Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Martinez Politics

Channel

Martinez Politics

@martinezpolitix

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,499subscribers

-22 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001810192479
TypeChannel
Username@martinezpolitix
Created25 December 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/martinezpolitix

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8,4998,5598,5296 August 2026 — 8,521 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,521 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,522 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,530 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,556 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,559 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,557 subscribers22 August 2026 — 8,553 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,538 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,539 subscribers31 August 2026 — 8,536 subscribers4 September 2026 — 8,542 subscribers9 September 2026 — 8,528 subscribers13 September 2026 — 8,520 subscribers18 September 2026 — 8,499 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 43 days, net -22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,490–8,568 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 10:028,499-21
13 Sept 2026, 17:598,520-8
9 Sept 2026, 13:008,528-14
4 Sept 2026, 02:378,542+6
31 Aug 2026, 15:478,536-3
29 Aug 2026, 01:188,539+1
26 Aug 2026, 01:178,538-15
22 Aug 2026, 20:298,553-4
19 Aug 2026, 19:458,557-2
16 Aug 2026, 15:448,559+3
13 Aug 2026, 06:278,556+26
10 Aug 2026, 01:318,530+8
7 Aug 2026, 00:038,522+1
6 Aug 2026, 10:188,521no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:598,521first reading

Engagement

132 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.73%
avg views ÷ 8,499 subscribers
Avg views / post
657
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.69%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 132 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held132 (4 August 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total10,513
Reactions total386
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 17:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2h 03m
Average length
2m 34s

Measured directly from 48 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,353 reactions across 126 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯69229.4%
👍43918.7%
❤25310.8%
😁2068.75%
🤮1908.07%
🤣1415.99%
🔥662.80%
🤬652.76%
👏582.46%
🍌451.91%
😡361.53%
🌚341.44%
🏆301.27%
👌281.19%
⚡230.977%
💔160.68%
👀70.297%
🤔60.255%
🤯60.255%
🎉40.17%
4 further kinds80.34%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 126 of the 132 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,353 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 132 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 16:55 UTC55 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

▶️ Stream 4PM ET / 10PM CET Friday chill stream covering some news and chat roulette. YOUTUBE 📺 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WzejQIJpFUU RUMBLE 📺 https://rumble.com/v7erwwk-martinez-politics-aug-28-2026-friday-chill-stream.html Superchats 💵https://streamlabs.com/martpolx/tip

28 Aug 2026, 12:26 UTC531 views52 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

NO feminists stood with Irina Zarutska who was murdered by a racist African-American. Yet MANY feminists stand with psychopathic child killer Lindsay Clancy and are trying to scapegoat her husband. Feminism is demonic!

💯43❤7⚡2

28 Aug 2026, 11:42 UTC405 views6 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Tates lawyer is the sleaziest piece of garbage in the world https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMFwY5NF1YU

👍6

28 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC442 views43 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

If a man did this he would go straight to jail. This is child abuse. Female privilege allows women to get away with child abuse, domestic abuse of spouses and all sorts of crimes. Women are OUT OF CONTROL!

🤬35💯5🤣2🤮1

27 Aug 2026, 23:37 UTC597 views17 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

"Tucker Carlson is a piece of crap" Italian guy knows the score on the Russian Shill Network https://substack.com/@martpolx

👍17

27 Aug 2026, 15:56 UTC830 views10 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

"Sex is a binary and race is a spectrum" Trans idiot engages can't understand basic facts and logic

😁10

27 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC684 views10 reactionsread 28 August 2026

▶️ NEW STREAM Fight Sport joins to discuss the demonic e-girl grifter Syrian Terrorist Girl; she is an open-book operative of Russia, Iran and Hezbollah; she flows in the same circles as all the Russia-shills in Alt-Media; she hates Whites and the West while promoting “multipolarity” so her Brown Clown coalition can triumph and submerge the world in darkness; we follow that lead into Mark Collett, an anti-Western tr…

🔥7🏆3

26 Aug 2026, 23:12 UTC801 views35 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁26🌚4💯3😡2

26 Aug 2026, 19:53 UTC746 views26 reactionsread 28 August 2026

"We want to abolish capitalism and save the Palestinians from the racist Jews... but we swear we're not leftoid Marxists"

😁15🤣11

26 Aug 2026, 18:30 UTC743 views24 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

British natsoc larp attracting pure dysgenic types these days 😂💩

💔16💯5😁3

26 Aug 2026, 17:23 UTC741 views11 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

▶️ Stream 4PM ET / 10PM CET N8 and Fight Sport join to discuss the deranged villain Syrian Terrorist Girl aka Maram Susli. We will dive into her pathetic politics as an e-girl grifter, her ties to Russia, Iran and Hezbollah and her demonic hypocrisies. YOUTUBE 📺 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ikZW-UsH67A RUMBLE 📺 https://rumble.com/v7eose2-martinez-politics-aug-26-2026-syrian-girl-is-pure-evil.html Superchats …

❤10👍1

26 Aug 2026, 14:42 UTC681 views8 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

👍5🤮2❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 132 posts we hold for @martinezpolitix. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Thuletide
@thuletide · 22,703
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 20 September 2026
Паучительные истории
@paustories · 21,511
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 24 September 2026
Invictus Portucale 🇵🇹
@invictus_portucale · 28,463
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 9 September 2026
Roberto Vaquero
@RobertoVaqueroTelegram · 21,059
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 25 September 2026
POLICE FITNESS
@policefitness · 22,324
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 21 September 2026
Herqles
@herQles · 48,100
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 26 August 2026
🧱LAS GANGAS DE ANDREA🏠
@lasgangasdeandrea · 24,401
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 16 September 2026
DESOKUPA OFICIAL
@desokupaOficial · 47,139
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Martinez Politics” (@martinezpolitix), 8,499 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/martinezpolitix.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.