Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for xkcd

Channel

xkcd

@xkcdchannel

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

17,470subscribers

+47 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001008241581
TypeChannel
Username@xkcdchannel
DescriptionThe latest xkcd comics. (xkcd.com) Unofficial channel. Comics are automatically posted within a few minutes after publication.
Created22 September 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded5 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held50
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/xkcdchannel

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

17,42317,47917,4515 August 2026 — 17,423 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,426 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,424 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,427 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,429 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,434 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,438 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,444 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,447 subscribers15 August 2026 — 17,455 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,459 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,457 subscribers19 August 2026 — 17,459 subscribers20 August 2026 — 17,455 subscribers21 August 2026 — 17,454 subscribers22 August 2026 — 17,451 subscribers24 August 2026 — 17,453 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,447 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,446 subscribers27 August 2026 — 17,449 subscribers29 August 2026 — 17,446 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,443 subscribers1 September 2026 — 17,439 subscribers2 September 2026 — 17,447 subscribers6 September 2026 — 17,453 subscribers10 September 2026 — 17,449 subscribers12 September 2026 — 17,444 subscribers17 September 2026 — 17,439 subscribers27 September 2026 — 17,438 subscribers5 October 2026 — 17,442 subscribers13 October 2026 — 17,451 subscribers14 October 2026 — 17,448 subscribers16 October 2026 — 17,441 subscribers17 October 2026 — 17,438 subscribers18 October 2026 — 17,437 subscribers19 October 2026 — 17,440 subscribers20 October 2026 — 17,441 subscribers21 October 2026 — 17,436 subscribers22 October 2026 — 17,472 subscribers23 October 2026 — 17,470 subscribers24 October 2026 — 17,469 subscribers27 October 2026 — 17,470 subscribers29 October 2026 — 17,471 subscribers30 October 2026 — 17,474 subscribers31 October 2026 — 17,477 subscribers1 November 2026 — 17,479 subscribers2 November 2026 — 17,478 subscribers3 November 2026 — 17,477 subscribers4 November 2026 — 17,474 subscribers5 November 2026 — 17,470 subscribers17,4705 August 20265 November 2026
50 measurements spanning 92 days, net +47. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,415–17,487 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 50
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 15:0617,470-4
4 Nov 2026, 17:2617,474-3
3 Nov 2026, 14:5617,477-1
2 Nov 2026, 11:4617,478-1
1 Nov 2026, 11:2817,479+2
31 Oct 2026, 08:4017,477+3
30 Oct 2026, 05:2017,474+3
29 Oct 2026, 02:4017,471+1
27 Oct 2026, 21:2017,470+1
24 Oct 2026, 21:3717,469-1
23 Oct 2026, 19:2717,470-2
22 Oct 2026, 21:3117,472+36
21 Oct 2026, 15:0917,436-5
20 Oct 2026, 13:5017,441+1
19 Oct 2026, 16:3717,440+3
18 Oct 2026, 19:3017,437-1
17 Oct 2026, 19:5617,438-3
16 Oct 2026, 18:5717,441-7
14 Oct 2026, 18:1117,448-3
13 Oct 2026, 09:0417,451first reading

Engagement

76 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
50.2%
avg views ÷ 17,470 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,770
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 76 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 October 2026
Posts held76 (22 July 2026 – 21 October 2026)
Views total175,480
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 16:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,730
Links
≈1,750

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

21 Oct 2026, 12:45 UTC≈9,960 viewsread 5 November 2026

'Other numbers are largely unaffected, but anyone using '4' for their certificate key is urged to upgrade to '5'.'

19 Oct 2026, 12:15 UTC≈6,300 viewsread 5 November 2026

'I don't see why people have trouble doing this at room temperature. Using hot rivets would honestly have been MORE work.'

16 Oct 2026, 12:10 UTC≈8,600 viewsread 5 November 2026

'"I'm doing really well on the Hertzsprung-Russell academic diagram, which has spectral class on one axis and Rate My Professors rating on the other."'

14 Oct 2026, 20:35 UTC≈9,080 viewsread 5 November 2026

'Atmospheric transmission spectroscopy has revealed that the sunsets from the observatory are really pretty.'

Showing the 12 most recent of 76 posts we hold for @xkcdchannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Ordo Nexus
@nexus_search · 66,803
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 22 August 2026
Shower Thoughts 🚿
@showerthoughts · 35,928
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 1 September 2026
Programmer Jokes
@programmerjokes · 106,097
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
Hacker News
@hackernewslive · 29,038
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 10 September 2026
Ugolize
@Ugolize · 21,223
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 September 2026
Hacker News
@hacker_news_feed · 30,338
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 8 September 2026
manfred
@getmanfred · 18,911
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 4 October 2026
Programmer Humor
@programmer_humor · 21,333
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 23 September 2026
Factanza
@factanza · 18,776
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 4 October 2026
Science in telegram
@science · 123,090
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
il Post
@ilpost_official · 47,574
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 26 August 2026
Ministerio de Sanidad
@sanidadgob · 136,377
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 16 September 2026
Proton
@proton_privacy · 19,108
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 31 August 2026
The Devs
@thedevs · 31,950
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 5 September 2026
Linuxgram 🐧
@linuxgram · 72,395
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 19 August 2026
gencat
@gencat · 36,163
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 2 September 2026
eldiario.es
@eldiarioes · 44,732
Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Hacker News

This handle was named once in a Hacker News comment or story, via the public Algolia search API. HN comment and story text has no confirmed reuse licence, so nothing quoted from either is reproduced here — only that a mention exists, when, and by whom, with a link to read it at the source.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“xkcd” (@xkcdchannel), 17,470 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xkcdchannel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.