National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
55 measurements spanning 89 days, net -71. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,833–17,974 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 55
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
3 Nov 2026, 01:39
17,887
+4
2 Nov 2026, 04:08
17,883
-2
1 Nov 2026, 04:09
17,885
+4
31 Oct 2026, 05:39
17,881
+1
30 Oct 2026, 02:20
17,880
+4
29 Oct 2026, 00:09
17,876
+15
27 Oct 2026, 22:36
17,861
+1
27 Oct 2026, 00:25
17,860
+1
25 Oct 2026, 22:30
17,859
+1
24 Oct 2026, 21:35
17,858
-7
23 Oct 2026, 18:08
17,865
+2
22 Oct 2026, 15:39
17,863
+5
21 Oct 2026, 08:56
17,858
-4
20 Oct 2026, 05:05
17,862
+6
19 Oct 2026, 07:29
17,856
+3
18 Oct 2026, 10:31
17,853
-2
17 Oct 2026, 13:05
17,855
-6
14 Oct 2026, 11:41
17,861
-3
12 Oct 2026, 22:08
17,864
+13
8 Oct 2026, 11:59
17,851
first reading
Engagement
128 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.5%
avg views ÷ 17,887 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,770
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.213%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 128 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026
Posts held
128 (30 July 2026 – 2 November 2026)
Views total
55,343
Reactions total
118
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Nov 2026, 03:20 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,400
Videos
≈972
Links
≈9,710
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
634 reactions across 115 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
203
32.0%
👍
104
16.4%
🤬
100
15.8%
👎
98
15.5%
😢
60
9.46%
😁
31
4.89%
👏
24
3.79%
🤔
7
1.10%
🤯
7
1.10%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 124 of the 128 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 659 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 128 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌗Para leer antes de dormir 🌓
Belén Albertos, bióloga: “Los musgos nos enseñan que la sencillez no es sinónimo de inferioridad”
La presidenta de la Sociedad Española de Briología descubre el fascinante universo de los briófitos, “plantas superiores” capaces de vivir en la Antártida o en el desierto de Mojave, embellecer jardines y brillar en la oscuridad
https://social.elpais.com/rrswf
☕Para comentar en la pausa del café ☕
Mary Austin, la exprometida de Freddie Mercury que lleva años guardando su legado: “Nuestro amor era mucho más poderoso de lo que llegué a imaginar”
La heredera principal del ícono del rock lanza en España su libro ‘Una vida en verso, Freddie Mercury’, con manuscritos de las letras y fotos personales del cantante de Queen.
https://social.elpais.com/0pngu
⏱️EL PAÍS Exprés | ¿Tienes seis minutos? Los siete temas del día: del accidente de Urda al voto de los latinos en las ‘midterms’ de EE UU y libros para leer en noviembre ⚡👉🏽 Léelos aquí
http://social.elpais.com/g4wzb1
El maquinista de Angrois al operador de Atocha: “Que se aísle de la tele y la prensa: le pueden hacer mucho daño”
El maquinista de Angrois dice que lleva su día a día como puede. “Soy una persona normal que lleva una desgracia a sus espaldas”. ¿Qué le diría al operador de Atocha? “Que procure aislarse de la tele y la prensa, ya que eso le va a hacer mucho daño. Y que al final tiene que salir la verdad. Que se rodee …
¿Qué causó el accidente? La secuencia paso a paso de una cadena de fallos que el sistema no detuvo
Reconstruimos la secuencia minuto a minuto usando datos de posición de Renfe, documentos oficiales, los tres audios del centro de control de Atocha que han trascendido, las explicaciones del ministro de Transportes, conversaciones con maquinistas, información publicada y la primera nota de los investigadores de la AITA…
⏱️EL PAÍS Exprés | ¿Tienes siete minutos? Los 8 temas del día: del accidente de Urda a la oleada de protestas juveniles que vive Europa y la conflictiva historia de Mägo de Oz⚡👉🏽 Léelos aquí
https://social.elpais.com/sielscsd
⏱️EL PAÍS Exprés | ¿Tienes seis minutos? Los siete temas del día: del gesto inédito del Papa en las ‘midterms’ al choque de trenes y las series que llegan en noviembre ⚡👉🏽 Léelos aquí
https://social.elpais.com/sielscsd
Cómo ayudar a las víctimas tras una catástrofe como el accidente de tren de Urda: “El psicólogo debe estar desde el minuto uno, como un bombero”
Se apuntan al menos tres problemas encadenados. Repasamos lo que sabemos del accidente y las principales incógnitas
https://social.elpais.com/rue_f
¿Por qué chocaron los trenes? Tres fallos catastróficos que han costado 69 vidas
Se apuntan al menos tres problemas encadenados. Repasamos lo que sabemos del accidente y las principales incógnitas
https://social.elpais.com/ob7a9
⏱️EL PAÍS Exprés | ¿Tienes siete minutos? Los ocho temas del día: de la semejanza entre PP y Vox a Bolsonario e Israel ⚡👉🏽 Léelos aquí
https://social.elpais.com/sielscrv
🌗Para leer antes de dormir 🌓
La nueva edad dorada del cocido madrileño: el plato tradicional convive con versiones cada vez más sofisticadas
Aunque pensemos en el cocido como una receta inamovible, son muchos los restaurantes que apuestan por la innovación, mientras otros se centran en refinar la tradición
https://social.elpais.com/msskr
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 128 posts we hold for @elpais. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
eldiario.es @eldiarioes · 44,719 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 August 2026
Público @publico_es · 20,968 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 September 2026
Ministerio de Sanidad @sanidadgob · 136,436 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 16 September 2026
Xataka @xataka · 48,885 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 August 2026
Trabajar por el Mundo @trabajarporelmundo · 28,003 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 9 September 2026
Salut @salutcat · 24,272 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 16 September 2026
TN Todo Noticias @todonoticias · 36,875 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 1 September 2026
The New York Times @nytimes · 188,518 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026
Policía Nacional @policianacional · 19,327 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 2 October 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ELPAÍS” (@elpais), 17,887 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/elpais.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.