Channel
@PhantomSchweiz
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
61,037subscribers
+450 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001250607618 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PhantomSchweiz |
| Description | 💻 Phantom Schweiz - Dunkelheit durchdringen, Wahrheit ans Licht bringen. |
| Created | 4 March 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PhantomSchweiz |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 14:38 | 61,037 | -19 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 14:16 | 61,056 | -4 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 17:27 | 61,060 | -11 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 13:56 | 61,071 | -14 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 14:57 | 61,085 | -14 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 12:56 | 61,099 | -42 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 11:06 | 61,141 | -15 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 13:10 | 61,156 | -19 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 13:41 | 61,175 | -20 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 09:26 | 61,195 | -22 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 06:36 | 61,217 | -9 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 08:46 | 61,226 | -15 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 09:06 | 61,241 | -11 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 10:26 | 61,252 | -7 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 07:17 | 61,259 | -6 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 05:38 | 61,265 | -5 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 01:08 | 61,270 | -14 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 20:18 | 61,284 | -17 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 18:40 | 61,301 | -15 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 18:28 | 61,316 | first reading |
347 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 190 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 347 (18 July 2026 – 13 October 2026) |
| Views total | 251,060 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 23:38 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 142 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @PhantomSchweiz. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 347 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 July 2026 to 13 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 31 posts held from the last 30 days (3.23%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
‼️🖐 Wärmebildkamera - Unsichtbares sichtbar machen Mit dem ATN-BlazeSeeker-Wärmebildgerät erkennen Sie Wärmequellen unabhängig von Lichtverhältnissen, präzise, zuverlässig und in Echtzeit. Gerade bei Stromausfall, in unübersichtlichen Situationen oder bei eingeschränkter Sicht verschafft Ihnen diese Technologie einen entscheidenden Vorteil. Im Gegensatz zu klassischen Nachtsichtgeräten arbeitet der BlazeSeeker voll…
‼️🤯 EagleEye: Der digitale Röntgenblick auf dem Schlachtfeld ist da! Palmer Luckey, der Gründer von Oculus VR stellte bei Joe Rogan Andurils neues EagleEye-System vor. Das KI-gestützte Headset soll Soldaten ein Echtzeit-Lagebild des Schlachtfelds direkt ins Sichtfeld projizieren. Mithilfe von Augmented Reality werden feindliche Bedrohungen, verbündete Einheiten und wichtige Geländepunkte auf dem Visier hervorgehobe…
🇰🇷😳 Kleidung, die sich selbst anzieht Forscher in Südkorea arbeiten an Kleidung, die sich nahezu selbstständig an den Körper anpassen und anziehen lässt. Möglich wird das durch intelligente Materialien und technische Mechanismen. Was heute noch wie Science-Fiction wirkt, könnte künftig vor allem Menschen mit eingeschränkter Beweglichkeit im Alltag unterstützen. Gleichzeitig zeigt sie, wie zunehmend selbst alltägli…
‼️🇩🇰🤖 Es beginnt: Humanoide Roboter füllen in Dänemark die Supermarktregale auf. Der grösste Handelskonzern des Landes testet den Einsatz menschenähnlicher Roboter in einer Filiale nahe Kopenhagen. Was heute noch ungewöhnlich erscheint, könnte schon in den kommenden Jahren zum normalen Bild unseres Arbeitsalltags gehören. Meine Kanäle: ⚡️ Phantom-Schweiz 📱 Twitter/X 📱 Facebook 📱 Instagram
👃 Google-Forschung ermöglicht erstmals die Teleportation eines Geruchs Was bisher nach Science-Fiction klang, könnte Realität werden: Osmo hat eine Technologie entwickelt, mit der sich Gerüche digital erfassen, speichern und an einem anderen Ort wiedergeben lassen. Osmo ist ein eigenständiges Unternehmen, das 2022 aus der Forschungsabteilung von Google hervorgegangen ist. 🧪 1. Geruch erfassen Eine Maschine saugt L…
🛞 KI entwickelt futuristisches Turbinenteil in nur zwei Wochen Was normalerweise deutlich mehr Zeit in Anspruch nimmt, gelang dem KI-Unternehmen Neuron in nur zwei Wochen. Die Entwicklung eines voll funktionsfähigen Turbinenteils mithilfe künstlicher Intelligenz. 🧠 Statt auf klassische Konstruktionsmethoden zu setzen, erzeugte die KI komplexe, organisch-fraktale Formen und untersuchte Geometrien, die sich deutlich …
‼️🕳🐇 Jeffrey Epstein, Transhumanismus & die Eugeniker Bewegung - Ein tiefes Rabbithole. Die Enthüllungen rund um Jeffrey Epstein werfen bis heute ein grelles Licht auf die dunklen Schnittstellen zwischen Macht, Wissenschaft und fragwürdigen Zukunftsvisionen. Was in den veröffentlichten E-Mails, Aussagen und Recherchen auftaucht, ist erschreckend und zeigt erneut, wie leicht einzelne Milliardäre versuchen können, Wis…
‼️🤖 Das Brooklyn Projekt – der geheime Plan zur Neuerfindung des Menschen Das Brooklyn Projekt wirkt wie das Manhattan-Projekt des 21. Jahrhunderts, nur dass diesmal nicht die Atombombe im Zentrum steht, sondern der Mensch selbst. Ausgehend von Spuren in den veröffentlichten Epstein-Akten rekonstruiert Frank Höfer ein Netzwerk aus Wissenschaftlern, Investoren und Visionären, das an weit mehr dachte als an künstlich…
🇺🇳🧠 UN warnt vor Technologie zum Gedankenlesen In einem Bericht des Generalsekretärs wurde davor gewarnt, dass neue Technologien dazu genutzt werden könnten, auf die innersten Gedanken der Menschen zuzugreifen und diese zu kriminalisieren. Die Szenarien klingen wie Science-Fiction: Polizisten, die auf Daten im Gehirn von Verdächtigen zugreifen, um gewaltsam Informationen zu gewinnen oder um vorherzusagen, ob die Tä…
🧠 Gedankenlesen mit KI ist nun möglich: Gehirnscanner rekonstruiert Bilder aus dem Kopf 🇮🇱 Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel | September 2026 Forscher des Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel haben mit „Brain-IT“ ein KI-Modell entwickelt, das mithilfe von Gehirnscans Bilder rekonstruiert, die eine Person betrachtet hat. Dafür analysiert die KI die Aktivitätsmuster verschiedener Hirnregionen und erzeugt darau…
🔥🔥 KI-Fehler bei Geheimdienst hätte fast US-Militäreinsatz gegen China ausgelöst! „Fast einen Krieg verursacht“: Wegen eines fehlerhaften, mit KI erstellten US-Geheimdienstberichts hätte das US-Militär während des Iran-Kriegs beinahe ein chinesisches Schiff geentert. Das berichtet CNN unter Berufung auf mehrere mit dem Vorfall vertraute Personen. Laut dem fehlerhaften Bericht sei das Schiff mit Komponenten für Ato…
⚠️⚰️ Bevölkerungsreduktion - Die wahren Absichten der Klimaagenda Meine Kanäle: ⚡️ Phantom-Schweiz 📱 Twitter/X 📱 Facebook 📱 Instagram
Showing the 12 most recent of 347 posts we hold for @PhantomSchweiz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@PhantomSchweiz edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 7 posts on @PhantomSchweiz as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 100 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 101 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 157 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PHANTOM - SCHWEIZ 👔” (@PhantomSchweiz), 61,037 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PhantomSchweiz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.