.eldiario.es/dWA8Ow
📺 Si estás más en modo sofá y tele en plena cuesta de septiembre, aquí te dejo las 16 series (que no son pocas) de la semana 👉 https://en.eldiario.es/ghgjCe
🎥 Por últim…
📝 Unos versos que son de Lorca. Un informe pericial acaba de confirmar que los versos inéditos del poeta granadino eran auténticos.
Los encontró el artista Miguel Poveda y aunque algunos expertos habían cuestionado si eran originales, los peritos ha dado el visto bueno: "Fueron escritos por don Federico García Lorca".
Puedes leer la noticia al completo aquí 👉🏻https://en.eldiario.es/yL84FM
‼️ "Vas a pagar por lo de Ceuta y Melilla". Con esa premisa es con la que agredieron a Hamza El Guenyari. Pasó este jueves en la localidad murciana de Mula. Le atacó al grito de "moro de mierda".
Su agresor le partió una botella en la cabeza. Tal y como cuenta, lleva "llorando desde ayer". Con cuatro grapas en la cabeza y una profunda tristeza de quien no entiende qué ha ocurrido, nos cuenta lo que pasó 👉 https://en…
⛪ De 'Cónclave' a Torreciudad. La película de ficción protagonizada Ralph Fiennes se queda corta con lo que está pasando en el municipio oscense. Este sábado, acogerá su tradicional Jornada Mariana de la Familia en un momento bastante tenso.
👀 Pero es que Torreciudad ha pasado de las “intrigas mafiosas” del Opus Dei denunciadas por Francisco a “una situación diabólica” para León XIV.
Todo tiene su origen en el año …
🤖 Usar una IA de EEUU para vigilar a EEUU. Ayer me despedía contándote que Anthropic había frenado varios intentos de crear armas biológicas con su IA, Claude. Pues hoy nos levantamos con una diferente.
📍 Un nuevo informe de la compañía estadounidense ha confirmado que Irán usó su IA para localizar barcos de EEUU en Oriente Medio. Y lo más llamativo es que no es el único uso regular.
Aquí te contamos todos ellos 👉🏻…
🟣 Podemos da el pistoletazo de salida a la candidatura de Irene Montero a las generales. El partido oficializará este sábado a la exministra de Igualdad como su apuesta electoral y defenderá una candidatura "que aspira a ser lo más amplia posible". Con ello, no se cierra la puerta a su aproximación a los partidos de Sumar. El objetivo, dicen desde el partido, es encabezar "una candidatura nítidamente de izquierdas".
…
🏡 Ayuso, forzada a hablar del piso de lujo: "Señor Sánchez, es un mentiroso, ese aticazo no era para mí". La presidenta madrileña ha tenido que escuchar a la oposición durante el debate del estado de la región criticar la famosa operación inmobiliaria que deja más preguntas que certezas y un coste de más de 6 millones a la Comunidad. Su partido ha tratado de despejar balones fuera: "No hay piso que tape la traición d…
‼️ Huelga indefinida de médicos desde el 28 de octubre. Los sindicatos médicos han anunciado la convocatoria de un paro indefinid como protesta por el Estatuto Marco que han aprobado el Ministerio de Sanidad con las organizaciones sindicales presentes en la negociación (CCOO, UGT, Csif y Satse). Es un paso más en la estrategia de paros parciales que se vienen realizando desde principios de año.
Te lo contamos aquí h…
‼️ Primera dimisión tras la crisis de Ceuta: el jefe de gabinete del delegado del Gobierno. Gonzalo Sanz fue quien recibió el Whatsapp de los servicios secretos un día antes de la entrada masiva en el que advertían de grupos en redes sociales alentando el colapso de la frontera. https://en.eldiario.es/ClB7o0
🗣 El PP ha insistido hoy en que Marruecos es "responsable por acción u omisión" de la crisis en la ciudad. Re…
👋🏻 ¡Buenos días! El supuesto riesgo para el sistema electoral que ve el Supremo en la ley de nietos se aplicó sin polémica en 2008. Ya la primera ley de Memoria Histórica tenía una orden similar y la de la actual ya se aplicó en las pasadas elecciones. Sin embargo, el tribunal ha decidido seguir las tesis de la minoría de la Junta Electoral, de Vox y de Iustitia Europa. https://en.eldiario.es/IqfqPF
🗣 Hemos hablado …
☣️ Usar la IA para crear armas biológicas. Hace una hora te hablaba de lo que opinan los expertos de los riesgos de estos modelos. Ahora, tocaría hablar de otro tema, pero es que la que se está montando con la IA es tremenda.
📱 Y no hablo de la moda de compartir una foto con un amigo o familiar en la que ChatGPT transforma una foto tuya como si fuera de los años 80. Eso está gracioso. Que una empresa como Anthropic …
🤖 "Es potencialmente mortal". Con estas palabras, el investigador Jacob Coxon ha hablado de los riesgos de la inteligencia artificial. Sí, va mucho más allá que mandar vídeos de perros y gatos hechos con IA generativa.
El aviso que ha lanzado, y que no es poca cosa, llega un día después de que ingeniero de Anthropic dimitiera alertando de los peligros reales de un sistema en manos de empresas.
Te lo contamos aquí 👉…
Showing the 12 most recent of 388 posts we hold for @eldiarioes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@eldiarioes edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
25 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@eldiarioes named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@nosoloviernes named in 2 posts, 31 August 2026 – 1 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Spanish Revolution @SpanishRevolution · 31,438 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
Xataka @xataka · 49,354 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 August 2026
Estrenos de cine 📽️🍿 Peliculas Gratis Series gratis @estrenosdecinee · 56,860 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 22 here — alongside 21 others — read 8 September 2026
ViajerosPiratas - Viajes y Vuelos baratos @Viajerospiratas · 67,047 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 29 August 2026
Forocoches @forocoches_oficial · 41,892 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 29 August 2026
gencat @gencat · 36,073 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 2 September 2026
Guía Low Cost @guialowcost · 38,789 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 31 August 2026
F1 Stream 🏁 @Formula1es · 59,659 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 8 September 2026
BcnLgnds @leyendasbcn · 52,895 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 24 August 2026
Noticias de Telegram @TelegramES · 147,767 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
Andro4all @andro4all · 37,138 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 1 September 2026
TN Todo Noticias @todonoticias · 37,562 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 1 September 2026
🔒Seguridad Informática @seguridadinformatic4 · 29,186 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 8 September 2026
Proton @proton_privacy · 37,476 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 31 August 2026
Òmnium @omnium · 31,001 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 6 September 2026
The New York Times @nytimes · 181,631 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026
The Guardian @guardian · 41,226 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 29 August 2026
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“eldiario.es” (@eldiarioes), 44,766 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eldiarioes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.