Independent Journalist committed to the truth to the best of my knowledge and belief since 2001.
paypal.me/henningrosenbusch
IBAN: DE67 7607 0024 0858 2066 00
Created
8 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
35 measurements spanning 44 days, net -238. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 72,160–72,470 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 19:41
72,196
-7
16 Sept 2026, 11:22
72,203
-3
14 Sept 2026, 16:58
72,206
-37
13 Sept 2026, 02:18
72,243
-7
11 Sept 2026, 00:16
72,250
-19
8 Sept 2026, 01:19
72,269
-9
4 Sept 2026, 20:56
72,278
+9
3 Sept 2026, 05:49
72,269
-5
1 Sept 2026, 22:38
72,274
-16
1 Sept 2026, 00:34
72,290
+18
30 Aug 2026, 20:56
72,272
-6
29 Aug 2026, 22:37
72,278
-9
28 Aug 2026, 21:57
72,287
-12
27 Aug 2026, 21:42
72,299
-13
26 Aug 2026, 23:25
72,312
-4
25 Aug 2026, 20:03
72,316
-15
24 Aug 2026, 20:27
72,331
-22
23 Aug 2026, 06:26
72,353
-13
21 Aug 2026, 18:07
72,366
-1
20 Aug 2026, 17:12
72,367
first reading
Engagement
650 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 93 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
23.8%
avg views ÷ 72,196 subscribers
Avg views / post
17,200
407 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.62%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
408
of 650 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 September 2026
Posts held
650 (4 August 2026 – 20 September 2026)
Views total
6,986,190
Reactions total
253,067
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
21 Sept 2026, 00:42 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈24,300
Videos
≈3,500
Links
≈27,100
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 21 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2h 25m
Average length
1m 20s
Measured directly from 109 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
391,992 reactions across 635 posts, in 70 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
71,430
18.2%
💯
43,743
11.2%
🤮
36,976
9.43%
🤣
33,820
8.63%
🤡
25,783
6.58%
🔥
25,595
6.53%
🤬
23,502
6.00%
❤
19,340
4.93%
🖕
19,049
4.86%
👏
13,826
3.53%
💩
11,866
3.03%
😁
9,492
2.42%
🌭
8,421
2.15%
🍌
7,463
1.90%
🕊
6,401
1.63%
🙈
3,899
0.995%
🤯
3,320
0.847%
😈
3,202
0.817%
🤔
2,926
0.746%
😢
2,872
0.733%
50 further kinds
19,066
4.86%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 648 of the 650 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 400,589 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 650 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 20 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
405
across the posts below
Posts paid on
134
of 648 we hold a reading for · 21%
Most on one post
21
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rosenbusch. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 650 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 20 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
0.154%
1 of 650 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
13,300
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
15,600
over 647 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 650 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 20 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
"Zur Begründung führt die EU-Exekutive demnach erneut wenig plausible Argumente an: Eine Aufbewahrung der Nachrichten zur Bearbeitung von Auskunftsersuchen aus der Öffentlichkeit lasse sich nicht mit den erforderlichen Maßnahmen zur Cybersicherheit vereinbaren.
Zuvor hatte es geheißen: Das Auto-Delete sei eingestellt, um Speicherplatz auf dem Smartphone der Präsidentin zu sparen."
Selbstlöschende Nachrichten zu uns…
Die wichtigste und gleichzeitig traurigste Erkenntnis aus den drei Wahlen im September:
Die selbsternannte Mitte weicht inhaltlich, trotz existenzbedrohender Verluste, keinen Millimeter vom eingeschlagenen Kurs aufs Riff ab.
„Mutti“ ist immer noch da: „alternativlos“.
t.me/Rosenbusch
Sunday Times:
„Merkel war die wahre Extremistin unserer Zeit“
(…)
„Doch lassen Sie mich mit Merkel schließen, der wohl schlechtesten der modernen westlichen Politikerinnen (und ich hatte noch nicht einmal Zeit, ihre katastrophale Atompolitik zu schildern).
Sie hat Maßnahmen befürwortet, von denen sie wusste, dass sie den Menschen am unteren Ende der Gesellschaft schaden würden, aber (natürlich) nicht solchen wie …
Es handelt sich um einen autoritären Korporatismus.
Kennzeichnend ist die erzwungene Einbindung wirtschaftlicher und gesellschaftlicher Organisationen in hierarchische und autoritäre Entscheidungsverfahren.
Vgl. Schubert, Klaus/Martina Klein: Das Politiklexikon.
t.me/Rosenbusch
Es bleibt wichtig diese Heuchler und Opportunisten, die jetzt wieder vor Ausgrenzung warnen, daran zu erinnern, wie sie selbst Millionen Menschen herabgewürdigt, diskriminiert und vor allem entrechtet haben.
Immer wieder.
#RichtigErinnern
t.me/Rosenbusch
Putin soll eine Eskalation des Kriegs gegen die Ukraine vorbereiten, inklusive hybrider Angriffe auf europäische Verbündete Kiews.
Der Telegraph beruft sich auf westliche Geheimdienstquellen, die eine “stealth mobilisation” und verstärkte hybride Operationen gegen Unterstützer der Ukraine erwarten.
Und es ist völlig egal, was daran stimmt, die Eskalationsspirale dreht sich weiter.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-…
Der kometenhafte Aufstieg des Corona-Generals kennt kein Halten…
https://www.n-tv.de/politik/Bundeswehr-General-Breuer-bekommt-eines-der-wichtigsten-Nato-Aemter-id31325070.html
t.me/Rosenbusch
Andrick:
„Ist der politische Gegner demagogisch zum Feind der Menschheit erklärt und sind alle wesentlichen Diskursfelder durchmoralisiert, so endet die sachliche Debatte, und die real vorhandenen Meinungen werden nicht mehr angstfrei diskutiert.
Der Realitätsabschied der Bundesregierung ist komplett. Und die Aussagen Weidels, die nichts weniger implizieren als das völlige Scheitern Deutschlands, werden nicht mehr i…
"Bundeswehr startet Zwangsmusterung für junge Männer. Auch 18-Jährige, die nicht zur Bundeswehr wollen, müssen jetzt damit rechnen, zur verpflichtenden Musterung geladen zu werden."
https://www.morgenpost.de/politik/article413187251/bundeswehr-musterung-zwang-wer-jetzt-einladung-bekommt.html
t.me/Rosenbusch
„Für Xhaka und die Ärztin gilt die Unschuldsvermutung. Aber klar ist, dass die Causa das Potenzial zum veritablen Skandal hat. Schon Xhakas Nationalmannschaftskollege Breel Embolo hatte mit gefälschten Covid-Zertifikaten von sich reden gemacht. Im Verfahren gegen ein früheres Hells-Angels-Mitglied vor dem Basler Strafgericht wurde im Mai 2024 publik, dass sich der Stürmer gefälschte Testzertifikate für Reisen besorgt…
„Die Gefahr ist real, denn die Mischung aus Fußball und Politik ist in der jüngeren Vergangenheit selten gut ausgegangen. Der größte Beweis dafür ist die WM in Katar, bei der Bundes-Coach Hansi Flick unter anderem an der Politisierung des Sports scheiterte.
Während die Spieler sich symbolisch den Mund hielten und damit gegen ein Regenbogenbinden-Verbot protestierten – und später blamabel ausschieden, glänzte Innenmi…
🤮343🖕134🤣106🤡50❤36💩18👏12👍10
Showing the 12 most recent of 650 posts we hold for @rosenbusch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@rosenbusch edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
16 September 2026
Most recent edit
16 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 442 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 490 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
4
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
4
vacant every time we have ever looked
@rosenbusch named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@rosenbusvh named in 6 posts, 16 August 2026 – 15 September 2026
@matthiashopfin1 named in 2 posts, 19 September 2026 – 20 September 2026
@mdlbothe named in 1 post, 6 September 2026 – 6 September 2026
@roeenbusch named in 1 post, 25 August 2026 – 25 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Tom Lausen ‼️❗️original Datenanalyst @TomLausen · 45,533 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 27 August 2026
Multipolar Magazin @multipolar_magazin · 22,894 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 September 2026
Ken Jebsen Backup @kenjebsen_backup · 26,433 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 September 2026
Anwälte-für-Aufklärung @Anwaelte_fuer_Aufklaerung · 48,456 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 26 August 2026
Ken Jebsen - Aufklärung und Information @kenjebsen · 123,304 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
Politik Spezial @PolitikSpezial · 26,823 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 September 2026
MEINE D-NEWS 🇩🇪 🇦🇹 🇨🇭 @MeineDNEWS · 55,820 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 23 August 2026
Dr. med. Carola Javid- Kistel MITEINANDER MUTIG SEIN- ÄRZTE STEHEN AUF FÜR PATIENTEN.....🙏❤ @miteinander_mutig_sein · 27,312 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 11 September 2026
RA Ludwig - Querdenkeranwalt @RA_Ludwig · 63,744 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 21 August 2026
▫️Rechtsanwältin Beate Bahner @rechtsanwaeltin_beate_bahner · 82,818 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
Kontrafunk - Die Stimme der Vernunft @kontrafunk2 · 24,475 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 16 September 2026
Unabhängige Nachrichten @nachrichtenportal · 25,978 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 13 September 2026
STEFAN HOMBURG @StefanHomburgOffiziel · 137,232 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 19 September 2026
AUF1 @auf1tv · 273,431 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026
Dave Brych Kanal @davebrych_public · 27,778 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 10 September 2026
Snicklink unzensiert @snicklink3000 · 32,245 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 5 September 2026
MetanoiaMagazin @MetanoiaMagazin · 39,074 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 31 August 2026
MARC FRIEDRICH ⋆ @MarcFriedrichDeut · 225,749 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 30 August 2026
RABBIT RESEARCH @rabbitresearch · 83,503 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 18 August 2026
Kanal Rechtsanwalt Dirk Sattelmaier @rasattelmaier · 38,923 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 31 August 2026
achse:ostwest @achseostwest · 26,444 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 September 2026
Ignaz Bearth offiziell @ignazbearth · 33,138 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 4 September 2026
Sara Bennett Lightfight @saraslightfight · 57,169 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 23 August 2026
Klartext20/21-Gemeinsam 👍🏻Info-kanal🔝🖤🤍❤️ @Klartext2021Gemeinsam · 64,143 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 128 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“henning rosenbusch - Channel” (@rosenbusch), 72,196 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rosenbusch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
