Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for David Icke Official Telegram

Channel

David Icke Official Telegram

@davidickeofficial

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

42,306subscribers

-910 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001525304661
TypeChannel
Username@davidickeofficial
DescriptionOfficial Telegram of ground breaking Author & Public Speaker, David Icke. For Bookshop & Weekly Videocasts - http://www.davidicke.com/
Created19 August 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/davidickeofficial

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

42,30643,21642,7616 August 2026 — 43,216 subscribers6 August 2026 — 43,216 subscribers7 August 2026 — 43,212 subscribers8 August 2026 — 43,208 subscribers9 August 2026 — 43,205 subscribers11 August 2026 — 43,192 subscribers12 August 2026 — 43,174 subscribers13 August 2026 — 43,166 subscribers14 August 2026 — 43,153 subscribers16 August 2026 — 43,139 subscribers17 August 2026 — 43,116 subscribers18 August 2026 — 43,114 subscribers19 August 2026 — 43,112 subscribers20 August 2026 — 43,092 subscribers21 August 2026 — 43,086 subscribers23 August 2026 — 43,066 subscribers24 August 2026 — 43,046 subscribers26 August 2026 — 43,034 subscribers27 August 2026 — 43,024 subscribers28 August 2026 — 43,006 subscribers29 August 2026 — 43,000 subscribers30 August 2026 — 42,998 subscribers31 August 2026 — 42,989 subscribers1 September 2026 — 42,975 subscribers2 September 2026 — 42,961 subscribers3 September 2026 — 42,946 subscribers5 September 2026 — 42,941 subscribers8 September 2026 — 42,893 subscribers11 September 2026 — 42,870 subscribers13 September 2026 — 42,857 subscribers14 September 2026 — 42,850 subscribers16 September 2026 — 42,820 subscribers19 September 2026 — 42,795 subscribers25 September 2026 — 42,746 subscribers4 October 2026 — 42,626 subscribers8 October 2026 — 42,581 subscribers12 October 2026 — 42,543 subscribers14 October 2026 — 42,535 subscribers15 October 2026 — 42,523 subscribers16 October 2026 — 42,512 subscribers17 October 2026 — 42,503 subscribers18 October 2026 — 42,493 subscribers19 October 2026 — 42,487 subscribers20 October 2026 — 42,477 subscribers21 October 2026 — 42,464 subscribers22 October 2026 — 42,454 subscribers23 October 2026 — 42,440 subscribers24 October 2026 — 42,419 subscribers25 October 2026 — 42,408 subscribers26 October 2026 — 42,398 subscribers27 October 2026 — 42,384 subscribers28 October 2026 — 42,372 subscribers29 October 2026 — 42,364 subscribers31 October 2026 — 42,358 subscribers1 November 2026 — 42,344 subscribers2 November 2026 — 42,335 subscribers3 November 2026 — 42,319 subscribers4 November 2026 — 42,315 subscribers5 November 2026 — 42,311 subscribers6 November 2026 — 42,306 subscribers6 August 20266 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 92 days, net -910. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 42,170–43,353 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 09:4742,306-5
5 Nov 2026, 11:2742,311-4
4 Nov 2026, 14:4442,315-4
3 Nov 2026, 16:1642,319-16
2 Nov 2026, 17:3142,335-9
1 Nov 2026, 14:3742,344-14
31 Oct 2026, 13:0642,358-6
29 Oct 2026, 17:3942,364-8
28 Oct 2026, 17:4842,372-12
27 Oct 2026, 19:4142,384-14
26 Oct 2026, 18:1742,398-10
25 Oct 2026, 16:2042,408-11
24 Oct 2026, 16:1642,419-21
23 Oct 2026, 17:5742,440-14
22 Oct 2026, 19:2142,454-10
21 Oct 2026, 14:1642,464-13
20 Oct 2026, 13:4642,477-10
19 Oct 2026, 12:3942,487-6
18 Oct 2026, 12:0542,493-10
17 Oct 2026, 14:5142,503first reading

Engagement

41 posts held, back to 28 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 178 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.9%
avg views ÷ 42,306 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,100
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.91%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 41 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held41 (28 April 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total70,880
Reactions total1,353
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 20:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈120
Videos
≈852
Links
≈20,600

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
55m 23s
Average length
1m 41s

Measured directly from 33 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

10,148 reactions across 41 posts, in 48 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3,40633.6%
❤2,82327.8%
💯2,06620.4%
🔥3473.42%
👏3433.38%
🤡2462.42%
🤮930.916%
💔880.867%
🤔850.838%
🙏800.788%
😁600.591%
👌530.522%
😱420.414%
😈340.335%
🤬340.335%
❤‍🔥330.325%
🕊300.296%
🏆280.276%
🥰280.276%
🍾270.266%
28 further kinds2021.99%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,148 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 28 April 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 7 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

3 Nov 2026, 08:06 UTC≈6,360 views217 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Conform? Get the carrot. Refuse to conform? Stick.

💯108❤46👍42👏11🕊3❤‍🔥2🙏2🔥1

26 Oct 2026, 08:54 UTC≈11,200 views144 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

On this month’s episode of The Dot Connector, David starts the show with an emotive and powerful message in response to the civil unrest happening in different parts of Europe, especially the mass rioting and vandalism occurring in France. Who/what does it actually benefit long-term? As more migrants from one culture integrate into the West, whose culture do they plan on accepting? News headlines covered include ‘The…

❤64💯35👍31🔥7👏6😍1

23 Oct 2026, 11:27 UTC≈9,710 views182 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

On this month's episode of The Dot Connector, David starts the show with an emotive and powerful message in response to the civil unrest happening in different parts of Europe, especially the mass rioting and vandalism occurring in France. Who/what does it actually benefit long-term? As more migrants from one culture integrate into the West, whose culture do they plan on accepting? News headlines covered include 'The…

👍99❤42💯18🔥15👌3👏2⚡1✍1

22 Oct 2026, 15:41 UTC≈8,530 views183 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

For centuries we have been told the apocalypse means the end of the world. But take the word back to its original meaning and it says something very different: the unveiling, the revealing. In this lecture from the 1990s, David argues we are living inside that apocalypse right now - a time when magnetic change is bringing everything that has remained hidden to the surface, including the truth about the extraterrestri…

👍96❤56💯20🙏4🔥3⚡2🤮1😍1

21 Oct 2026, 11:28 UTC≈8,680 views167 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍97💯30❤20🤔9👏3🔥3😱2✍1

14 Oct 2026, 08:48 UTC≈12,700 views150 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

On this ninth instalment of Chin-Wag, David and Jaymie start the show with a brief recollection of the court hearing update regarding David's ban from multiple countries. The duo continue the conversation with an uncomfortable truth occurring not only in the UK but also in many other countries: the rise of babies in care proceedings, which is leading to more unnecessary adoptions. Where exactly do these children end …

👍83❤38💯19🔥8👌2

12 Oct 2026, 11:25 UTC≈13,700 views310 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Yep, just imagine.

💯171🔥46👍40❤20🤮9🤔7😁7🤬4

7 Oct 2026, 09:32 UTC≈15,100 views227 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

What if the moon isn’t all it seems?

👍127❤45💯31🤔14🙏4🌚3🤣2😍1

5 Oct 2026, 14:58 UTC≈13,400 views227 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

During last Friday’s Dot connector, David takes a moment to deliver a timely message about the looming global energy crisis, which is sure to have (the planned) disastrous effect on Western livelihoods. He reminds us to take a step back from all the present fearmongering to remember the (also planned) future outcome – these are not random events, nor should they be treated as such.

💯130❤51👍32🙏9❤‍🔥4✍1

2 Oct 2026, 11:21 UTC≈15,000 views234 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Where is home?

❤153👍42💯26❤‍🔥7🏆5👏1

1 Oct 2026, 10:32 UTC≈13,300 views278 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

It was true back then, it’s simply undeniable now.

👍131💯84❤35👏13💊4🙏4🤔3✍1

30 Sept 2026, 21:59 UTC≈12,200 views602 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Taking a (brief) respite from the madness - having a beer on the North Yorkshire Moors Railway.

❤387👍86👏50🍾27👌11🫡10🏆9💯8

Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @davidickeofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

LauraAboli
@LauraAbolichannel · 165,455
#1
David Avocado Wolfe
@davidavocadowolfe · 101,587
#2
The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@VigilantFox · 118,816
#3
Gareth Icke Tonight
@garethicke · 6,895
#4
Dr David Martin
@DrDavidMartin · 49,805
#5
The Awakened Species ☀️
@awakenedspecies · 140,093
#6
Health Ranger
@RealHealthRanger · 62,515
#7
Stew Peters ✝️🇺🇸
@stewpeters · 132,793
#8
Children’s Health Defense
@childrenshd · 52,477
#9
Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel
@DrMikeYeadonsolochannel · 25,917
#10
Alex Jones
@AlexJonesChannel · 27,431
#11
The Exposé News (Official)
@dailyexpose · 27,519
#12
Gateway Pundit
@gatewaypunditofficial · 108,321
#13
Cruel History
@cruel_historyy · 103,084
#14
Geopolitics Prime
@geopolitics_prime · 289,123
#15
G3 News
@g3news · 6,060
#16
HISTORY
@secret_history2 · 68,615
#17
Dr. Tenpenny
@DrTenpenny · 87,635
#18
The Crowhouse
@thecrowhouseoffical · 29,237
#19
The Last American Vagabond
@TLAVagabond · 4,458
#20
World Doctors Alliance
@worlddoctorsalliance · 74,878
#21
INFOWARS.COM 🚫🚫🚫
@infowarslive · 22,222
#22
𝚁𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚁𝚊𝚋𝚋𝚒𝚝 𝙷𝚘𝚕𝚎𝚜
@Revelations_and_Rabbit_Holes · 24,572
#23
BIG PICTURE | WW3.Film.com with James Patrick (Planet Lockdown)
@PlanetLockdown · 4,339
#24
Paul Joseph Watson
@pjwnews · 37,240
#25
REVEALED EYE
@RevealedEye · 30,159
#26
Conspiracy Theory
@conspiracy_theory3 · 48,477
#27
Edward Dowd
@EdwardDowdReal · 5,218
#28
Disclosure HUB
@disclosurehub · 73,080
#29
Robin Monotti
@robinmg · 66,964
#30
Tucker Carlson
@TuckerCarlsonNetwork · 203,171
#31
Scott Ritter
@ScottRitter · 85,822
#32
The General
@GeneralMCNews · 142,505
#33
FallCabal Official Channel
@Fall_of_the_Cabal · 81,139
#34
Reiner Fuellmich 🇺🇸/🇬🇧/🇦🇺
@ReinerFuellmichEnglish · 83,409
#35
STRANGER THAN FICTION NEWS
@stfn_news · 61,996
#36
Donald J. Trump
@real_donaldjtrump · 580,086
#37
Zeee Media 🎙
@zeeemedia · 53,700
#38
Noticias Rafapal
@rafapalreal · 115,593
#39
Robert W Malone, MD
@RWMaloneMD · 103,240
#40
Insider Paper
@insiderpaper · 107,904
#41
Before Our Time
@BeforeOurTime · 90,411
#42
Shadow of Ezra
@ShadowofEzra · 144,797
#43
BioClandestine
@bioclandestine · 137,678
#44
Follow The White Rabbit ™ 🐇
@followsthewhiterabbit · 78,907
#45
PROJECT CAMELOT
@projectcamelotKerry · 74,453
#46
Orwellian Dystopia
@OrwellianDystopia · 14,117
#47
Matt Ehret and the Canadian Patriot Press
@CanadianPatriotPress · 5,877
#48
Sergeant News Network 🇺🇸
@SGTnewsNetwork · 109,736
#49
The Epoch Times
@epochtimes · 124,897
#50
Project Veritas
@project_veritas · 200,482
#51
Tartaria & History Channel
@TartariaHistoryChannel · 118,862
#52
Vanessa Beeley
@VanessaBeeley · 21,754
#53
KanekoaTheGreat
@KanekoaTheGreat · 114,334
#54
4D International 🐬🐳🦚🍀💎💚💚💚💚🫶
@Fourdirections3132 · 7,402
#55
Q) The Storm Rider /Official Page
@qthestormrider777 · 152,920
#56
The Solari Report
@solarireport · 15,443
#57
Dr Mike Yeadon
@DrMikeYeadon · 26,881
#58
The Duran
@thedurancom · 51,380
#59
World Council for Health
@wch_org · 34,025
#60
Barbara O'Neill
@BarbaraOneill_official · 109,557
#61
Geopolitics & Empire
@GeopoliticsAndEmpire · 12,494
#62
Eva Karene Bartlett
@EvaKarene_Bartlett · 32,504
#63
Jack Posobiec
@Jack_Posobiec · 114,201
#64
Dr Jane Ruby
@DrJaneRuby · 57,109
#65
Real World News
@RealWorldNewsChannel · 24,854
#66
Global Research
@GlobalResearch_ca · 2,276
#67
Forbidden History
@Forbidden_History_tg · 33,480
#68
Just a Dude 😎
@JustDudeChannel · 62,120
#69
Time of Transition (Bernhard Guenther & Laura Matsue)
@timeoftransition · 10,440
#70
TruNews
@trunewsofficial · 4,281
#71
Eastern Approaches—Alex Thomson
@EastApp · 6,173
#72
Master C. Miller
@MasterCMiller · 26,417
#73
Dr. SHIVA Ayyadurai, MIT PhD (OFFICIAL)
@vashiva · 4,144
#74
We The Media
@WeTheMedia · 139,751
#75
Mel Gibson
@mel_gibsonchannel · 58,455
#76
Foreign Agent Intel
@ForeignAgentIntel · 30,932
#77
Julian Assange
@JulianAssangeWiki · 163,830
#78
Disclose.tv
@disclosetv · 317,208
#79
LA QUINTA COLUMNA TV
@laquintacolumna · 161,530
#80

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

The Crowhouse
@thecrowhouseoffical · 29,237
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 8 September 2026
Reiner Fuellmich 🇺🇸/🇬🇧/🇦🇺
@ReinerFuellmichEnglish · 83,409
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 August 2026
Alex Jones
@AlexJonesChannel · 27,431
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 September 2026
The Exposé News (Official)
@dailyexpose · 27,519
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 September 2026
Dr David Martin
@DrDavidMartin · 49,805
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 August 2026
Christine Anderson, MdEP (AfD)
@christineanderson · 34,980
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 2 September 2026
Stew Peters ✝️🇺🇸
@stewpeters · 132,793
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 13 August 2026
Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel
@DrMikeYeadonsolochannel · 25,917
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026
REALCHRISSKY
@realchrissky · 31,594
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 8 September 2026
Health Ranger
@RealHealthRanger · 62,515
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
Children’s Health Defense
@childrenshd · 52,477
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 24 August 2026
INFOWARS.COM 🚫🚫🚫
@infowarslive · 22,222
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 20 September 2026
FallCabal Official Channel
@Fall_of_the_Cabal · 81,139
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 18 August 2026
Chef Pete Evans
@ChefPeteEvans · 28,361
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 8 September 2026
Dr. Bryan Ardis
@BryanArdis · 36,516
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 1 September 2026
Dr Jane Ruby
@DrJaneRuby · 57,109
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 August 2026
Christiane Northrup M.D
@drchristianenorthrup · 41,017
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 29 August 2026
Dr. Mercola
@DoctorMercola · 30,881
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 5 September 2026
Zeee Media 🎙
@zeeemedia · 53,700
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
Robin Monotti
@robinmg · 66,964
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
Dr Mike Yeadon
@DrMikeYeadon · 26,881
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 September 2026
World Council for Health
@wch_org · 34,025
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 2 September 2026
Candace Owens On Fire🔥
@CandaceOnFire · 28,749
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 7 September 2026
Robert W Malone, MD
@RWMaloneMD · 103,240
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 25 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q333118 on Wikidata, read 1 November 2026
LabelDavid Icke
DescriptionEnglish conspiracy theorist (born 1952)
X / Twitter@davidicke
Official sitehttps://davidicke.com/

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“David Icke Official Telegram” (@davidickeofficial), 42,306 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/davidickeofficial.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.