Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Time of Transition (Bernhard Guenther & Laura Matsue)

Channel

Time of Transition (Bernhard Guenther & Laura Matsue)

@timeoftransition

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,679subscribers

-126 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001299657682
TypeChannel
Username@timeoftransition
Created8 January 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held30
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/timeoftransition

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

10,67910,80510,7426 August 2026 — 10,805 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,805 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,804 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,805 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,799 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,796 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,791 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,787 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,788 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,784 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,779 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,770 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,768 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,761 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,757 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,741 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,730 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,726 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,718 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,716 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,713 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,710 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,709 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,708 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,704 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,701 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,696 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,690 subscribers7 September 2026 — 10,683 subscribers10 September 2026 — 10,679 subscribers6 August 202610 September 2026
30 measurements spanning 35 days, net -126. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,660–10,824 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 06:3810,679-4
7 Sept 2026, 00:1710,683-7
4 Sept 2026, 11:3610,690-6
2 Sept 2026, 21:3810,696-5
1 Sept 2026, 18:0410,701-3
31 Aug 2026, 20:3610,704-4
30 Aug 2026, 22:0510,708-1
29 Aug 2026, 21:2410,709-1
29 Aug 2026, 00:1410,710-3
28 Aug 2026, 00:4710,713-3
26 Aug 2026, 00:3910,716-2
24 Aug 2026, 23:1710,718-8
23 Aug 2026, 12:2910,726-4
21 Aug 2026, 20:1610,730-11
20 Aug 2026, 13:2910,741-16
19 Aug 2026, 13:4810,757-4
18 Aug 2026, 14:1210,761-7
17 Aug 2026, 13:1810,768-2
16 Aug 2026, 06:4510,770-9
14 Aug 2026, 17:1410,779first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.16%
avg views ÷ 10,679 subscribers
Avg views / post
872
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 40 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held40 (15 July 20261 September 2026)
Views total13,949
Reactions total275
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Sept 2026, 20:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 34s
Average length
2m 34s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

784 reactions across 40 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
55670.9%
🔥12616.1%
👍415.23%
🙏415.23%
👏162.04%
😁10.128%
🤔10.128%
🤯10.128%
🥰10.128%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 784 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 13:08 UTC228 views10 reactionsread 1 September 2026

“All authentic spiritual and esoteric traditions, East and West, agree on one thing: sincerity is the foundation of the path. It is the prerequisite for giving yourself to the Divine without conditions. But sincerity is not what most people think it is. Many believe they are sincere while lying to themselves. Real sincerity is radical honesty. It is the willingness to see yourself without spiritual makeup, without p

6🔥3👏1

Signed Angela D

31 Aug 2026, 12:57 UTC508 views11 reactionsread 1 September 2026

“The ​paradox [with Lindsay Clancy] ​is ​the ​good ​mother ​versus ​the ​devouring ​mother. This great mother archetype has never been purely benevolent. ​The ​mother contains opposites; she gives life, she ​takes life, ​she ​nourishes, ​she ​devours, ​she ​creates, ​and ​destroys. In that sense, she also mirrors Mother Nature itself: the earth gives birth, feeds and sustains life, and is also the same earth in whic

8🙏3

Signed Angela D

28 Aug 2026, 20:09 UTC757 views17 reactionsread 1 September 2026

“If you hold a negative view of men or women in general, you will find and attract precisely those kinds of men and women. This is why people who have very low opinions of men/women end up in cycles of toxic relationships that they don't desire. If you hold deep appreciation and love and reverence for the sex you're attracted to, you genuinely appreciate men or women, you feel safe with them, love them, & value them

7🔥5👍3👏1🙏1

Signed Angela D

27 Aug 2026, 12:54 UTC848 views17 reactionsread 1 September 2026

“The core signs of the Fourth Turning are collapsing trust in institutions, extreme polarization, economic instability, the breakdown of our shared reality and narratives, ​and immense psychological strain. It’s the ​death of an old cultural story that’s happening right now. People ​are going through monumental shifts in their personal lives. ​Collectively, ​we are witnessing the peak of public distrust in instituti

6🔥6👍5

Signed Angela D

26 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC836 views21 reactionsread 1 September 2026

“The “truth ​movement” and anarchism oftentimes neurotically reject all authority, ​even to the point of rejecting God. ​I’m not taking myself out of the equation; I can relate to the father wound of an emotionally absent father and ​not really being mentored. Through ​this ​unconscious ​resentment, I ​rejected ​all ​authority. There is truth in needing to question authority. ​I can see this in myself and, by extens

13🔥4👍3😁1

Signed Angela D

25 Aug 2026, 12:59 UTC776 views15 reactionsread 1 September 2026

“Shadow work is not about indulging in the shadow and acting it out, nor is it about repressing or suppressing negative emotions. It has nothing to do with inaction or simply letting external evil run rampant. It is also not about forcing yourself to feel or think positive thoughts and emotions. This only pushes the shadow further underground and gives it more unconscious power. That is the dark side, or limitation,

9👏4🔥2

Signed Angela D

24 Aug 2026, 18:54 UTC779 views14 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

One of the greatest traps in spiritual warfare is becoming what you fight against. Full video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f6Ary0WpreY Extended article: https://veilofreality.com/2026/08/19/shadow-work-and-occult-spiritual-warfare/

🔥64👏3👍1

Signed Bernhard Guenther

21 Aug 2026, 15:14 UTC≈1,090 views11 reactionsread 1 September 2026

I recently had a great conversation with Beth Martens, exploring deeper questions behind the work I’ve been sharing for many years. At a time when so much attention is focused on external events and the challenges unfolding in the world, we kept returning to one central principle: The work begins within. We explored the relationship between our inner world and the larger forces shaping humanity, including: - The

11

Signed Bernhard Guenther

21 Aug 2026, 12:57 UTC976 views12 reactionsread 1 September 2026

“Some ​people fall into a passive form of spirituality. ​They ​believe ​that ​surrender ​to ​divine ​will ​means ​not ​acting, ​not ​committing, ​not ​making ​any ​choices, ​not ​making ​any ​effort, ​and simply letting things happen or going with the flow, as if God will do everything for them. The ​spiritual ​path ​does ​not ​ask ​us ​to ​become ​passive ​bystanders ​who ​merely ​observe ​everything. But forced ​p

7🔥5

Signed Angela D

20 Aug 2026, 13:14 UTC871 views12 reactionsread 1 September 2026

“Individuation ​begins ​with ​a ​deconditioning ​process. ​What ​are ​the ​ancestral ​patterns, ​the ​patterns ​you ​picked ​up ​in ​your ​family ​of ​origin, which ​are ​not ​in ​alignment ​with ​your ​True ​Self? It’s about releasing the conditioning patterns that get in the way of expressing your authenticity and keeping what serves you. The ​deconditioning ​process is ​also ​a ​sorting ​process. ​You’re ​not ​j

12

Signed Angela D

19 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC867 views25 reactionsread 1 September 2026

“When doing inner work, one of the most important things is to see yourself as you actually are. To have the capacity to be with your difficult emotions without identifying with them, without being overwhelmed by them or running away from them, and to allow yourself to feel them. You have to be able to sit with grief, sadness, shame, and anger, and not project them onto others you might judge as “asleep” or “caught

21🔥4

Signed Angela D

19 Aug 2026, 01:33 UTC792 views12 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

My latest article goes deeper into the occult law of rebound, psychic attack, the externalization of evil, wetiko, inner differentiation, spiritual narcissism, and why genuine shadow work is one of the most important forms of psychic and spiritual protection and one of the primary means to mitigate and dissolve evil in the world. I also explore why shadow work is not about passivity, repression, or simply assuming t

12

Signed Bernhard Guenther

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @timeoftransition. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

David Icke Official Telegram
@davidickeofficial · 42,870
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Time of Transition (Bernhard Guenther & Laura Matsue)” (@timeoftransition), 10,679 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/timeoftransition.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.