Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Edom is Idumea

Channel

Edom is Idumea

@edomisidumea

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

446subscribers

+65 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003721222719
TypeChannel
Username@edomisidumea
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/edomisidumea

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

381446413.57 August 2026 — 381 subscribers7 August 2026 — 381 subscribers15 August 2026 — 420 subscribers21 August 2026 — 424 subscribers28 August 2026 — 430 subscribers6 September 2026 — 440 subscribers14 September 2026 — 446 subscribers7 August 202614 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 38 days, net +65. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 371–456 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 08:37446+6
6 Sept 2026, 00:40440+10
28 Aug 2026, 13:13430+6
21 Aug 2026, 15:36424+4
15 Aug 2026, 00:17420+39
7 Aug 2026, 18:23381no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:03381first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🙏1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 19:39 UTC57 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Edomite Iudish aka Yiddish (G2b-M377) which is half Canaanite (J1/J2) like Herod was. J1 includes Somalis, Sudanese, Saudis, Houthis, Alawis, Bantu, Lemba clan Buba. J1 and J2 are Canaanite, not Israelite. G2a centers on Ararat, Gobekli Tepe, Northern Iran and the Caucasus. G2a was the Hebrews known as Israelites, who left Ararat due to the Kura-Araxes flood of J2 Canaanites who brought Mokhrablur ritual altars in

6 Aug 2026, 05:15 UTC70 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Hebrew G2a on the left and Canaanite J1 on the right, J1 are half brothers of G2b-M377 e.g. Roth, Herzl, Soros/Schwab etc.

5 Aug 2026, 20:26 UTC88 viewsread 7 August 2026

Responding to "maybe Herzl was a clone" They've been cloning since 1938 I think, so the 1897 Zionist Congress where they announced "antisemitism will be our most useful tool" was well in advance. Plus it's no mystery. His real name is Loebl, which as I said is a haplogroup G2b-M377 surname along with Roth, Soros/Schwab both Schwartz, Rosenberg e.g. Orsini-Rosenberg, Cohen, Jacobs, Miller, Cooper, Fink, Khan, Bauer,

5 Aug 2026, 19:38 UTC42 viewsread 7 August 2026

Responding to "this is the perversion of Zionism" Yes. It's becoming more mainstream now and known as Revisionist Zionism. Douglas Reed captured it well in his book Controversy of Zion, which he held back from publishing until after his death. In the end though, the Herodians (Idumeans aka Edomites, half Canaanite) never died out. 70AD was an inside job, Herod himself was half Nabataean Kohanim/Geonim aka Canaanit

5 Aug 2026, 19:35 UTC44 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Bad news about Moseley, it's a G2b-M377 name (traceable to Jordan aka Edom, Dagestan, Karlani Afghanistan, and Southern Italy). Confirmed on familytreedna pages 18 and 19: https://www.familytreedna.com/public/G2c/default.aspx?section=ysnp Even if he was anti war, he was probably controlled ops. His physiognomy does indicate that he was half Canaanite. Which is standard for 'White Arabs' aka Edomites.

5 Aug 2026, 17:25 UTC62 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Responding to "I can't believe we let a handful of xyz do this to us" What if they're a front for a pan-Canaanite empire rebuilding neo-Babylonia like the two rivers and Star of Baalbek on their flag suggest. Oh, wait..

🙏1

5 Aug 2026, 15:11 UTC53 viewsread 7 August 2026

Solomon is likely Shoshenq, a Nubian non. This was post 1600BC, the Santorini volcano that also probably caused the Exodus. Anyway, that's why he dabbled in dark arts and was a polygamist. Tidwell is a polygamist too, and seems to avoid the Ashkenazi Modal Haplotype in his analysis of Edom.

5 Aug 2026, 02:35 UTC63 viewsread 7 August 2026

It's facts I'm afraid. Only the Macaque and Bonobo are superarchaic species. Boondog and Orangape are new kids on the block. Let's see if they're here as long as us.

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @edomisidumea. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Edom is Idumea” (@edomisidumea), 446 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/edomisidumea.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.