Channel
@HATSTRUTH
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
86,878subscribers
-3,143 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001473868914 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @HATSTRUTH |
| Created | 30 March 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 49 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/HATSTRUTH |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Oct 2026, 04:48 | 86,878 | -27 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 03:47 | 86,905 | -30 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 03:57 | 86,935 | -20 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 05:19 | 86,955 | -48 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 20:36 | 87,003 | -28 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 20:40 | 87,031 | -50 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 18:28 | 87,081 | -26 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 19:47 | 87,107 | -33 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 17:41 | 87,140 | -43 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 14:10 | 87,183 | -36 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 14:40 | 87,219 | -48 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 06:07 | 87,267 | -133 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 02:40 | 87,400 | -137 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 13:18 | 87,537 | -312 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 06:36 | 87,849 | -229 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 08:42 | 88,078 | -110 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 00:59 | 88,188 | -54 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 23:36 | 88,242 | -76 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 06:58 | 88,318 | -102 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 11:20 | 88,420 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 25 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 162 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6,293 reactions across 22 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 1,884 | 29.9% | |
| 🤬 | 1,139 | 18.1% | |
| 👏 | 549 | 8.72% | |
| ❤ | 536 | 8.52% | |
| 👍 | 403 | 6.40% | |
| 🤔 | 348 | 5.53% | |
| 😁 | 309 | 4.91% | |
| 💩 | 240 | 3.81% | |
| 🙏 | 231 | 3.67% | |
| 🤯 | 209 | 3.32% | |
| 👎 | 105 | 1.67% | |
| 🤡 | 77 | 1.22% | |
| 😢 | 66 | 1.05% | |
| 😱 | 48 | 0.763% | |
| 🕊 | 43 | 0.683% | |
| 🖕 | 35 | 0.556% | |
| 🥰 | 22 | 0.35% | |
| 😨 | 17 | 0.27% | |
| 🤩 | 17 | 0.27% | |
| 🎉 | 10 | 0.159% | |
| 1 further kind | 5 | 0.079% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,293 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 25 May 2026 to 12 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
"The plan of the Great Reset is that you will die with nothing." Australian senator, Malcolm Roberts, dropping serious truth bombs about the WEF—and its dystopian Great Reset agenda—in the Australian parliament. Subscribe to @HATSTRUTH 🎩
🔥189👍72👏37❤32🤬22🙏11😁6🤔5
9-11-01 CNN Reporter Jamie McIntyre Says He Saw No Airplane Wreckage At The Pentagon @HATSTRUTH 🎩
🔥143👍66❤24🤯7🙏6👏5😨4
Video, posted without a caption
🤬263😢61🔥22🙏16🖕13🤯9❤8🤔3
😂
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
🙏113💩80😁68🔥29🥰10🤯8🤩6🕊5
Cameras are going up everywhere for mass surveillance not public safety. They are linked to the new Al data centres. The 'elites' know when the masses 'wake up' they are going to need these control systems Your taxes are paying for this. You are paying for your own subjugation. ~ Andrew Bridgen Subscribe to @HATSTRUTH 🎩
🤬257🔥87🤯38❤26🤡13🕊6🤔4😁3
The nuclear farce of Hiroshima and Nagasaki Explanation to the historical-military fake of the "Atomic Bomb” and the ”Nuclear Fear" and the blatant inconsistencies about the destructions of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. They did the same thing as in Dresden. All three cities were Christian. Coincidence, of course not. Fire bombing Subscribe to @HATSTRUTH 🎩
🔥129❤37🤔32🤯16🤡15👏9🤬7👍5
micro dosing baking soda and lathering hydrogen peroxide is all the preventative cancer treatment a person needs on top of brocoli and curcuma, good sleep, a proper diet, plenty of sunshine and EMF shielding... consult holistic sources for more on how to.... Subscribe to @HATSTRUTH 🎩
🔥108❤72👏42🥰12🤯7🕊5💩2😢2
Q, Anon or Qanon PsyOp created by Bannon & Epstein. It was originally called Cicada, and also originally based on Operation Trust. Subscribe to @HATSTRUTH 🎩
💩140🤔70👎50👏48😁21🔥15🤯8😭5
The CIA knew about cancer cures 50 years ago. Subscribe to @HATSTRUTH 🎩
🤬191🔥55👍30❤15😁7🤯5😱5😨2
Cathedrals have fascinated me he first moment i saw one. They are cosmic puzzle pieces and in my opinion one of humanities greatest achievements. Subscribe to @HATSTRUTH 🎩
🔥110👍37❤22🤔21🤯7🕊6😁3🎉2
it never changes, same story Subscribe to @HATSTRUTH 🎩
🤔66🤡27🔥23🕊8❤6👍6🤯6🙏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @HATSTRUTH. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 107 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 118 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“HATS 🎩” (@HATSTRUTH), 86,878 subscribers as measured 25 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HATSTRUTH.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.