3293. "Handedness"

Channel
xkcd
@xkcdchannel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
17,439subscribers
+16 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001008241581 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xkcdchannel |
| Created | 22 September 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 5 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xkcdchannel |
Topic
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 18:17 | 17,439 | -5 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 10:17 | 17,444 | -5 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 04:19 | 17,449 | -4 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 18:57 | 17,453 | +6 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 20:03 | 17,447 | +8 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 17:53 | 17,439 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:44 | 17,443 | -3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:27 | 17,446 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:24 | 17,449 | +3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 13:42 | 17,446 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 11:58 | 17,447 | -6 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:33 | 17,453 | +2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:32 | 17,451 | -3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 03:32 | 17,454 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 00:08 | 17,455 | -4 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 17,459 | +2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 22:27 | 17,457 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:14 | 17,459 | +4 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 17,455 | +8 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:48 | 17,447 | first reading |
Engagement
56 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 36.0%
- avg views ÷ 17,439 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 6,270
- 15 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 15
- of 56 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 56 (22 July 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 94,120 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 09:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
'A 'left-handed specialist' is a physicist who studies the weak interaction.'
Photo, posted without a caption
3292. "Geology Class"
'The rise of AI review bombing tools threatens to take away a crucial source of experience for geology undergraduates.'
Photo, posted without a caption
'It does come at the cost of some launchpad expansions and increased fuel requirements, but that all comes out of the facility's budget.'
3291. "Launchpad"
3290. "Trade"
Photo, posted without a caption
'"You legs may have a comparative advantage at running, but we arms have a competitive advantage at swinging hammers, so unless you accept that we're the dominant limbs and stop hogging the oxygen, that running advantage won't be around for long."'
Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @xkcdchannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@madan_science · 3615 postsPortão Shaolin
@gatesofshaolin · 1303 postsDeputy Sheriff The Viking Programmer
@thevikingprogrammer · 2423 postsMathematics Channel
@mathschan · 4,5072 postsKandi
@Digestivity · 111 postTommy's stolen media
@TomOfMemes · 1401 postЧайник из Юты
@irrationalthings · 1211 postLa Ville Nouvelle
@lavillenouvelle · 291 postMusical memes
@musicalmemes · 1,0201 postUkrainian Shitpost for English Bunsies
@ukr5eng · 1231 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@nexus_search · 66,521
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 22 August 2026
@showerthoughts · 36,163
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 1 September 2026
@programmerjokes · 107,064
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
@hackernewslive · 28,227
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 10 September 2026
@hacker_news_feed · 29,682
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 8 September 2026
@science · 120,288
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
@ilpost_official · 47,428
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 26 August 2026
@sanidadgob · 137,928
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 16 September 2026
@proton_privacy · 36,183
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 31 August 2026
@thedevs · 32,129
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 5 September 2026
@linuxgram · 72,741
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 19 August 2026
@gencat · 36,067
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 2 September 2026
@eldiarioes · 44,692
Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Hacker News
This handle was named once in a Hacker News comment or story, via the public Algolia search API. HN comment and story text has no confirmed reuse licence, so nothing quoted from either is reproduced here — only that a mention exists, when, and by whom, with a link to read it at the source.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“xkcd” (@xkcdchannel), 17,439 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xkcdchannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.