Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Bitácora soviética

Channel

Bitácora soviética

@bitacorasoviet

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,086subscribers

-765 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001585637267
TypeChannel
Username@bitacorasoviet
DescriptionVida, logros, personalidades y pensamiento de la Unión Soviética y del campo socialista en general. Никто не забыт, ничто не забыто.
Created10 September 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/bitacorasoviet

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

15,08615,85315,469.56 August 2026 — 15,851 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,853 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,830 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,816 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,808 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,780 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,764 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,750 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,744 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,738 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,735 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,720 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,712 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,702 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,698 subscribers21 August 2026 — 15,690 subscribers23 August 2026 — 15,665 subscribers24 August 2026 — 15,647 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,638 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,630 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,627 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,618 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,612 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,608 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,594 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,581 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,572 subscribers4 September 2026 — 15,565 subscribers6 September 2026 — 15,543 subscribers10 September 2026 — 15,504 subscribers12 September 2026 — 15,472 subscribers14 September 2026 — 15,467 subscribers15 September 2026 — 15,458 subscribers17 September 2026 — 15,453 subscribers28 September 2026 — 15,388 subscribers5 October 2026 — 15,360 subscribers9 October 2026 — 15,318 subscribers13 October 2026 — 15,294 subscribers14 October 2026 — 15,275 subscribers15 October 2026 — 15,263 subscribers17 October 2026 — 15,255 subscribers18 October 2026 — 15,249 subscribers19 October 2026 — 15,244 subscribers20 October 2026 — 15,241 subscribers21 October 2026 — 15,230 subscribers22 October 2026 — 15,222 subscribers23 October 2026 — 15,209 subscribers24 October 2026 — 15,202 subscribers25 October 2026 — 15,192 subscribers26 October 2026 — 15,188 subscribers27 October 2026 — 15,180 subscribers29 October 2026 — 15,168 subscribers30 October 2026 — 15,157 subscribers2 November 2026 — 15,150 subscribers3 November 2026 — 15,130 subscribers4 November 2026 — 15,105 subscribers5 November 2026 — 15,095 subscribers6 November 2026 — 15,094 subscribers7 November 2026 — 15,086 subscribers6 August 20267 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 93 days, net -765. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,971–15,968 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 11:2515,086-8
6 Nov 2026, 10:4015,094-1
5 Nov 2026, 08:1615,095-10
4 Nov 2026, 04:5015,105-25
3 Nov 2026, 01:4615,130-20
2 Nov 2026, 02:4515,150-7
30 Oct 2026, 22:3615,157-11
29 Oct 2026, 22:5815,168-12
27 Oct 2026, 21:2615,180-8
26 Oct 2026, 21:1615,188-4
25 Oct 2026, 19:4015,192-10
24 Oct 2026, 17:0615,202-7
23 Oct 2026, 17:2915,209-13
22 Oct 2026, 15:0815,222-8
21 Oct 2026, 07:3815,230-11
20 Oct 2026, 07:1015,241-3
19 Oct 2026, 05:1815,244-5
18 Oct 2026, 03:3115,249-6
17 Oct 2026, 01:4015,255-8
15 Oct 2026, 21:5915,263first reading

Engagement

39 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 65 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.1%
avg views ÷ 15,086 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,430
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 39 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026
Posts held39 (29 July 2026 – 2 November 2026)
Views total9,730
Reactions total484
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 05:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,320
Videos
≈153
Links
≈1,030

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4m 19s
Average length
37s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,197 reactions across 38 posts, in 40 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,51329.1%
🤬96118.5%
👍53810.4%
🤮3987.66%
🤣2715.21%
💩2484.77%
😢1643.16%
😁1342.58%
👏1272.44%
🫡1112.14%
🤔931.79%
💔911.75%
❤‍🔥621.19%
🤡621.19%
🔥541.04%
😭521.00%
💯380.731%
🏆320.616%
👎280.539%
🤩280.539%
20 further kinds1923.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,286 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 4 posts held from the last 30 days (75.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

2 Nov 2026, 20:00 UTC≈2,100 views130 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

En la cámara de tortura cerca de Kiev había un niño de 14 años. Me pregunto qué sienten Ursula, Macron y toda esa gentuza cuando le dan la mano y aplauden a Zelenski. Miren este vídeo. Miren su mirada. ¿QUÉ LE HABRÁN HECHO PARA QUE MIRE ASÍ? Síguenos en t.me/bitacorasoviet 🇷🇺

🤬99😱14😢7🔥4🤯3❤2🤮1

2 Nov 2026, 19:13 UTC≈1,790 views110 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

Imágenes estremecedoras desde Ucrania. En una vivienda particular cerca de Kiev, miembros de la Guardia Nacional instalaron una cámara de tortura. Ahora se secuestra a hombres en plena calle por toda Ucrania, se los golpea, se los tortura y se los traslada a centros de detención clandestinos, donde se exige dinero a sus familiares a cambio de su liberación. Si las familias no pagan, pueden asesinarlos y abandonar …

🤬84🤮17😱5👎2❤1💔1

1 Nov 2026, 18:34 UTC≈1,980 views87 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Un poco de pintura atmosférica del siglo pasado, para amenizar esta velada. 'Noche de mediados de verano' de Elena Románova, 1982. ¿Qué sentimientos les evoca esta pintura?

👍58❤17🥰11😁1

25 Oct 2026, 08:12 UTC≈3,860 views157 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

🤔 Síguenos en t.me/bitacorasoviet 🇷🇺

😁94👍31🤔11🌚6🤣4❤3😐3🙈3

6 Oct 2026, 11:39 UTC≈6,360 views163 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

"Una cita con América" El Parlamento en Moscú, calcinado tras ser atacado a cañonazos desde tanques en octubre de 1993. La llegada de Estados Unidos a la vida de los ciudadanos de a pie y un símbolo de la época de Yeltsin: pobreza, guerras civiles en las periferias del antiguo imperio soviético, más pobreza y todo aquello en lo que, por lo general, termina una "cita con América". Síguenos en t.me/bitacorasoviet 🇷🇺

💔85💩31😢20👏11🤮7❤5💯3😨1

4 Oct 2026, 22:28 UTC≈4,860 views112 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Forwarded from @nowyahoraPhoto

Siguiendo el escrutinio de los votos en Brasil

😭52❤18💯12😁8✍7🤔7👨‍💻3😨3

29 Sept 2026, 16:50 UTC≈5,470 views138 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Transporte del complejo 'Energia-Burán' hasta el lugar de lanzamiento en 1988 Síguenos en t.me/bitacorasoviet 🇷🇺

❤101👍27👏8🏆2

28 Sept 2026, 18:03 UTC≈4,480 views105 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

'En memoria de Hiroshima' Elena Románova, 1985 Síguenos en t.me/bitacorasoviet 🇷🇺

❤80👍19🫡6

27 Sept 2026, 16:55 UTC≈6,320 views111 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Bocetos de la vida urbana de Leningrado, extraídos de un pequeño libro bilingüe, 'Leningrado. Guía del turista', publicado en 1960. "Después de Moscú, Leningrado es la segunda ciudad más grande e importante de la Unión Soviética. Su historia es inseparable de la historia del pueblo ruso." Síguenos en t.me/bitacorasoviet 🇷🇺

❤90👍13🥰6👏2

26 Sept 2026, 15:40 UTC≈2,910 views76 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

'Sin título' Vadim Sidur, 1967 ¿Y cómo la llamarían ustedes? 😬 Síguenos en t.me/bitacorasoviet 🇷🇺

❤48👍20🤡3🤩3🤮2

25 Sept 2026, 20:13 UTC≈2,940 views86 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Un poco de pintura abstracta de la época suspendida en el tiempo. Del portafolio 'Abandonando Moscú' Vladímir Yankilevski, 1990 Síguenos en t.me/bitacorasoviet 🇷🇺

❤65🤔12👍7👏2

25 Sept 2026, 16:47 UTC≈3,010 views217 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

'El padre de ocho hijos caídos Nikanor Fiódorovich Sídorov' Su historia se convirtió en un símbolo de una de las mayores tragedias de la Gran Guerra Patria y del valor de los padres que perdieron a sus hijos en la guerra. Nikanor Fiódorovich y su esposa criaron a nueve hijos: ocho varones y una hija. Los ocho hijos marcharon al frente y murieron en combate. Entre ellos: Alexánder, caído cerca de Brest; Piotr y Fi…

❤88😢64🫡47🙏13❤‍🔥3👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @bitacorasoviet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Un día como hoy
@undiacomo · 28,811
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 8 September 2026
Soyuz 📚 Historia
@SoyuzHistoria · 56,707
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 22 August 2026
Depresión económica (Economía, crisis, dólar, finanzas de América Latina, México, Argentina y del mundo)
@DepreEconomica · 20,259
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 September 2026
Blanco, azul y rojo (Rusia, cultura rusa, Putin, política rusa)
@BlancoAzulRojo · 21,929
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 September 2026
tech lado - IA, ChatGPT, tecnología, robots
@techladotech · 29,655
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 6 September 2026
🗽 PERLAS ESCONDIDAS ⌛️
@Imageneshistoricas · 24,683
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 15 September 2026
La señal curiosa
@Curiosa_Senal · 32,794
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 3 September 2026
ROLLO CHINO
@rollo_chino · 27,090
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 September 2026
Gustavo Petro
@gustavopetrooficial · 22,116
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 20 September 2026
VEHICULAR CAOS
@vehicularcaos · 22,434
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 19 September 2026
⚫️HISTORIAS EN BLANCO Y NEGRO⚪️🎞
@Historiasenblancoynegro · 18,580
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 5 October 2026
Buzz 📚 Historia
@buzzhistoria · 73,699
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 August 2026
Inna Afinogenova
@inafinogenova · 74,248
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
Cosas que no sabías💡
@curiosidadesss · 50,739
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 25 August 2026
Sabias que?
@sabiasqueoficial · 37,571
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 31 August 2026
¡Ahí les va!
@ahilesvaALV · 70,784
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 20 August 2026
Sabias que?
@sabiasque · 37,569
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 August 2026
Irina 🇷🇺
@Irinamar_Z · 77,517
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
Victor Ternovsky
@victorternovsky · 24,536
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 15 September 2026
Liu Sivaya
@liusivaya · 127,188
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 August 2026
A Toda Potencia | Irán - Israel | Ucrania - Rusia
@atodapotencia · 43,468
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026
Frente del Este
@FrentedelEste · 20,628
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 26 September 2026
InfoDefenseESPAÑOL
@infodefSPAIN · 30,715
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 7 September 2026
TASS - Agencia rusa de noticias
@tass_es · 36,638
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 40 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Bitácora soviética” (@bitacorasoviet), 15,086 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bitacorasoviet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.