vernetzungstreffen leoben

Channel
Coronadatencheck.com
@coronadatencheck
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
18,475subscribers
-7,552 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001249895240 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @coronadatencheck |
| Description | Ich bin, weil Wir sind - indem wir uns vernetzen, werden wir bewußter! Also bitte nicht folgen, sondern mittun! Die geteilten Inhalte spiegeln nicht eine Meinung, sondern sollen zum nachdenken anregen! |
| Created | 17 March 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 64 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/coronadatencheck |
Topic
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2026, 02:29 | 18,475 | -6 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 22:00 | 18,481 | -5 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 21:35 | 18,486 | -4 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 22:04 | 18,490 | -7 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 20:50 | 18,497 | -4 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 19:51 | 18,501 | -6 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 16:34 | 18,507 | -3 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 19:01 | 18,510 | -17 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 19:29 | 18,527 | +1 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 22:06 | 18,526 | -6 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 18:58 | 18,532 | +1 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 21:27 | 18,531 | +16 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 19:30 | 18,515 | -14 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 18:49 | 18,529 | -2 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 19:37 | 18,531 | -3 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 17:45 | 18,534 | -6 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 18:09 | 18,540 | -8 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 20:18 | 18,548 | -8 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 13:59 | 18,556 | -6 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 12:59 | 18,562 | first reading |
Engagement
284 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 72 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 19.0%
- avg views ÷ 18,475 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,520
- 39 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.02%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 39
- of 284 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 36 of 39 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 284 (5 August 2026 – 9 November 2026) |
| Views total | 137,141 |
| Reactions total | 1,339 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Nov 2026, 04:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈11,700
- Videos
- ≈13,700
- Links
- ≈23,400
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 7h 41m
- Average length
- 4m 34s
Measured directly from 101 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8,591 reactions across 260 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 7,792 | 90.7% | |
| 👎 | 799 | 9.30% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 264 of the 284 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,687 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 284 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 13 of 39 posts held from the last 30 days (33.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
The coup, the shooting and whatever else they try, is all about this… https://t.me/LauraAbolichannel
👍30
immer mehr erkennen die Machenschaften. Denkt an das Buch 334 Promil Lüge und überlegt, ob Politiker Werkzeuge, oder Leiter sind ...
👍23
Regierungen warnen! Komisch - Jein? https://youtu.be/M_WGW7RIWs4?is=K1mUzPA_6R81AXKa #deutungshoheit #isteseinclub #bewußtsein #reset
👍26
Das Problem ist: Vor einigen Tagen kündigte Tusk an, dass zu Beginn von November einzelne, bewaffnete Provokateure aus Russland nach Polen eingeschleust werden würden und möglicherweise eine Bedrohung darstellen könnten. Gleichzeitig zog er die gesamte Polizei aus Krakau zurück. Und nun verübt eine einzelne, bewaffnete Person einen Angriff, genau wie Tusk vorhergesagt hatte, aber es stellte sich heraus, dass es sic…
👍51
Russell Brand muss nun möglicherweise den Rest seines Lebens im Gefängnis verbringen. - Keine DNA-Spuren - Keine forensischen Beweise - Kein Video - ABSOLUT NICHTS Nur ein paar Frauen, die sich zu Wort meldeten und sagten: „Oh je. Erinnern Sie sich an damals, vor 20 Jahren, als Russell Brand mich vergewaltigte? Ich sollte das besser melden.“ Derselbe Russell Brand, der: - Die Pharmaindustrie herausgefordert hat -…
👍73👎5
#krieg #nationalsozialismus #wirklichkeit #rechtssystem
👍33
Rudolf Höß im Verhör: Was er über Auschwitz aussagte https://youtu.be/u4XgFRO2SKI?is=siC861MV6U5eZMBO #krieg #nationalsozialismus
👍21
Hier die korrigierte Form - danke Michael! Statt V 11/2022-4 richtig: V 294/2021 https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/Dokumente/Vfgh/JFT_20220317_21V00294_00/JFT_20220317_21V00294_00.html
👍11
Lieber Jaroslav! Ich hab mir erlaubt, deine wunderbare Arbeit in ein anderes Format zu bringen: das ganze Dossier als eine einzige HTML-Datei, wo alles beieinander ist. Die 35 Tatsachen nach Themen zum Filtern, eine Suche, jede Tatsache Schritt für Schritt vom Leitnarrativ bis zur rechtlichen Konsequenz, die Quellen aus deinem Verzeichnis direkt im Text verlinkt, deine Buchtipps mit Link, und die passenden Ausschnit…
👍45
Sie nannten es Rechtsprechung - Die Demontage des Grazer Urteils das ist ein youtubevideo zum thema, was wissen wir heute zu corona und wieso sprechen grazer gerichte so einen humbug? https://youtu.be/OmdGiWGxyUU - auf https://coronadatencheck.com/gesinnungsjustiz-statt-evidenz-der-fall-dr-gradnig-und-die-demaskierung-des-landesgerichts-graz/ findet ihr den ganzen beitrag, wäre toll, wenn ihr mir sagt, ob ihr das vi…
👍49
Vorbereitung, Bürgerkrieg, Reset!? https://youtu.be/zBXQwzHdDzA #bewußtsein #tun #reset
👍68
Showing the 12 most recent of 284 posts we hold for @coronadatencheck. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@coronadatencheck edited 40 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 7 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @coronadatencheck as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 1 September 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 1 September 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 16 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@pleiteticker · 50819 postsUNN - Unabhängig-Neutrale Nachrichten
@unabhaengig_neutral · 22,0137 postsMiMo Tv
@mimo_tv · 1,1385 postsRolf Kron - Ärzte stehen auf Offizieller Kanal
@Rolf_Kron · 43,8722 postsINFORMATIONEN-WAHRHEIT-SATIRE und ein bissl Wahnsinn 🤡😎🤬
@horstru · 4502 postsDr. med. Carola Javid- Kistel MITEINANDER MUTIG SEIN- ÄRZTE STEHEN AUF FÜR PATIENTEN.....🙏❤
@miteinander_mutig_sein · 27,0382 postsArchivnetzwerk - Sonstiges
@Archivnetzwerk_sonstiges · 271 postBjörn Eybl
@BjoernEybl · 4,3311 postFrank Köstler öffentlich
@FrankKoestler · 18,1431 postGesund ins Goldene Zeitalter 🌈🌞🦋🔥
@FreiheitdurchGesundheit · 2691 postLifestyleMedizin
@LifestyleMedizin · 181 post٤ԓ🌐zwischen.welten
@NutzloseEsser · 171 postRundumGesund Gesundheitsförderung
@RundumGsunt · 951 postTeleBine
@TeleBine · 61 postDer letzte Zeitwächter
@der_letzte_zeitwaechter · 71 postDie 3 Affen
@die3Affen · 291 postDr.Daniel Langhans, Kommunikationstrainer & Aktivist für die Menschenwürde
@drdaniellanghans · 4,7121 postFilmgeschichten.com®
@filmgeschichtencom · 2071 postWerteWandelBilderWelt
@weltderBILDER · 21 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@geroldbeneder · 15,99113 postsLauraAboli
@LauraAbolichannel · 165,37611 postsAUF1
@auf1tv · 271,9103 postsOliver Janich & Team
@oliverjanich · 106,2923 postsEva Herman Offiziell
@EvaHermanOffiziell · 187,9722 postsmaraswelt
@maraswelt · 32 postsBeatrix von Storch
@BeatrixvStorch · 14,6901 post𝗕𝗲𝗳𝗿𝗲𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗿.𝗕𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗸
@BefreiterBlick · 2,9161 postCOMPACT-Magazin
@CompactMagazin · 76,7651 postHAINTZ.media 🇩🇪🇦🇹🇨🇭🇪🇸
@Haintz · 72,2641 postJUNGE FREIHEIT
@JUNGE_FREIHEIT_Official · 20,1621 postLach- und Krachgeschichten
@LachenmitKleintod · 7,3681 postLachkanal
@Lachkanal · 40,3501 postNetzwerk KRiStA - Kritische Richter und Staatsanwälte
@Netzwerk_KRiStA · 7,7491 postPHANTOM - SCHWEIZ 👔
@PhantomSchweiz · 60,9821 postDer Waldgang
@WaldgangAlbdruck · 14,5041 postWarum Deutschland seine Geschichte nicht aufarbeitet
@WarumDeutschlandSeineGeschichte · 11,5861 post🌎 Wetteradler🌤
@WetteradlerKanal · 111,2591 postApollo News
@apollonews_de · 19,2531 postArminius Erben
@arminius_erben · 30,1261 postConspiracy Music Guru
@conspiracymusic · 3,7791 postEtica.Media 🕊 Corage.Media
@eticamedia · 3,0691 postFelix aus Tria
@felixaustrialieder · 5431 post👀 Finde den Fehler 👀
@findefehler · 3,4361 postGradido-Kanal
@gradido · 7691 postNius
@niusde · 35,3381 postSelberdenken rockt
@selberdenkenrockt · 5991 postStefan Magnet
@stefanmagnet · 68,1201 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@LauraAbolichannel · 165,37617 postsEva Herman Offiziell
@EvaHermanOffiziell · 187,9722 postsmaraswelt
@maraswelt · 32 postsArminius Erben
@arminius_erben · 30,1261 postAUF1
@auf1tv · 271,9101 postCOMPACT-Magazin
@CompactMagazin · 76,7651 postPavel Durov
@durov · 10,078,9051 postEtica.Media 🕊 Corage.Media
@eticamedia · 3,0691 post👀 Finde den Fehler 👀
@findefehler · 3,4361 postHeiko Schöning offiziell
@heiko_schoening · 34,0741 postJUNGE FREIHEIT
@JUNGE_FREIHEIT_Official · 20,1621 postKla.TV - Klagemauer TV
@KlagemauerTV · 75,1861 postLachkanal
@Lachkanal · 40,3501 postOliver Janich & Team
@oliverjanich · 106,2921 postPHANTOM - SCHWEIZ 👔
@PhantomSchweiz · 60,9821 postRobert W Malone, MD
@RWMaloneMD · 103,1151 postDer Waldgang
@WaldgangAlbdruck · 14,5041 postWarum Deutschland seine Geschichte nicht aufarbeitet
@WarumDeutschlandSeineGeschichte · 11,5861 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@rppinstitut · 60,890
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 21 August 2026
@gema1963 · 30,871
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 5 September 2026
@OVALmedia · 21,952
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 21 September 2026
@MartinRutter · 23,029
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 18 September 2026
@HKickl · 31,679
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 5 September 2026
@hajosgedanken_offiziell · 31,195
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 5 September 2026
@stefanmagnet · 68,120
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 20 August 2026
@apolut · 86,257
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 17 August 2026
@traukeinempromioffiziell · 39,162
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 30 August 2026
@Wolff_Ernst · 21,710
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 22 September 2026
@Gesundheitslehrer · 40,928
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 30 August 2026
@t5mtxr8b · 23,143
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 19 September 2026
@bernie006 · 32,320
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 4 September 2026
@rabbitresearch · 81,899
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 18 August 2026
@Qbavaria · 26,873
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 11 September 2026
@GrapheneAgenda · 70,214
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 20 August 2026
@waswirklichist · 59,533
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 22 August 2026
@auf1tv · 271,910
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026
@schwurblerhumor · 38,527
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 31 August 2026
@stwfullford · 20,939
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 24 September 2026
@MARKmobil · 115,748
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Coronadatencheck.com” (@coronadatencheck), 18,475 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/coronadatencheck.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.