Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Público

Channel

Público

@publico_es

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

20,930subscribers

-35 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001064300124
TypeChannel
Username@publico_es
Created28 July 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/publico_es

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

20,93020,98020,9555 August 2026 — 20,965 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,965 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,963 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,957 subscribers8 August 2026 — 20,955 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,958 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20,959 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,972 subscribers13 August 2026 — 20,974 subscribers14 August 2026 — 20,972 subscribers16 August 2026 — 20,978 subscribers17 August 2026 — 20,980 subscribers18 August 2026 — 20,978 subscribers19 August 2026 — 20,980 subscribers20 August 2026 — 20,974 subscribers21 August 2026 — 20,970 subscribers22 August 2026 — 20,963 subscribers24 August 2026 — 20,967 subscribers25 August 2026 — 20,966 subscribers26 August 2026 — 20,958 subscribers27 August 2026 — 20,955 subscribers28 August 2026 — 20,944 subscribers29 August 2026 — 20,942 subscribers30 August 2026 — 20,940 subscribers31 August 2026 — 20,941 subscribers1 September 2026 — 20,950 subscribers3 September 2026 — 20,955 subscribers4 September 2026 — 20,951 subscribers7 September 2026 — 20,949 subscribers10 September 2026 — 20,945 subscribers12 September 2026 — 20,944 subscribers14 September 2026 — 20,942 subscribers15 September 2026 — 20,939 subscribers18 September 2026 — 20,930 subscribers5 August 202618 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -35. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,923–20,988 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 00:3720,930-9
15 Sept 2026, 22:1720,939-3
14 Sept 2026, 09:1920,942-2
12 Sept 2026, 19:0020,944-1
10 Sept 2026, 18:5920,945-4
7 Sept 2026, 14:5520,949-2
4 Sept 2026, 18:0020,951-4
3 Sept 2026, 00:5920,955+5
1 Sept 2026, 21:2520,950+9
31 Aug 2026, 18:3420,941+1
30 Aug 2026, 18:2420,940-2
29 Aug 2026, 15:5420,942-2
28 Aug 2026, 14:4420,944-11
27 Aug 2026, 11:3320,955-3
26 Aug 2026, 12:2820,958-8
25 Aug 2026, 15:2320,966-1
24 Aug 2026, 13:3320,967+4
22 Aug 2026, 17:5620,963-7
21 Aug 2026, 05:4320,970-4
20 Aug 2026, 08:0420,974first reading

Engagement

165 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.2%
avg views ÷ 20,930 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,030
68 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
68
of 165 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held165 (1 August 20263 September 2026)
Views total273,950
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 17:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 15:09 UTC≈1,840 viewsread 3 September 2026

🔴 ÚLTIMA HORA I Marlaska se queja al CGPJ de que la jueza prohibiera a la Policía informar a sus mandos https://diario.publico.es/1ljbk4

3 Sept 2026, 12:11 UTC≈2,920 viewsread 3 September 2026

🔴 ÚLTIMA HORA I La Justicia absuelve al futbolista del Real Madrid Raúl Asencio acusado de difundir un vídeo sexual tras recibir el perdón de las víctimas https://diario.publico.es/5dgdv4

3 Sept 2026, 08:50 UTC≈3,320 viewsread 3 September 2026

🔴 ÚLTIMA HORA | 'La bola negra', 'Los domingos' y 'El ser querido', las películas españolas preseleccionadas para los Óscar https://diario.publico.es/s6hgo3

3 Sept 2026, 08:17 UTC≈3,290 viewsread 3 September 2026

❗Pedro Sánchez desvela que convocó a la embajadora marroquí el 21 de agosto https://diario.publico.es/qhhc72

3 Sept 2026, 07:00 UTC≈3,170 viewsread 3 September 2026

🔴 DIRECTO | Sigue la comparecencia de Pedro Sánchez en el Congreso por la crisis de Ceuta https://diario.publico.es/lt2zi4

3 Sept 2026, 06:23 UTC≈3,040 viewsread 3 September 2026

¡Buenos días! ☀️ Seguimos con nuestra mirada puesta en Ceuta. Antes de la comparecencia del presidente del Gobierno, en ‘Público’ te traemos los principales temas de nuestra portada de este jueves: 📃 Muchos indicios, ninguna prueba directa: el informe que apunta a Marruecos en la entrada masiva en Ceuta La Policía constata en su polémico informe la imposibilidad de determinar la autoría, pero apunta a una serie de

2 Sept 2026, 20:10 UTC≈3,230 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

📰 La Portada de Público ya está disponible para las y los suscriptores: 👉 Muchos indicios, ninguna prueba directa: el informe que apunta a Marruecos en la entrada masiva en Ceuta 📲 https://diario.publico.es/2pwfbme

2 Sept 2026, 18:02 UTC≈3,470 viewsread 3 September 2026

🗞️ Lo que sabemos del informe sobre el papel de Marruecos en Ceuta y otras cuatro noticias de hoy 🔎 Agentes marroquíes "guiaron" la entrada de migrantes 🗣️ Una jueza pide la macrocausa para el 'caso residencias' 🇪🇺 Kallas ve "terrorismo de Estado" en el ataque a Leipzig https://diario.publico.es/6uhsi4

2 Sept 2026, 16:49 UTC≈3,550 viewsread 3 September 2026

🔴 ÚLTIMA HORA I El informe de la Policía señala que agentes marroquíes "guiaron" la entrada de migrantes a Ceuta https://diario.publico.es/l5vcs4

2 Sept 2026, 14:20 UTC≈3,720 viewsread 3 September 2026

👉 Marlaska asegura que el informe que atribuye a Marruecos la entrada masiva de migrantes en Ceuta debió ponerse "inmediatamente" a disposición del Gobierno, pero ¿tiene razón? https://diario.publico.es/ow4gj3

2 Sept 2026, 13:41 UTC≈3,700 viewsread 3 September 2026

❗Un juez cita a Begoña Gómez tras una querella en su contra de Vito Quiles https://diario.publico.es/qkqjl3

2 Sept 2026, 13:21 UTC≈3,700 viewsread 3 September 2026

🔴 ÚLTIMA HORA | El director de la Policía desmiente ante Marlaska que exista un informe sobre la implicación de Marruecos en la crisis de Ceuta https://diario.publico.es/cue483

Showing the 12 most recent of 165 posts we hold for @publico_es. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@publico_es edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
11 August 2026
Most recent edit
11 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

eldiario.es
@eldiarioes · 44,692
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 August 2026
Spanish Revolution
@SpanishRevolution · 31,422
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
Xataka
@xataka · 49,293
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 August 2026
Inna Afinogenova
@inafinogenova · 75,374
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
gencat
@gencat · 36,067
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 2 September 2026
The Guardian
@guardian · 41,309
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q1835391 on Wikidata, read 13 September 2026
LabelPúblico
DescriptionSpanish online newspaper
X / Twitter@publico_es
Official sitehttp://www.publico.es

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Público” (@publico_es), 20,930 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/publico_es.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.