International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 41 days, net -18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,687–20,807 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 16:37
20,745
-4
15 Sept 2026, 12:59
20,749
+7
13 Sept 2026, 21:17
20,742
-8
12 Sept 2026, 06:55
20,750
+3
10 Sept 2026, 00:57
20,747
+46
6 Sept 2026, 18:21
20,701
-5
4 Sept 2026, 09:02
20,706
-5
3 Sept 2026, 00:03
20,711
-9
1 Sept 2026, 22:37
20,720
-13
31 Aug 2026, 20:04
20,733
+5
30 Aug 2026, 22:57
20,728
-8
29 Aug 2026, 19:28
20,736
+2
28 Aug 2026, 17:04
20,734
-4
27 Aug 2026, 17:18
20,738
-2
26 Aug 2026, 15:42
20,740
+3
25 Aug 2026, 14:44
20,737
-8
24 Aug 2026, 16:08
20,745
-15
23 Aug 2026, 03:24
20,760
-5
21 Aug 2026, 14:37
20,765
-6
20 Aug 2026, 15:04
20,771
first reading
Engagement
48 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.2%
avg views ÷ 20,745 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,330
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.64%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 48 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
48 (24 July 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total
21,003
Reactions total
764
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 18:20 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
51m 48s
Average length
2m 10s
Measured directly from 24 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,919 reactions across 48 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,355
27.5%
🤬
1,163
23.6%
❤
426
8.66%
👏
390
7.93%
😁
330
6.71%
💩
266
5.41%
🔥
143
2.91%
🫡
142
2.89%
😱
109
2.22%
🍾
104
2.11%
🤡
87
1.77%
👎
79
1.61%
😢
52
1.06%
🤔
44
0.894%
😈
39
0.793%
✍
23
0.468%
❤🔥
23
0.468%
🤪
21
0.427%
🎉
17
0.346%
🖕
17
0.346%
19 further kinds
89
1.81%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 48 of the 48 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,919 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Video de la destrucción de un vehículo aéreo no tripulado (UAV) ucraniano que se infiltró en el puerto de Sochi. El vehículo fue alcanzado por fuego de una ametralladora de gran calibre. El impacto preciso provocó la detonación del dron, pero queda la pregunta de cómo el UAV logró ingresar a la zona marítima del puerto.
@frentedeleste
🇨🇳🪖📰 China aprueba una reforma histórica de su ley de movilización militar
⚖️ El 28 de agosto de 2026, el Comité Permanente de la Asamblea Popular Nacional de China aprobó una revisión profunda de la Ley de Movilización de Defensa Nacional, la primera actualización importante desde 2010. Entra en vigor el 1 de octubre y consta de 14 capítulos y 82 artículos.
Qué establece:
El objetivo es que China pueda pasar rápid…
🌎💰 Estas serán las mayores economías de América Latina en 2030, según proyecciones basadas en datos del FMI
Un análisis de Visual Capitalist, basado en las proyecciones del Fondo Monetario Internacional (FMI), sitúa a Brasil como la mayor economía de LatAm en 2030, con un PIB estimado de 3,204 billones de dólares, lo que lo colocaría en el 8.º puesto mundial.
Le siguen México, con 2,549 billones de dólares y el 12.…
Rusia ya ha probado un sistema láser contra los drones ucranianos
Rusia ya está utilizando un sistema láser de última generación para defenderse de los drones ucranianos. El primer dispositivo se ha utilizado para proteger una instalación estratégica. El corresponsal de guerra Alexander Rogatkin ha publicado las primeras imágenes de su uso los días 30 y 31 de agosto.
https://wp.me/pci2hZ-h8Y
#Estrategia
Nuevamente, militares olvidados en las posiciones
Los familiares de los combatientes de la 14ª brigada mecanizada, que se encuentran en las posiciones desde hace 9 meses, están preocupados. Los militares están experimentando serios problemas de salud y de suministro.
Se les prometió una rotación después de 2 meses, pero ya han pasado 9 y la rotación no se ve por ningún lado. Aunque se ha restablecido la comunicació…
Servicio de la Inteligencia Exterior (SVR) de Rusia informa:
🇺🇦💣🇩🇪 ¿Adónde llevan las no huellas del sabotaje fallido en Leipzig?
Según datos de SVR, en Kíev están muy contentos con el efecto político y mediático, causado por un dron explosivo, encontrado en el la pista de estacionamiento de aviones de transportación ucranianos en el aeropuerto Leipzig/Galle el 5 de agosto de este año.
Sin esperar hasta los resul…
🇨🇳🏔️ Cómo China excavó el túnel más largo del mundo a través de unas montañas letales
- por Zhang Weiwei
https://geopoliticarugiente.com/2026/08/25/como-china-excavo-el-tunel-mas-largo-del-mundo-a-traves-de-unas-montanas-letales/
💥 Los guardias golpean con precisión.
El equipo "Mstya-S" perteneciente a la 288ª brigada de artillería de la guardia, del grupo "Oeste", ha destruido un centro de control de drones de las Fuerzas Armadas de Ucrania.
@frentedeleste
🌐 Una teoría temporal de la multipolarización
- por Kazuhiro Hayashida
https://geopoliticarugiente.com/2026/08/23/una-teoria-temporal-de-la-multipolarizacion/
🆘La superioridad militar global solo funciona cuando puede convertirse en la cantidad necesaria de armamento en el lugar adecuado y en el momento oportuno
Esta es precisamente la contradicción a la que se enfrenta hoy Estados Unidos, según se desprende de un artículo de The Wall Street Journal: aunque Washington posee el mayor potencial militar del mundo, está descubriendo gradualmente que el número de compromisos …
⚡️🤘💥🎬‼️🔥🤔 Hace ya más de 20 años ocurrió algo curioso en el mundo de la música, el grupo Metallica utilizó lo más granado (e inmoral por decir lo mínimo) de los trucos de mercadotecnia y psicología de masas para relanzar su carrera. En un primer momento nadie lo entendió puesto que lo que hacía el grupo que antes había vendido su gloria ahora era vender el más puro patetismo hasta el punto de la vergüenza ajena pero …
👏36🤡13🔥7😱5👌2👍1😍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @FrentedelEste. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Si volviera la Inquisición a Europa, ¿quién debería ir a la hoguera primero?
Kaya Kallas8%
Merz3%
Zelenski32%
Von der Leyen52%
Mi propia opción en los comentarios5%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@FrentedelEste named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@opinionesenrt named in 6 posts, 12 August 2026 – 24 August 2026
@frentedelesete named in 2 posts, 18 August 2026 – 29 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Líneas Rojas | ÚLTIMA HORA | GUERRAS 2026 @lineasrojas · 41,932 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 29 August 2026
A Toda Potencia | Irán - Israel | Ucrania - Rusia @atodapotencia · 43,432 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026
Ucraniando @ucraniando · 37,608 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 31 August 2026
El Ojo 👁 Noticias |Guerra en Irán| Guerra entre Rusia y Ucrania | China | EE.UU. | Putin | Trump | Venezuela @elOJOen · 84,926 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 17 August 2026
Soyuz 📚 Historia @SoyuzHistoria · 57,717 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 22 August 2026
Liu Sivaya @liusivaya · 129,212 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 August 2026
Blanco, azul y rojo (Rusia, cultura rusa, Putin, política rusa) @BlancoAzulRojo · 23,510 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 September 2026
Irina 🇷🇺 @Irinamar_Z · 78,129 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
ROKOT | TORMENTA @surf_noise_sp · 22,200 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 September 2026
InfoDefenseESPAÑOL @infodefSPAIN · 30,594 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 7 September 2026
Victor Ternovsky @victorternovsky · 24,797 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 15 September 2026
Wofnon @wofnon · 35,770 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026
NUEVO ORDEN MUNDIAL @nuevo_orden_mundial_canal · 23,812 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 17 September 2026
El Resumen Militar @elresumenmilitar · 26,965 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 September 2026
El Informador Global @informador_global · 28,794 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 9 September 2026
TASS - Agencia rusa de noticias @tass_es · 36,660 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 1 September 2026
DiegoEnLaLucha @diegoenlalucha · 74,940 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 August 2026
Inna Afinogenova @inafinogenova · 75,374 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
Guerras y Geopolíticas 🚀🔥 @guerrasygeo · 83,135 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 August 2026
Sabias que? @sabiasqueoficial · 37,903 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 31 August 2026
Ruben Gisbert @rubengisbertoficial · 73,013 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
HispanTV @HispanTVcanal · 55,709 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 23 August 2026
Ukraine Watch @ukraine_watch · 68,923 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 20 August 2026
⚠️ ARMAPEDIA - NOTICIAS EN VIVO - SIN CENSURA @armapedia · 177,925 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 51 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Frente del Este” (@FrentedelEste), 20,745 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FrentedelEste.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.