Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Lucas Leiroz (Лукас Лейрос)

Channel

Lucas Leiroz (Лукас Лейрос)

@lucasleiroz

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,700subscribers

+428 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001733665935
TypeChannel
Username@lucasleiroz
Created27 August 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/lucasleiroz

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 28% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,2633,7783,520.56 August 2026 — 3,272 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,272 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,271 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,267 subscribers15 August 2026 — 3,263 subscribers19 August 2026 — 3,778 subscribers22 August 2026 — 3,760 subscribers25 August 2026 — 3,748 subscribers27 August 2026 — 3,745 subscribers30 August 2026 — 3,741 subscribers3 September 2026 — 3,737 subscribers7 September 2026 — 3,722 subscribers11 September 2026 — 3,711 subscribers14 September 2026 — 3,704 subscribers19 September 2026 — 3,700 subscribers3,7006 August 202619 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 44 days, net +428. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,186–3,855 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 12:193,700-4
14 Sept 2026, 21:203,704-7
11 Sept 2026, 15:413,711-11
7 Sept 2026, 09:553,722-15
3 Sept 2026, 00:433,737-4
30 Aug 2026, 23:253,741-4
27 Aug 2026, 22:583,745-3
25 Aug 2026, 05:523,748-12
22 Aug 2026, 03:343,760-18
19 Aug 2026, 01:243,778+515
15 Aug 2026, 18:463,263-4
12 Aug 2026, 09:153,267-4
9 Aug 2026, 09:523,271-1
6 Aug 2026, 04:483,272no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:173,272first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 26 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

72 reactions across 21 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4663.9%
🔥1318.1%
❤811.1%
👏34.17%
💯22.78%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 83 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 16:40 UTC256 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

My latest for InfoBRICS | Energy crisis hurts US American governor comments on the impact of global geopolitics on the domestic oil supply in the US. https://infobrics.org/en/post/102728

👍2

7 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC88 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @SCF_Portuguese

Os EUA agem de forma injusta, mas o Brasil é responsável por sua própria situação econômica. Escreve Lucas Leiroz. @SCF_Portuguese

❤1💯1

7 Aug 2026, 12:52 UTC111 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @middle_east_spectatorPhoto

— 🇸🇦/🇵🇰/🇹🇷 NEW: Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Turkey have signed a trilateral defense pact @Middle_East_Spectator

6 Aug 2026, 19:53 UTC405 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

My latest for InfoBRICS | Ukrainian ambassador interferes in German internal affairs The Ukrainian embassy in Berlin seeks to influence the decision of German voters. https://infobrics.org/en/post/102716

👍3

6 Aug 2026, 15:49 UTC179 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @strategic_culturePhoto

🇧🇷🇮🇷 Brazil spends 60% more on defense than Iran ($214 billion vs. $134 billion over the past decade), yet Brazil is militarily weaker. Brazil allocates most of its budget to salaries and pensions, leaving little for R&D and procurement. Iran, under sanctions, invested heavily in building a domestic defense industrial base—missiles, drones, and local production. Financial resources alone do not guarantee military p…

👍5

6 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC174 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @SCF_Portuguese

No Brasil, gasta-se mais com “defesa” do que no Irã, mas o Brasil é mais fraco que o Irã. Escreve Lucas Leiroz. @SCF_Portuguese

👍8

5 Aug 2026, 23:59 UTC216 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

O povo não tem memória, mas eu tenho. Bolsonaro e Biden tiveram o mesmo arranca-rabo que Lula e Trump estão tendo agora. Bolsonaro chegou a insinuar que o Brasil "iria à guerra com EUA". Não há tensão alguma. A Sexta República é uma simulação. https://www.dw.com/pt-br/bolsonaro-insinua-conflito-militar-com-os-eua-pela-amazônia/a-55560913

👍11

5 Aug 2026, 22:52 UTC209 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Estarei no GGN daqui a pouco. https://www.youtube.com/live/uYZCd111VqY?is=UHd1DrQmvbkST7eM

👏3

5 Aug 2026, 12:41 UTC319 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

My latest for InfoBRICS | NATO will not accept Ukraine – Zaluzhny The Kiev regime is not expected to become a member of the Western alliance. https://infobrics.org/en/post/102695

👍3

4 Aug 2026, 23:26 UTC216 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @middle_east_spectator

—❗️🇮🇷/🇦🇪 BREAKING: Exclusive sources tell Middle East Spectator at least 3 explosions were heard in Dubai, and a column of smoke can be seen The cause is currently unknown. @Middle_East_Spectator

🔥2

4 Aug 2026, 21:07 UTC222 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @middle_east_spectatorPhoto

—❗️🇺🇸/🇮🇷 BREAKING: The U.S. military has depleted nearly 80% of its THAAD missile interceptors in the war with Iran, sources tell CNN The U.S. has also used up roughly half of its Patriot interceptor missiles, seriously limiting the capability to intercept Iranian ballistic missiles fired at Gulf states and Israel. The Pentagon has warned President Trump repeatedly in recent weeks that the low stockpiles could carr…

🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 14:28 UTC223 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @middle_east_spectator

—❗️🇸🇦/🇾🇪/🇮🇳 BREAKING: An Indian-flagged tanker, carrying oil from Saudi Arabia, was blown up with a Yemeni suicide boat 13 nautical miles off Hodeidah in Bab Al-Mandab @Middle_East_Spectator

🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @lucasleiroz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Canal ARTE DA GUERRA
@canalartedaguerra · 27,449
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 10 September 2026
Pepe Escobar
@rocknrollgeopolitics · 66,422
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
CENTRAL GEOPOLÍTICA | INTEL & DEFESA
@CentralGeopolitica · 26,585
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 12 September 2026
Alexander Dugin
@Dugin_Aleksandr · 22,458
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 20 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Lucas Leiroz (Лукас Лейрос)” (@lucasleiroz), 3,700 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lucasleiroz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.