Channel
@Truthcast
On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
15,709subscribers
-794 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001168815860 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Truthcast |
| Description | Patriot-Switch.com to make a difference! Truth is uncensored every day! You took the red pill, what’s next? We post information to research, learn, and share… in order to learn the truth and wake up others! Join our backup @RedPillPharmacy as well. |
| Created | 27 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Truthcast |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Nov 2026, 12:30 | 15,709 | -2 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 08:57 | 15,711 | -2 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 08:40 | 15,713 | -4 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 10:04 | 15,717 | -6 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 12:38 | 15,723 | -13 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 09:29 | 15,736 | -8 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 10:06 | 15,744 | -9 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 11:26 | 15,753 | -5 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 12:49 | 15,758 | -17 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 11:44 | 15,775 | -9 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 14:08 | 15,784 | -11 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 15:06 | 15,795 | -3 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 11:58 | 15,798 | -13 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 05:09 | 15,811 | -3 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 05:37 | 15,814 | -16 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 02:41 | 15,830 | -9 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 04:49 | 15,839 | -3 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 07:08 | 15,842 | -4 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 10:04 | 15,846 | -11 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 11:31 | 15,857 | first reading |
887 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 46 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 887 (6 August 2026 – 4 November 2026) |
| Views total | 678 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Nov 2026, 04:27 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 502 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
24 reactions across 19 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9 | 37.5% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 16.7% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 12.5% | |
| 🤬 | 2 | 8.33% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 4.17% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 4.17% | |
| 😈 | 1 | 4.17% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 4.17% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 4.17% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 4.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 887 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 887 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇺🇸⚔️🛡️🇺🇸⚔️🛡️🇺🇸⚔️🛡️🇺🇸⚔️🛡️🇺🇸⚔️ If you’re wyt, you🫵🏻 best Keep your rifle by your side! Get connected with your local self sustaining & tactical community. 🤝 If you don’t have one, FORM one and recruit your family members, relatives, neighbors etc. 🫵🏻❌Do not underestimate your enemies ie Edomite Canaanite fake joos 🐍, thieving dangerous nonwyt parasite scums & wytracetraitors. They have the same weapons or better as…
🔥1
On Genesis, Part 21: The Call of Abraham ♻️🔔🛰️PLEASE WATCH & SHARE RELATED VIDEOS HERE 👇🏻 https://t.me/GodlyEndTimeTruth/57365 William Finck The Time Of The End II JOIN🔥🔥🔥SHARE FAR & WIDE @GodlyEndTimeTruth @GodlyEndTimeTruthChat
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
You can see here the condition that he is leaving the puppies in This is his tiktok https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTfow5Dd2/
Disgusting mudshark Your🫵🏻 white kids become what they are exposed to and who they surround themselves with ‼️‼️‼️
Video, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
"We want it back."
That's no American. That's a typical N!
Miscegenation is a crime against your people.
This is a scene from a 2012 BBC series called “Inside Men” the Female in the photo is playing a Polish Lady. To Polish People such a communion is abhorrent to the majority of the Polish Population. Yet the BBC just had to mock white People and push their Kalergi Plan propaganda even back then, they truly are a Vile Demonic Evil Propaganda arm of Jizrael and all Western Governments and across the Commonwealth who have…
Showing the 12 most recent of 887 posts we hold for @Truthcast. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Republishes 143 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones this channel has forwarded most; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Truthcast named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Red Pill Truth” (@Truthcast), 15,709 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Truthcast.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.