Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Canal Red

Channel

Canal Red

@CanalRed_TV

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

16,351subscribers

+46 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001793292435
TypeChannel
Username@CanalRed_TV
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live21 October 2026
Measurements held40
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 21 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/CanalRed_TV

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

16,28116,36616,323.56 August 2026 — 16,305 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,305 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,309 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,305 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,304 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,305 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,312 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,310 subscribers13 August 2026 — 16,309 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,312 subscribers16 August 2026 — 16,311 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,310 subscribers18 August 2026 — 16,312 subscribers19 August 2026 — 16,304 subscribers20 August 2026 — 16,302 subscribers21 August 2026 — 16,294 subscribers27 August 2026 — 16,296 subscribers28 August 2026 — 16,291 subscribers30 August 2026 — 16,287 subscribers31 August 2026 — 16,290 subscribers1 September 2026 — 16,295 subscribers2 September 2026 — 16,296 subscribers5 September 2026 — 16,303 subscribers8 September 2026 — 16,306 subscribers11 September 2026 — 16,312 subscribers13 September 2026 — 16,303 subscribers14 September 2026 — 16,296 subscribers16 September 2026 — 16,288 subscribers18 September 2026 — 16,281 subscribers25 September 2026 — 16,288 subscribers7 October 2026 — 16,358 subscribers12 October 2026 — 16,365 subscribers14 October 2026 — 16,366 subscribers15 October 2026 — 16,363 subscribers16 October 2026 — 16,362 subscribers17 October 2026 — 16,363 subscribers18 October 2026 — 16,354 subscribers19 October 2026 — 16,355 subscribers20 October 2026 — 16,357 subscribers21 October 2026 — 16,351 subscribers16,3516 August 202621 October 2026
40 measurements spanning 76 days, net +46. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,268–16,379 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 40
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Oct 2026, 09:4716,351-6
20 Oct 2026, 07:2616,357+2
19 Oct 2026, 05:5616,355+1
18 Oct 2026, 08:4916,354-9
17 Oct 2026, 05:3016,363+1
16 Oct 2026, 07:3716,362-1
15 Oct 2026, 07:0416,363-3
14 Oct 2026, 06:1716,366+1
12 Oct 2026, 10:5916,365+7
7 Oct 2026, 17:4016,358+70
25 Sept 2026, 08:1816,288+7
18 Sept 2026, 20:5516,281-7
16 Sept 2026, 11:5616,288-8
14 Sept 2026, 17:5916,296-7
13 Sept 2026, 05:1616,303-9
11 Sept 2026, 05:4116,312+6
8 Sept 2026, 08:3616,306+3
5 Sept 2026, 05:5816,303+7
2 Sept 2026, 07:0316,296+1
1 Sept 2026, 04:3716,295first reading

Engagement

33 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 33 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
12m 52s
Average length
2m 34s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

4,460 reactions across 32 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2,23650.1%
❤1,13125.4%
👏63814.3%
🤬1523.41%
🥰1172.62%
🔥531.19%
💯300.673%
😢230.516%
👌150.336%
💩100.224%
🤮100.224%
🌚90.202%
😡80.179%
🙏80.179%
🎉50.112%
🤡40.09%
✍30.067%
🤨30.067%
🎃10.022%
👎10.022%
3 further kinds30.067%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,582 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 19:51 UTC≈1,370 views97 reactionsread 3 September 2026

https://x.com/CanalRed_TV/status/2095237741709504977

👏63❤21👍11🔥2

2 Sept 2026, 16:09 UTC≈2,030 views105 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

La Base 7x1 | La crisis de Ceuta más allá de la propaganda En el programa de hoy 02/09/2026 Pablo Iglesias, Irene Zugasti, Eduardo García y Pablo Hurtado analizan la situación en Ceuta. ¿Qué análisis geopolítico corresponde? ¿Cómo informaron los medios? Todo esto y más en este estreno de una nueva temporada de La Base. 📺 https://youtu.be/4IYlh_gCgcs 🎙 https://go.ivoox.com/rf/179934269

👍85❤11🥰5👏4

2 Sept 2026, 06:56 UTC≈2,060 views129 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

♟ ¡Arranca El Tablero! Hoy hablamos de la situación en Ceuta, del acuerdo petrolero entre Venezuela y EEUU, de los ataques de Israel contra la población de Gaza y más. 📺 https://youtube.com/live/SyngfcbtLTo

❤81👍38👏6🥰4

31 Aug 2026, 06:39 UTC≈2,800 views136 reactionsread 3 September 2026

https://x.com/diario_red_/status/2094313942805860754?s=20

👏91👍27❤10👌8

24 Aug 2026, 11:59 UTC≈5,760 views184 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

🚨Ojo que se viene… https://x.com/eltablero_tv/status/2091824838428004516?s=46

❤120👍48👏7🙏5🥰4

24 Aug 2026, 06:41 UTC≈5,180 views137 reactionsread 3 September 2026

https://x.com/diario_red_/status/2091777731402842130?s=20

❤79👍38🔥18👏2

20 Aug 2026, 09:04 UTC≈6,230 views162 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @canalpabloiglesias

‼️Sicarios de la ultrataderecha: El socio de Negre encarcelado por ordenar un asesinato ➡️ Análisis en La Base América Latina sobre el caso 👇 https://youtu.be/i-cEuEe-8-c?si=EYSQnT_0i78JZizg ➡️ ¿Quién es Cerimedo? Por Estefanía Veloz 👇 https://www.instagram.com/reel/DcNOgqnPl60/?igsh=MTRzeHlzbW1wOGlibQ== ➡️ El análisis de Daniela Pastrana 👇 https://www.instagram.com/reel/DcMt6hZjKpz/?igsh=eHQzcmVndzJxdTAx ➡️ …

👍124❤20👏13✍3🥰2

19 Aug 2026, 10:30 UTC≈4,920 views135 reactionsread 3 September 2026

https://x.com/diario_red_/status/2090022874811601394

🤬94👍23💩10❤3🔥3👎1👏1

19 Aug 2026, 06:50 UTC≈5,160 views95 reactionsread 3 September 2026

https://x.com/i/status/2089967710440448404

❤61👍29👏5

18 Aug 2026, 20:16 UTC≈5,400 views172 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Hoy se cumplen 90 años del asesinato de Federico García Lorca. Los documentos de su muerte siguen secuestrados por la Ley de Secretos Oficiales. Pero sabemos que Federico fue asesinado por los fascistas, por rojo y maricón. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DcMchHZRBZn/?igsi=ajV4OHIwM2k1dWl0

👍102❤48😢13👏4🤬4🤡1

11 Aug 2026, 07:13 UTC≈7,340 views130 reactionsread 3 September 2026

https://x.com/diario_red_/status/2087074690904834229?s=20

👍100❤20👏10

8 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTC≈11,900 views174 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Atención amigas ‼️¿Pasarías el test de decencia española? 🇪🇸 Nuestro pequeño homenaje a las víctimas y supervivientes del #Patronato En colaboración con @50enlibertad https://www.instagram.com/reel/Dbxpc-II7PQ/?igsh=Z3psejNzMGxmMG1i

👍127❤36🔥7👏4

Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @CanalRed_TV. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Público
@publico_es · 20,970
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 September 2026
Spanish Revolution
@SpanishRevolution · 31,553
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
eldiario.es
@eldiarioes · 44,700
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 August 2026
Inna Afinogenova
@inafinogenova · 74,618
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
Descifrando la Guerra
@descifrandolaguerra · 20,747
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 September 2026
Los Periodistas
@AlvaroyAlejandro · 21,598
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 September 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

2 Wikidata items name this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q119628658 on Wikidata, read 18 October 2026
LabelCanal Red
Descriptiontelevision channel
X / Twitter@CanalRed_TV
YouTubeUC3PhLH0Rj2e_-0hNvwTLxGA
Official sitehttps://canalred.tv/
Q122678602 on Wikidata, read 18 October 2026
LabelDiario.RED
DescriptionSpanish online newspaper
X / Twitter@diario_red_
Official sitehttps://diariored.canalred.tv

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Canal Red” (@CanalRed_TV), 16,351 subscribers as measured 21 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CanalRed_TV.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.