Channel
@newtral_telegram
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,947subscribers
-24 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001350495695 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @newtral_telegram |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/newtral_telegram |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 19:41 | 7,947 | -3 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 06:46 | 7,950 | -9 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:03 | 7,959 | +2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:55 | 7,957 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 06:05 | 7,958 | -5 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 04:57 | 7,963 | -5 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:16 | 7,968 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:16 | 7,969 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 7,972 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:47 | 7,970 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:04 | 7,971 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:36 | 7,971 | first reading |
69 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 69 (29 July 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 45,803 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 19:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Circula en redes sociales una publicación que relaciona uno de los nombres que aparecen en la filtración del grupo de hackers Jabaroot, que contiene datos de alrededor de 70.000 personas supuestamente vinculadas a los servicios de inteligencia de Marruecos, con uno de los terroristas condenados por el 11-M. 🤔 ¿Qué sabemos de esto?
📲 Circula en redes sociales un vídeo en el que aparecen varias casas en un valle arrasadas por un alud y, según los mensajes que lo comparten, se trataría de una escena de las inundaciones que han asolado Nepal en agosto de 2026. ❌ Sin embargo, es un bulo: son imágenes antiguas de la India. Newtral forma parte de Ibercheck, una alianza de medios de comunicación y verificadores de España y Portugal para luchar contr…
El Consejo de Ministros ha aprobado este martes la constitución de un mando único para gestionar la crisis en Ceuta casi un mes después de la entrada masiva de migrantes que tuvo lugar el 30 de julio. 👉 Para ello, se declara la situación de interés para la Seguridad Nacional. 🤔 ¿Qué significa crear un mando único ante una crisis?
📲 Medios de comunicación nacionales e internacionales, usuarios de redes sociales de numerosos rincones del mundo y cuentas especializadas en deportes con millones de seguidores se han hecho eco en los últimos días de un artículo que asegura que el futbolista blaugrana Pablo Páez Gavira, más conocido como Gavi, habría invertido 1,3 millones de euros para crear 150 apartamentos para personas vulnerables en su municipi…
¿Cómo se organizan 70.000 personas para cruzar la frontera en cuestión de horas? 🗣️ Hablamos con Guillermo Infantes sobre los distintos informes e investigaciones que tratan de explicar la coordinación en redes sociales de la entrada masiva de migrantes del pasado 31 de julio. 🔗 Disponible en nuestro canal de YouTube
🗣️ Margarita Robles abre el calendario de comparecencias sobre la gestión de la crisis migratoria en Ceuta. Después de ella, acudirán seis miembros más del Gobierno para rendir cuentas sobre el mismo asunto: Félix Bolaños, Mónica García, José Manuel Albares, Fernando Grande-Marlaska, Elma Saiz y Sira Rego. 🔗 Consulta las fechas de sus comparecencias:
¿Has visto esta foto viral? Los que la comparten aseguran que se trata de un migrante de Ceuta sujetando el cadáver de un gato que se va a comer. ❌ Pero es un bulo. La imagen está creada con IA a partir de un vídeo de la agencia EFE. ¿Quieres saber como lo hemos verificado? 🔗 Sigue leyendo aquí Newtral forma parte de Ibercheck, una alianza de medios de comunicación y verificadores de España y Portugal para luch…
¿Pagar para ir a la playa en Almería? No caigas en este bulo. 💸 En redes sociales se está difundiendo este vídeo que afirma que se está empezando a cobrar por acceder a las playas y menciona en concreto las del Parque Natural de Cabo de Gata-Níjar, en Almería. ❌ Pero es falso. El cobro corresponde al uso de los aparcamientos del parque, no al acceso a las playas. 🔗 Sigue leyendo aquí. Newtral forma parte de Iber…
📲 En redes sociales se ha viralizado un vídeo de una construcción en llamas. Algunos usuarios relacionan el suceso con la supuesta expulsión de un grupo de israelíes, vinculado a las Fuerzas de Defensa de Israel, de un alojamiento de Airbnb. ❌ Pero es un bulo. 👉 Lo que arde es una instalación de suministro de agua en la localidad albanesa de Vlorë. 🔗 Sigue leyendo... Newtral forma parte de Ibercheck, una alianza …
🎥 Hoy es domingo de Fact-Fiction, la sección en la que contrastamos películas o series basadas en hechos reales para saber qué aspectos se han ficcionado y cuáles se han mantenido fieles a la realidad. 🌊 Analizamos la película de Netflix '23.000 vidas', que cuenta la historia de Jugend Rettet, una ONG alemana creada por un grupo de jóvenes sin experiencia en rescate marítimo que, entre 2016 y 2017, llegó a salvar a …
Buenos días. ¿Has escuchado que los migrantes que se encuentran en Ceuta están “comiéndose” gatos, gaviotas y otros animales? 🔎 Explicamos qué sabemos al respecto y de dónde proceden estas afirmaciones. Link
🤔🔥 ¿Está habiendo más incendios forestales que antes? ¿Por qué algunos son cada vez más difíciles de controlar? ¿Qué significa que un incendio sea de cuarta o quinta generación? Mario Viciosa responde a todas estás preguntas y más en un nuevo vídeo en nuestro canal….
Showing the 12 most recent of 69 posts we hold for @newtral_telegram. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Newtral.es” (@newtral_telegram), 7,947 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/newtral_telegram.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.