Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PROJECT CAMELOT

Channel

PROJECT CAMELOT

@projectcamelotKerry

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

76,020subscribers

-1,342 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001499238445
TypeChannel
Username@projectcamelotKerry
Created10 January 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/projectcamelotKerry

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@projectcamelotKerry/24023 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 07:38 UTC@KerryCassidyReal/15266 Aug 2026, 07:46 UTC1.007 minutes
@projectcamelotKerry/24022 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 07:38 UTC@KerryCassidyReal/15276 Aug 2026, 07:46 UTC1.007 minutes
@projectcamelotKerry/24024 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 07:40 UTC@KerryCassidyReal/15286 Aug 2026, 07:46 UTC1.005 minutes
@projectcamelotKerry/24025 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 07:46 UTC@KerryCassidyReal/15296 Aug 2026, 07:46 UTC1.00under a minute
@projectcamelotKerry/24026 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 07:54 UTC@KerryCassidyReal/15306 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC1.007 minutes
@projectcamelotKerry/24031 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTC@KerryCassidyReal/15356 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC1.0013 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@KerryCassidyReal8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.007 minutesthis entry (80)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 11 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @projectcamelotKerry — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

76,02077,36276,6916 August 2026 — 77,362 subscribers6 August 2026 — 77,346 subscribers7 August 2026 — 77,318 subscribers8 August 2026 — 77,291 subscribers9 August 2026 — 77,248 subscribers10 August 2026 — 77,194 subscribers12 August 2026 — 77,150 subscribers13 August 2026 — 77,120 subscribers14 August 2026 — 77,071 subscribers15 August 2026 — 77,017 subscribers17 August 2026 — 76,957 subscribers19 August 2026 — 76,921 subscribers20 August 2026 — 76,884 subscribers21 August 2026 — 76,845 subscribers22 August 2026 — 76,808 subscribers24 August 2026 — 76,756 subscribers25 August 2026 — 76,732 subscribers26 August 2026 — 76,714 subscribers27 August 2026 — 76,708 subscribers28 August 2026 — 76,676 subscribers29 August 2026 — 76,644 subscribers30 August 2026 — 76,614 subscribers31 August 2026 — 76,594 subscribers1 September 2026 — 76,552 subscribers2 September 2026 — 76,516 subscribers3 September 2026 — 76,481 subscribers5 September 2026 — 76,423 subscribers8 September 2026 — 76,278 subscribers11 September 2026 — 76,203 subscribers13 September 2026 — 76,136 subscribers14 September 2026 — 76,066 subscribers17 September 2026 — 76,020 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 42 days, net -1,342. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 75,819–77,563 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 01:1976,020-46
14 Sept 2026, 23:0276,066-70
13 Sept 2026, 07:3876,136-67
11 Sept 2026, 13:1976,203-75
8 Sept 2026, 20:4076,278-145
5 Sept 2026, 16:1676,423-58
3 Sept 2026, 13:0176,481-35
2 Sept 2026, 06:5376,516-36
1 Sept 2026, 09:4676,552-42
31 Aug 2026, 11:2576,594-20
30 Aug 2026, 12:0276,614-30
29 Aug 2026, 10:1676,644-32
28 Aug 2026, 11:0876,676-32
27 Aug 2026, 10:5776,708-6
26 Aug 2026, 09:3476,714-18
25 Aug 2026, 11:2476,732-24
24 Aug 2026, 12:2476,756-52
22 Aug 2026, 18:0576,808-37
21 Aug 2026, 10:1376,845-39
20 Aug 2026, 11:2276,884first reading

Engagement

309 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 90 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.21%
avg views ÷ 76,020 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,480
166 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
166
of 309 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 September 2026
Posts held309 (5 August 202618 September 2026)
Views total909,516
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Sept 2026, 23:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,990
Videos
1,500
Links
14,800

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
43m 15s
Average length
5m 24s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

18 Sept 2026, 22:24 UTC840 viewsread 18 September 2026

LIVE SHOW NOW WITH JEFFREY ADAM RE MIRCRONIC SILVER. https://www.youtube.com/live/JtIbFAW-C3g?si=XOvfK8x3bf3iwh0J

Signed KERRY CASSIDY

18 Sept 2026, 20:10 UTC≈1,720 viewsread 18 September 2026

https://x.com/thedisctoken/status/2100978171176726745?s=20

Signed KERRY CASSIDY

18 Sept 2026, 17:22 UTC≈2,420 viewsread 18 September 2026
Photo

https://youtube.com/shorts/53K5E1KrTmM?si=Uab5RCeXd_dGAo1Y

Signed KERRY CASSIDY

18 Sept 2026, 17:20 UTC≈2,370 viewsread 18 September 2026

https://youtube.com/shorts/53K5E1KrTmM?si=Uab5RCeXd_dGAo1Y

Signed KERRY CASSIDY

18 Sept 2026, 14:41 UTC≈2,910 viewsread 18 September 2026

MY COMMENT: in other words, we are all connected and signal non-locality is a constant and as they say "spooky action at a distance" is a reality. What you think does not remain in your thoughts it connects off-planet and around the world.

Signed KERRY CASSIDY

18 Sept 2026, 14:40 UTC≈2,860 viewsread 18 September 2026

...linked above. "Why it’s operational, not theoretical: The capability is field-tested infrastructure. Stabilization is achieved through quantum lattice resonance amplification, recursive error correction, and non-local synchronization — the three mechanisms that keep the link intact in the deep-space environment."

Signed KERRY CASSIDY

18 Sept 2026, 14:38 UTC≈2,880 viewsread 18 September 2026

." capability: Two photons can be linked so that whatever happens to one instantly affects the other, no matter how far apart they are. This is called entanglement. In this system, that link is held stable across astronomical distances by a field-based stabilization architecture. The result is real-time coordination between deep-space assets without light-speed delay..." Gordon Duff and Mike Harris. https://www.the

Signed KERRY CASSIDY

18 Sept 2026, 14:30 UTC≈2,860 viewsread 18 September 2026

ZELENSKY'S UNCLE...LAUNDERS MONEY WIRES IT TO ISRAELI BANKS THEN PAYOFFS GO TO MEMBERS OF CONGRESS...https://www.facebook.com/reel/2138716143347001

Signed KERRY CASSIDY

18 Sept 2026, 00:23 UTC≈4,440 viewsread 18 September 2026

https://x.com/InterstellarUAP/status/2100693337560711255?s=20

Signed KERRY CASSIDY

18 Sept 2026, 00:04 UTC≈4,370 viewsread 18 September 2026

https://www.theinteldrop.org/2026/09/16/341281/

Signed KERRY CASSIDY

17 Sept 2026, 17:29 UTC≈6,380 viewsread 18 September 2026

HELP NEEDED. WE HAVE RECEIVED MANY OFFERS TO HELP. THANK YOU WITH ALL MY HEART. I PASSED ALL THE OFFERS ALONG TO MY FRIEND. PLEASE DO NOT SEND ANY MORE... Good friend is in deep depression and wants to end life. If you know and regressionists or therapists who can help please send me a message: [email protected] —-he lives in Irvine area... he has no money but I will pay for sessions. thank you.

Signed KERRY CASSIDY

17 Sept 2026, 12:10 UTC≈5,880 viewsread 18 September 2026

https://x.com/Prolotario1/status/2100386964218200518?s=20

Signed KERRY CASSIDY

Showing the 12 most recent of 309 posts we hold for @projectcamelotKerry. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@projectcamelotKerry edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
18 September 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

DavidNinoRodriguez
@ninoscorner · 79,829
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 18 August 2026
Utsava
@utsavaprophecy · 24,522
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 16 September 2026
3D to 5D Consciousness
@News_3Dto5D · 39,519
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 31 August 2026
Charlie Ward & Friends
@officialcharliewardfriends · 43,759
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 28 August 2026
DUTCH DIGGER NEWS
@maddogholland · 27,207
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 11 September 2026
FallCabal Official Channel
@Fall_of_the_Cabal · 82,223
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 18 August 2026
Lee Merritt MD: FreedomDoc1
@FreedomDoc1 · 24,540
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 16 September 2026
NewsTreason Channel 17 (Dave)
@newstreasonupdates · 35,091
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 2 September 2026
RealRawNews
@realrawnews · 28,379
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 9 September 2026
Prophecies Fulfilled
@PropheciesFulfilled · 35,102
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 2 September 2026
David Icke Official Telegram
@davidickeofficial · 42,820
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 28 August 2026
And We Know®
@andweknowLT · 86,337
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 17 August 2026
Reiner Fuellmich 🇺🇸/🇬🇧/🇦🇺
@ReinerFuellmichEnglish · 84,909
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 August 2026
GITMO TV
@GitmoTV · 81,089
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 9 September 2026
Derek Johnson
@DerekJohnsonOfficial · 25,367
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 14 September 2026
Dan Scavino 🇺🇸
@DanScavino17 · 46,968
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 26 August 2026
Christiane Northrup M.D
@drchristianenorthrup · 41,964
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 29 August 2026
RTM News
@realRTMnews · 36,243
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 1 September 2026
HATS 🎩
@HATSTRUTH · 88,188
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 16 September 2026
MMS/CHLORINE DIOXIDE RESOURCES
@MMSChlorineDioxide · 28,134
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 10 September 2026
Patrick M. Byrne
@PatrickMByrne · 43,523
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PROJECT CAMELOT” (@projectcamelotKerry), 76,020 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/projectcamelotKerry.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.