Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Adams Economics

Channel

Adams Economics

@AdamsEconomics

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,457subscribers

-16 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001570647760
TypeChannel
Username@AdamsEconomics
Created11 January 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/AdamsEconomics

Growth

6,4526,4766,4646 August 2026 — 6,473 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,473 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,476 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,468 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,474 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,467 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,470 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,461 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,463 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,452 subscribers4 September 2026 — 6,457 subscribers6,4576 August 20264 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 29 days, net -16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,448–6,480 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 09:426,457+5
1 Sept 2026, 08:076,452-11
26 Aug 2026, 01:026,463+2
23 Aug 2026, 02:236,461-9
19 Aug 2026, 19:376,470+3
16 Aug 2026, 21:386,467-7
13 Aug 2026, 07:556,474+6
9 Aug 2026, 23:366,468-8
6 Aug 2026, 18:406,476+3
6 Aug 2026, 10:306,473no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:556,473first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 17 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.1%
avg views ÷ 6,457 subscribers
Avg views / post
973
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.84%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held23 (17 June 202611 August 2026)
Views total2,919
Reactions total83
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:07 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,122 reactions across 23 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍37833.7%
19617.5%
🔥978.65%
💯938.29%
🤬897.93%
🤣696.15%
👏353.12%
🥱232.05%
🤔221.96%
🤡221.96%
🤮191.69%
🤯191.69%
🖕110.98%
😁100.891%
😱100.891%
💩80.713%
👎70.624%
🫡70.624%
😴40.357%
😢10.089%
2 further kinds20.178%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,122 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 05:22 UTC829 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026

TWO QUESTIONS? 🤔 1) From 1985 to 2026, how many abortions have been performed in Australia? 2) assume that these individuals were not aborted & those over the age of 18 (born before 2008) had their own kids. What total impact has abortion had on Australia’s population in the past 41 years?

👍165🔥1🥱1😢1

Signed John Adams

10 Aug 2026, 09:35 UTC≈1,070 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤯13🤬11🤔3😱31

Signed John Adams

10 Aug 2026, 09:35 UTC≈1,020 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💯20👍4🤔21🤡1

Signed John Adams

6 Aug 2026, 09:25 UTC≈1,950 views59 reactionsread 12 August 2026

How does the ABC say it is conspiracy theory & yet the Melbourne Age pushes 15 minute cities?

👍38💯17🥱21🤔1

Signed John Adams

6 Aug 2026, 09:25 UTC≈1,890 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🖕11🔥9😁42🤔2

Signed John Adams

6 Aug 2026, 09:25 UTC≈1,700 views29 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥147👍7💩1

Signed John Adams

5 Aug 2026, 23:01 UTC≈1,620 views55 reactionsread 12 August 2026

This has to be the quote of the day. This is Ned Kelly describing Victorian Police in 1879: “A parcel of big ugly fat-necked wombat headed big bellied magpie legged narrow hipped splaw-footed sons of Irish Bailiffs or english landlords.”

🤣2716💯8👍4

Signed John Adams

30 Jul 2026, 09:51 UTC≈2,650 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Taylor is cooked

🔥17🥱5👍42

Signed John Adams

26 Jul 2026, 02:46 UTC≈3,210 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

QUESTION? 🤔 Anton in this group says that I won’t touch particular subjects!!! What subjects do people want me to talk about? I am all ears!

8🤷‍♂1

Signed John Adams

25 Jul 2026, 23:49 UTC≈3,120 views42 reactionsread 12 August 2026

NOTE! ✍️ On Friday, I spoke with One Nation staff & they are aware of the contradiction between the narrative that One Nation is controlled by Israel & Jews & the other which is they are anti-semitic because they believe that Jews control the international financial system & therefore are against Jewish power. I know the specific people behind the One Nation operation. I am in contact with many of them. The myste

👍21🤡8🤣53🔥2🥱2🤔1

Signed John Adams

25 Jul 2026, 06:05 UTC≈2,690 views68 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Yesterday I attended a special function in Brisbane with Pauline Hanson.

👍4019🤮5🥱3🔥1

Signed John Adams

25 Jul 2026, 06:05 UTC≈2,570 views58 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

29👍21🤮7🥱1

Signed John Adams

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @AdamsEconomics. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Chef Pete Evans
@ChefPeteEvans · 29,302
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 8 September 2026
AustraliaOneParty_Official
@australiaoneparty_official · 33,190
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Adams Economics” (@AdamsEconomics), 6,457 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AdamsEconomics.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.