Channel
@solarireport
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
15,399subscribers
-18 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001404184663 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @solarireport |
| Created | 22 February 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/solarireport |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 20:20 | 15,399 | -14 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 18:39 | 15,413 | -5 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 03:57 | 15,418 | -4 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:59 | 15,422 | -3 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 08:38 | 15,425 | -5 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 04:55 | 15,430 | -7 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 14:37 | 15,437 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:57 | 15,440 | -4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 15,444 | -5 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:28 | 15,449 | -3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:32 | 15,452 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:24 | 15,451 | -8 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:07 | 15,459 | -6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:27 | 15,465 | +14 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:17 | 15,451 | +7 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:55 | 15,444 | +42 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:46 | 15,402 | +11 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 20:16 | 15,391 | +10 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:24 | 15,381 | -15 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 15,396 | first reading |
24 posts held, back to 28 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (28 May 2026 – 31 August 2026) |
| Views total | 8,400 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 10:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
What Happens When Cash Disappears? Cash is easy to take for granted because, for most of us, it is still there when we need it. We can choose to pay with a card, use our phone, or take out a few notes and coins. But if cash disappears, that choice disappears with it. A fully digital payment system means relying on banks, payment networks, electricity, internet connections and the devices that connect us to them. M…
"Protect your independence" Catherine Austin Fitts warns Iceland https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0k7xqgDwdQ
If You Want to Help Yourself with Simple Means, What Is Simpler than Your Own Voice? By Ulrike Granögger When I went to the 2024 Water Conference (which turned out to be the last Water Conference in a magnificent series of events since 2006) to present on the Wave Genome, one of the most memorable speakers was Githa Ben-David from Denmark. She came with her co-worker Merete Vestergaard and the Israeli filmmaker Tsi…
China Cares about the Price of Pork, Not High Stock Prices "2nd Quarter 2026 Wrap Up: Equity Overview & Rambus Chartology with Tim Caban" Financial planner Tim Caban and I present the Equity Overview & Rambus Chartology for the 2nd Quarter 2026 Wrap Up. We start by posing a strategic question: “Which is more important to you—the current value of your assets, or whether those assets will continue to be yours?” Th…
Microsoft Supported the Genocide in Gaza and Is Part of the Laboratory Prototyping Digital Weaponry "Caligula is Blushing" Solari Report Money & Markets: July 2, 2026 with Catherine Austin Fitts & John Titus Full Report: https://solari.com/money-markets-report-july-2-2026/ Subscribe to http://shop.solari.com
It’s a Risky Environment for People Heavily Overinvested in Equities "Understanding Inflation: What’s Next? with Carlos Alegría and Ed Dowd" By Catherine Austin Fitts What is inflation? There are different definitions and the term is used differently—ranging from describing monetary inflation to the increase in the cost of goods. What causes inflation? How do we measure it? What do the available data say about th…
AI Could Devour 40% of America’s Power by 2030—See Where and Why in This Report https://solarireport.substack.com/p/ai-could-devour-40-of-americas-power
Farewell To A Friend, Ally, War Buddy, And Protector: Jon Rappoport https://celiafarber.substack.com/p/farewell-to-a-friend-ally-war-buddy
The Solari Report pinned a photo
📢 A Special 4th of July Offer from the Solari Report Join Solari now to access unique subscriber-only content and in-person events All subscriptions include: - Access to the complete Solari Report audio and video archive - Access to Solari Report transcripts and Quarterly / Annual Wrap Up web presentations - The opportunity to send your questions to Ask Catherine & the Solari Team (a weekly feature) - Access to sp…
We Have Had a Negative-Return-on-Investment Economy for 30 Years "Lunacy Threatens 401(k) and Index Fund Regulation with Tiffany Cianci" The digital control grid has an unending appetite for your capital. Building the systems that enable surveillance, biometric digital IDs, and programmable money—and the data centers and AI that hold and process the data needed to make these systems go—takes trillions of dollars. E…
Stand Up Against What’s Coming—Things Are Not Hopeless Mr. Global in Your Street: Local Politics and Money Are the Last Line of Defense with Elze van Hamelen Daunted by the scale of corruption, the opaqueness of state bureaucracies, the immobility and unresponsiveness of democratic systems, and the lack of fairness, truth, and justice in government operations, many in the freedom movement have understandably but un…
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @solarireport. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Solari Report” (@solarireport), 15,399 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/solarireport.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.