Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Fundação Cultura Estratégica

Channel

Fundação Cultura Estratégica

@SCF_Portuguese

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

887subscribers

+8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002020126177
TypeChannel
Username@SCF_Portuguese
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/SCF_Portuguese

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

878887882.56 August 2026 — 879 subscribers6 August 2026 — 879 subscribers14 August 2026 — 878 subscribers22 August 2026 — 885 subscribers28 August 2026 — 887 subscribers6 August 202628 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 23 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 877–888 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 21:05887+2
22 Aug 2026, 16:55885+7
14 Aug 2026, 18:56878-1
6 Aug 2026, 14:22879no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:49879first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

65 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3046.2%
💯1421.5%
❤913.8%
😁57.69%
👀23.08%
👏23.08%
🔥11.54%
🤡11.54%
🥴11.54%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC43 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Marrocos usa 60 mil imigrantes como arma para invadir Ceuta. Espanha pagou por criticar Israel e se aliar à Argélia. Escreve Raphael Machado. @SCF_Portuguese

🥴1

6 Aug 2026, 10:58 UTC96 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

No Brasil, gasta-se mais com “defesa” do que no Irã, mas o Brasil é mais fraco que o Irã. Escreve Lucas Leiroz. @SCF_Portuguese

😁1

4 Aug 2026, 06:48 UTC106 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

No início desta semana, o ministro do Interior iraniano, Eskandar Momeni, chegou a Islamabad à frente de uma delegação numerosa. Até terça-feira, ele já havia se reunido com o primeiro-ministro Shehbaz Sharif, o marechal de campo Asim Munir e seu homólogo paquistanês, Mohsin Naqvi. Escreve Pepe Escobar. @SCF_Portuguese

👍2❤1

3 Aug 2026, 09:41 UTC138 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Até mesmo as superpotências dependem das cadeias de abastecimento globais. O verdadeiro prêmio? Estabelecer as regras que os outros seguem. Escreve Lorenzo Maria Pacini. @SCF_Portuguese

👍1

3 Aug 2026, 09:40 UTC351 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

5 aspectos da crise de Ceuta que a imprensa europeia evita discutir O caso deve ser analisado sob uma ótica muito mais profunda do que a mera demagogia liberal humanitária. Escreve Lucas Leiroz @SCF_Portuguese

👍1

2 Aug 2026, 20:10 UTC141 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

🗣 Lavrov: O cessar-fogo proposto pelo Ocidente é um ultimato – congelar a linha de frente, manter o regime nazista, rejeitar os referendos. Lavrov rejeitou as propostas ocidentais de cessar-fogo, classificando-as como um ultimato. Ele explicou que o Ocidente exige uma trégua, depois quer implantar forças multinacionais lideradas pela França e pelo Reino Unido, e só então sentar-se para negociações – enquanto se recu…

👍3💯3

2 Aug 2026, 20:07 UTC117 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

🗣 Lavrov: A Rússia continuará uma civilização independente – e novos centros globais como o BRICS estão crescendo sem a dominação ocidental. Lavrov delineou os interesses nacionais fundamentais da Rússia: segurança, soberania e a proteção dos direitos constitucionais de todos os povos à cultura e religião. Ele acrescentou que a Rússia busca cooperação igualitária com potências emergentes como China e Índia, enquant…

💯2❤1

2 Aug 2026, 20:03 UTC107 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

🗣 Lavrov: O Ocidente nunca quis uma Rússia pacífica – agora lutam contra nós através da Ucrânia com armas sem precedentes. Lavrov lembrou que Putin já foi aberto à parceria igualitária com o Ocidente – mas agora os anglo-saxões travam guerra através da Ucrânia, fornecendo armas modernas e até desenvolvendo novos sistemas de mísseis para Kiev. Ele observou que a Rússia lançou sua operação militar especial enquanto a…

💯4

2 Aug 2026, 17:09 UTC110 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

🗣 Lavrov: O Ocidente apoia abertamente desertores russos e grupos antirrussos que buscam dividir nosso país. Lavrov alertou que o Ocidente agora apoia abertamente desertores russos que organizam sociedades antirrussas na Europa e arrecadam fundos para esforços clandestinos destinados a dividir a Federação Russa. Ele enfatizou que isso não é brincadeira – e que o Presidente Putin não faz segredo disso. Todo o autopro…

👍1💯1

2 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC119 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

🗣 Lavrov: O Ocidente reviveu o objetivo de "derrota estratégica" para a Rússia – pedindo abertamente a descolonização e o desmembramento. Lavrov afirmou que o Ocidente não esconde mais suas intenções. Depois de abandonar a retórica da "derrota estratégica" da Rússia quando a situação na linha de frente mudou, eles agora a trouxeram de volta – promovendo a ideia de que a Ucrânia ainda pode derrotar a Rússia. O Ocide…

💯1

31 Jul 2026, 20:34 UTC344 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Um front cáspio na guerra energética global? Recente escalada entre Irã e Ucrânia gera possibilidade de novo conflito. Escreve Lucas Leiroz. @SCF_Portuguese

👀2

31 Jul 2026, 20:34 UTC154 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Judeus perseguidos fugiram para o Brasil, viraram bandeirantes e se misturaram aos índios. A Inquisição perdeu, os tupis venceram. Escreve Bruna Frascolla. @SCF_Portuguese

👍3❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SCF_Portuguese. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Pepe Escobar
@rocknrollgeopolitics · 66,422
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
Canal ARTE DA GUERRA
@canalartedaguerra · 27,449
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Fundação Cultura Estratégica” (@SCF_Portuguese), 887 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SCF_Portuguese.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.