Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 44 days, net -2,503. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 168,491–171,744 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 02:57
168,866
-162
16 Sept 2026, 16:21
169,028
-130
14 Sept 2026, 19:58
169,158
-111
13 Sept 2026, 06:39
169,269
-92
11 Sept 2026, 09:56
169,361
-122
8 Sept 2026, 16:40
169,483
-190
5 Sept 2026, 09:57
169,673
+17
3 Sept 2026, 13:22
169,656
-80
2 Sept 2026, 09:53
169,736
-21
1 Sept 2026, 10:14
169,757
-74
31 Aug 2026, 08:57
169,831
-48
30 Aug 2026, 05:52
169,879
-18
29 Aug 2026, 05:44
169,897
-25
28 Aug 2026, 07:34
169,922
-42
27 Aug 2026, 04:08
169,964
-7
26 Aug 2026, 04:18
169,971
-59
25 Aug 2026, 03:27
170,030
-78
23 Aug 2026, 21:47
170,108
-41
22 Aug 2026, 05:28
170,149
-74
20 Aug 2026, 22:38
170,223
first reading
Engagement
1,139 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 103 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.05%
avg views ÷ 168,866 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,520
698 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.64%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
698
of 1,139 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 688 of 698 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026
Posts held
1,139 (5 August 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Views total
5,949,410
Reactions total
216,125
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
25 Sept 2026, 08:33 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈30,100
Videos
≈32,600
Links
≈59,400
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
13h 01m
Average length
1m 42s
Measured directly from 459 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
308,689 reactions across 986 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
56,726
18.4%
🤬
54,329
17.6%
👍
46,241
15.0%
🙏
33,486
10.8%
🤮
29,993
9.72%
🤡
24,418
7.91%
🤔
24,000
7.77%
👏
18,242
5.91%
😢
8,691
2.82%
😱
7,933
2.57%
😍
2,646
0.857%
🤨
1,984
0.643%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 988 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 308,689 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 13 August 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
❗️Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas told the UN on Thursday that Israeli policies were no longer merely undermining the prospects for a two-state solution, but had escalated into a threat to the “very life and existence” of the Palestinian people.
“The danger is no longer limited to undermining the two-state solution and preventing the realization of the Palestinian state. It has now come to threaten the very life…
‘I want to give you the GOOD NEWS — something incredible will happen in Iran’
‘The Iranian people will be FREE’
‘This evil regime will FALL’
Not sure what card he’s hiding ip his sleeve, it can’t be good, but he seems delusional…
Professor Shirin Saedi was labeled ‘antisemitic’ and fired from the University of Arkansas over speaking out against Israel and the bombing of Iran
‘I was the first faculty member to hire a Jewish scholar from Israel’ — Saedi
‘He was also called antisemitic because he was critical of Israel’
Even Israelis are labelled antisemitic!
🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️
'There are some, especially in Western Europe, who’ve chosen NOT to stand up' — Netanyahu
'Leaders of these countries have chosen to succumb to antisemitic mob'
Antisemitic mob aka anyone that dares criticise him or his governmemt, which at this point means the mob is the size of practically the entire world!
‘Iranian tyrants are MOST AFRAID of their own people’ — Netanyahu
Israeli PM holds up a Starlink terminal, saying it gives Iranians access to ‘TRUTH’ and ‘FREEDOM OF SPEECH’
He leaves it for Iran’s delegation ‘when they inevitably DEFECT’
Did he watch Khameini’s funeral? Does he think his own people will mourn him like that? Nobody is defecting in Iran.
‘We've taken innumerable steps to PROTECT the civilian population’ — Netanyahu
‘Is this GENOCIDE? Of course not’
‘It’s the OPPOSITE of genocide’
Does he actually think he’s fooling anyone at this stage?
‘Do you know what just ONE ballistic missile would do if it hit this place?’ — Netanyahu at UN
‘It would obliterate the ENTIRE COMPOUND’
‘Two such missiles would OBLITERATE the UN’
Reminder: Iran does NOT have nuclear weapons. Israel has.
‘Israel is defending many of the countries whose delegates just LEFT this hall’ — Netanyahu
‘Many of their leaders even THANK US privately for taking out Iran’s nukes’
I doubt anyone is thanking Israel for anything…!
'Devastating Iran’s nuclear facilities was HARD, very hard to do' — Netanyahu at UNGA
'But for me, it was one of easiest decision I’ve ever had to make'
'Because if we hadn’t done it, we’d all be DEAD'
😂😂😂
Netanyahu as delegations LEAVE UNGA hall when he begins his speech:
'If there are any other moral COWARDS who haven’t yet left the hall, please do so now'
Israel’s UN envoy brings a Starlink device to Iran’s envoy and talks about “regime change in Iran.”
The war has only brought Iranians closer together behind the flag. Israel’s attempts at generating an internal revolution have failed and will continue to do so.
🤮57👍11🤡4🤬4❤2
Signed Laura Aboli
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,139 posts we hold for @LauraAbolichannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 370 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 331 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Wide Awake Media @wideawakemedia · 27,142 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 September 2026
Dr. Simon @goddek · 39,329 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
David Icke Official Telegram @davidickeofficial · 42,746 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 28 August 2026
Dr Jane Ruby @DrJaneRuby · 58,422 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 August 2026
Robin Monotti @robinmg · 68,021 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
World Doctors Alliance @worlddoctorsalliance · 76,344 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 19 August 2026
FallCabal Official Channel @Fall_of_the_Cabal · 82,223 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 18 August 2026
Real World News @RealWorldNewsChannel · 25,209 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 14 September 2026
Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel @DrMikeYeadonsolochannel · 26,014 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026
The Exposé News (Official) @dailyexpose · 27,989 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 September 2026
The Mark Attwood Show: Adventures in a Cosmic Suit 2 @theMarkAttwoodShow · 21,018 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 25 September 2026
Lee Merritt MD: FreedomDoc1 @FreedomDoc1 · 24,534 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 16 September 2026
Dr David Martin @DrDavidMartin · 50,651 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 August 2026
Children’s Health Defense @childrenshd · 53,485 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 24 August 2026
Health Ranger @RealHealthRanger · 63,519 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
Dr. Tenpenny @DrTenpenny · 89,219 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 August 2026
The TRUTH About Cancer | Vaccines @TheTruthAboutCancer_Vaccines · 28,944 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 8 September 2026
Forbidden History @Forbidden_History_tg · 33,965 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 3 September 2026
COVID VACCINE VICTIMS AND FAMILIES @covid19vaccinevictims · 38,351 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 31 August 2026
Christiane Northrup M.D @drchristianenorthrup · 41,810 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 29 August 2026
Reiner Fuellmich 🇺🇸/🇬🇧/🇦🇺 @ReinerFuellmichEnglish · 84,719 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 August 2026
Tarot By Janine Channel @TarotByJanineChannel · 55,122 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 20 September 2026
Dr. Judy Mikovits @dr_judymikovitss · 25,578 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 September 2026
Dr Mike Yeadon @DrMikeYeadon · 27,285 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 September 2026
This channel appears in 183 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LauraAboli” (@LauraAbolichannel), 168,866 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LauraAbolichannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.