Photo, posted without a caption

Channel
JUAN O SAVIN 107 ®
@JUANOSAVIN107
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,849subscribers
+561 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001326554793 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @JUANOSAVIN107 |
| Description | JUAN O SAVIN 107 Official Channel DMCA COPYRIGHT Please Subscribe. Authorized by Juan to post in his name. RUMBLE https://rumble.com/c/JUANOSAVINPRESENTATIONS On X. https://x.com/JuanOSavin107 Telegram https://t.me/JUANOSAVIN107 Exclusive DMCA content. |
| Created | 10 January 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/JUANOSAVIN107 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 03:07 | 9,849 | +43 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 05:47 | 9,806 | +8 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 08:20 | 9,798 | +2 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 22:49 | 9,796 | +5 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 12:06 | 9,791 | +7 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 10:09 | 9,784 | -3 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 23:56 | 9,787 | +20 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 13:31 | 9,767 | -1 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 08:18 | 9,768 | +84 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 07:55 | 9,684 | +121 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 03:57 | 9,563 | +9 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 22:38 | 9,554 | +27 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 18:36 | 9,527 | +24 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 15:18 | 9,503 | +32 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:59 | 9,471 | +47 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 08:53 | 9,424 | +42 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:23 | 9,382 | +13 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 9,369 | +6 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 19:52 | 9,363 | +10 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 09:04 | 9,353 | first reading |
Engagement
224 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 42 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 36.7%
- avg views ÷ 9,849 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,620
- 43 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 43
- of 224 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 224 (4 August 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 155,474 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 09:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,960
- Videos
- ≈890
- Links
- ≈4,950
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 40m 34s
- Average length
- 2m 42s
Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 43 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
https://x.com/YOOTAKSON/status/2118938986429255959?a=PKuxmoSxFMxvcQYkXyQ&s=20
Pete Hegseth answers only to The Commander-in-Chief “Who is the Commander and Chief of the military? Under what article can the President impose MI take over investigations for the 3 letter agencies? What conditions must present itself? Why is this so VERY important? Who surrounds POTUS? They lost this very important power _ the one area of the govt not corrupt and directly serves POTUS.”
https://joehoft.com/exclusive-new-hope-brunson-case-loy-brunson-aims/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=exclusive-new-hope-brunson-case-loy-brunson-aims
https://x.com/holonabove/status/2118476698597417220?a=UePETDGLx-I3jXGCplY&s=19
https://x.com/TheJusticeDept/status/2118387344944308552?a=0Yic0c9mo7otHNleAPk&s=19
Photo, posted without a caption
The basis for Voter Fraud is tied directly to cash balances and Counties without records (audits) and suspiciously aligned dates. In 2018 Jon Tester running for third term Senate took Gallatin and Missoula Counties over the TOP for Tester. And coincidentally 2026 same thing District one race swung Democrat. Money coming into Counties to fraud the vote? Honest Money means LOCAL to defeat the fraud. Via NO KINGS dire…
https://x.com/eagameover/status/2118024986573336742?a=PBvSSDES6FRdL7quJPo&s=19
https://x.com/GeneralJoeM17/status/2117949983013917060?a=0yaD9MCbTgo0_cV7G68&s=19
Photo, posted without a caption
C’mon… “17” seats flipped? White Hats in Control. Breathe!!! -Deep Dives
Showing the 12 most recent of 224 posts we hold for @JUANOSAVIN107. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @JUANOSAVIN107 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 4 November 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 4 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 17 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 1
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@projectcamelotKerry · 74,45314 postsGirl with a Fishbowl
@Girlwithafishbowl · 945 postsRon Starr ⭐
@Ronald_Starr · 6,4714 postsTRUTH & INSPIRATION 🎯🌤NEWS
@TRUTHINSPIRATION · 3,7743 postsGiaSTORM17
@giastorm17 · 1003 postsSunshine Today🌻
@andreaporlaluz · 182 postsDie Badische Schildmaid
@BadischeSchildmaid · 3761 post🇺🇸CPN🇺🇸 HQ’s 💥🎙️💥
@CPNHQs · 5311 postData FLQQD Disclosure✨Justice Is Here
@DDDJusticeIsHere · 461 postDigital Soldier Back Channel 🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨
@DigitalSoldierBackChannel · 8,1931 postExpanding Reality1
@ExpandingReality1 · 861 postGESARA Show Intel ️Channel
@GESARA_Show_Intel · 15,8761 postICONS(INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY OF NATURAL SOVEREIGNS)
@ICONS2021 · 24,1821 postMAINEGIRL1 NOT GOING TO DM AND NOT ON FB
@MAINEGIR · 7,4841 postMajFreddy’s Channel
@MajorFreddysChannel · 19,0731 postMeme💊Pilled
@Meme_Pilled · 2,9481 postThe Sovereign Redneck Renegade - Christos Guardian Alliance
@SRR_888_CGA · 32,7731 postStella Justintime
@TheShieldmaiden · 2,0891 post📺 Truth Seekers - Channel
@TheTruthSeekersChannel · 13,4141 post4TruthnJustice
@TruthnJustice4All2GodbeTheGlory · 281 postAmericans for Justice, Inc
@a4justice · 2311 postBilly Oliver
@bcojr · 3631 postBijeli Tihi Marš - VIJESTI
@bijeli_tihi_mars · 1491 postKekistan 👻
@hazydays5150 · 2,6691 postPATRIOT 17 ⚜️
@lightnerpatriot17 · 35,3171 postmanoftruth
@manoftruthofficial · 1,6451 postMaRaKiMU, QC (Official)
@marakimuqcofficial · 161 postPatriots Supporting Patriots 2🇺🇸
@patriotssupportingpatriots2 · 681 postQ DECODES GET READY!
@rrm_mcafee_decodes · 7401 postSpyBalloon 🎈
@spyballoonchat · 1,2191 post♥️ The Lightworkers Institute ♥️
@thelightworkersinstitute · 9991 postWeisser Hase
@weisserhaselinks · 201 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@candlesinthenight · 92,2357 postsQ DECODES GET READY!
@rrm_mcafee_decodes · 7405 postsClandestine
@WarClandestine · 1,7524 postsil Donaldo Trumpo
@RealDonaldoTrumpo · 154,4083 postsDEEP DIVES
@DeepDives · 32,2762 posts🎶 W.H.Grampa🎸
@WHGrampaChannel · 45,5632 postsInsider Paper
@insiderpaper · 107,9042 postsJohn McAfee
@johnmcafeechannel · 32,4282 postsDavidNinoRodriguez
@ninoscorner · 78,4342 postsDonald J. Trump
@real_donaldjtrump · 579,9582 postsCaptain Keshel and Co. American Election Integrity HQ
@ElectionHQ2024 · 67,7271 postThe General
@GeneralMCNews · 142,5051 postSantaSurfing
@SantaSurfing · 121,4721 postThe Prisoner's Record
@ThePrisonersRecord · 8,7311 postBioClandestine
@bioclandestine · 137,6781 postDisclose.tv
@disclosetv · 317,0881 postMidnight Rider Channel 🇺🇸
@realKarliBonne · 180,0331 postThe QNewsPatriot (Official)
@realqnewspatriot · 22,3121 postDavid Clements
@theprofessorsrecord · 49,7341 postTina Peters
@therealtinapeters · 2,1051 postWAR CORRESPONDENT
@warcorrespondent107 · 15,0341 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@WarClandestine · 1,7524 postsDEEP DIVES
@DeepDives · 32,2762 postsInsider Paper
@insiderpaper · 107,9042 postsJohn McAfee
@johnmcafeechannel · 32,4282 posts🎶 W.H.Grampa🎸
@WHGrampaChannel · 45,5632 postsDataRepublican (small r)
@DataRepublican · 11,7761 postDisclose.tv
@disclosetv · 317,0881 postThe General
@GeneralMCNews · 142,5051 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@JUANOSAVIN107 named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 12 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 12 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@DerekJohnsonOfficial · 24,465
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 14 September 2026
@ninoscorner · 78,434
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“JUAN O SAVIN 107 ®” (@JUANOSAVIN107), 9,849 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JUANOSAVIN107.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.