National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 7 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (2 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 2 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 60 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 7, the earliest publisher we hold is @Qanalwwg1wga. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 6 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
34 measurements spanning 42 days, net +214. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,230–22,532 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 05:39
22,479
-14
15 Sept 2026, 03:57
22,493
-4
13 Sept 2026, 12:21
22,497
+27
11 Sept 2026, 14:56
22,470
+28
8 Sept 2026, 21:58
22,442
+68
5 Sept 2026, 12:01
22,374
+19
3 Sept 2026, 13:17
22,355
+9
2 Sept 2026, 05:34
22,346
+4
1 Sept 2026, 04:05
22,342
+1
31 Aug 2026, 02:29
22,341
+1
30 Aug 2026, 02:53
22,340
-6
29 Aug 2026, 02:04
22,346
-14
27 Aug 2026, 22:58
22,360
+8
27 Aug 2026, 00:58
22,352
+4
26 Aug 2026, 04:03
22,348
+3
25 Aug 2026, 05:53
22,345
+13
24 Aug 2026, 06:54
22,332
+1
22 Aug 2026, 15:07
22,331
+9
21 Aug 2026, 03:34
22,322
+4
20 Aug 2026, 00:33
22,318
first reading
Engagement
731 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.1%
avg views ÷ 22,479 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,940
271 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
271
of 731 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
731 (5 August 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total
795,714
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 12:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4h 08m
Average length
50s
Measured directly from 297 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Advertising
Ad load
0.137%
1 of 731 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
2,330
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
3,390
over 730 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
eologischen
1
28 August 2026
28 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 731 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Einer der Gründe warum integrierte Ausländer die AFD wählen 🙏
https://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/article6a855314d537b08639dcc9da/vorfall-in-marzahn-scheiss-kanake-rassismus-vorwuerfe-gegen-berliner-linken-fraktionsvize.html
☀️🍷🍿 Lust auf Gute Laune?
♟️🐇📕 Lust auf Wissen?
„Flüssigkeit verspritzt: 9 Verletzte bei Angriff auf AfD-Stand“
Schuld daran ist JEDER, der die AfD dämonisiert und ausgrenzt. Beim nächsten Mal gibt es 9 Schwerverletzte und dann Tote. Es ist EURE Schuld, weil Ihr die Irren gegen uns aufhetzt, denen Eure Beschimpfungen „Nazi, Faschist…“ einfach nicht ausreichen. Die machen dann EURE Arbeit, eben nur mit ihren Mitteln.
Wieder ein Brandanschlag!
Zwei Unbekannte sollen auf dem Gelände einer Betonfirma in Rosbach nördlich von Frankfurt einen Brandsatz zwischen abgestellten Lastwagen platziert haben. Fünf Betonmischer gingen in Flammen auf. Der Schaden ist massiv. Die Polizei prüft ein Bekennerschreiben.
Gegen 1.10 Uhr alarmierten Zeugen die Polizei in der Nacht zu Mittwoch über das Feuer in Rosbach vor der Höhe (Hessen). Als die Ein…
Die Gedanken sind frei 🎶
Schöner Anblick - bitte bald quer durch Deutschland mehr davon!
Forstfest Kamenz 2026
Das Forstfest ist ein traditionelles Schul- und Heimatfest in Kamenz, Sachsen das in der Woche um den 24. August gefeiert wird und in dessen Zentrum der Ein- und Auszug der Kamenzer Schüler steht. Es ist Teil des dt. Kulturerbes und feiert dieses Jahr 800. Jubiläum
https://t.me/danijelsheran
Die spanische Polizei ermittelt nach einem Vorfall, bei dem eine große Gruppe illegaler Migranten, hauptsächlich Marokkaner, begleitet von Mitgliedern einer von George Soros finanzierten NGO, große Mengen Salzsäure und Alufolie in einem Supermarkt in Ceuta gekauft haben, die möglicherweise zur Herstellung hausgemachter Säurebomben gegen Polizei und spanische Zivilisten gedacht sein könnten.
Die NGO heißt No Name Kit…
Erster Fall von Wahlfälschung in Sachsen-Anhalt?
Prüft gemeinsam mit euren Verwandten, ob es weitere Fälle gibt! ~ Ulrich Siegmund
https://ostdeutscheallgemeine.com/article/exklusiv-wahlbetrug-mit-der-stimme-einer-dementen-95-jaehrigen-bevollmaechtigter-stellt-strafanzeige-10353231
https://x.com/UlrichSiegmund/status/2095415558992716272
https://t.me/danijelsheran
Deutschland: Ernte 2026 katastrophal
Die Dürre hat in Deutschland zu massiven Ernteverlusten geführt. Zugleich bringen hohe Diesel- und Düngerpreise viele Landwirte zusätzlich in Bedrängnis. Dennoch will Landwirtschaftsminister Alois Rainer keinen nationalen Notstand ausrufen.
https://de-rtnews.com/inland/290514-deutschland-ernte-2026-katastrophal/
Nach Angaben des russischen Außenministers Sergej Lawrow (76) wird das Goethe-Institut in Russland geschlossen. Es handle sich um eine Reaktion auf die angekündigte Schließung des Russischen Hauses in Berlin.
https://m.bild.de/politik/ausland-und-internationales/russland-schliesst-laut-putin-minister-goethe-institut-im-eigenen-land-6a98e668c53a6557d48ddc89
Anschlag auf die Zentrale des Technologie- und Rüstungskonzerns Rohde & Schwarz!
In München sind in der Nacht Brandsätze auf eine Baustelle der Firma geworfen worden. Einer der Brandsätze zündete, einen zweiten mussten Spezialkräfte unschädlich machen. Zwei Verdächtige wurden festgenommen.
Gegen Mitternacht hatte ein Zeuge die Polizei alarmiert. Er berichtete, dass im Münchner Stadtteil Berg am Laim aus einem Auto …
Deutschland früh morgens halb 9 Uhr. Die meisten fahren in die Arbeit, die Touristen fahren frühstücken und einige fahren ins benachbarte Tschechien, wo Benzin mittlerweile 60 cent billiger ist als hier. Alles ruhig. Keiner regt sich auf, alles ganz normal. Das Autoradio plärrt, die Supermärkte füllen sich und der Einkaufswagen wird immer teurer. Keiner regt sich auf, alles ganz normal. Und ich verharre in der Fassun…
In Spanien hat man genug von illegaler Massenmigration und der sozialistischen Regierung. Massenproteste im ganzen Land. Von Madrid bis Bilbao fordert man den Sánchez Rücktritt. In den deutschen Medien dazu Schweigen.
ARD: Stille
ZDF: Stille
Bild: Stille
SZ: Stille
Spiegel: Stille
FAZ: Stille
Tagesspiegel: Stille
Warum nur?
XPOST
Dirk Dietrich https://t.me/DDDDoffiziell 🔥
Showing the 12 most recent of 731 posts we hold for @danijelsheran. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 267 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 284 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
8
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
8
vacant every time we have ever looked
@danijelsheran named 8 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@alice_weidel named in 2 posts, 24 August 2026 – 24 August 2026
@ulrichsiegmund named in 2 posts, 18 August 2026 – 23 August 2026
@visithvar named in 1 post, 31 August 2026 – 31 August 2026
@eca_as named in 1 post, 19 August 2026 – 19 August 2026
@fbidirectorkash named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
@meteovalledosta named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@afdberlin named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@randpaul named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
HDK - HINTER DEN KULISSEN @HDKTelegram · 43,889 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 29 August 2026
Veikko aka Son Go Q @BitchBotBoiiLive · 71,467 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 20 August 2026
Patriotische Stimme für Deutschland⚡frei- unabhängig-patriotisch @patriotischestimmedeutschlands · 24,894 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 15 September 2026
True Bavaria @Qbavaria · 27,350 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 11 September 2026
[ℂ𝕠𝕟𝕤𝕡𝕚𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪𝕟𝕖𝕨𝕤𝕣𝕠𝕠𝕞] @CNconspiracynewsroom · 26,855 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 11 September 2026
🌘 Der andere Blickwinkel 🌒 @Blickwinkel · 73,374 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 19 August 2026
AKASHA.TV @akasha_tv · 28,644 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 9 September 2026
Metropol Chronicles @metropolchronicles · 25,459 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 14 September 2026
𝙳𝙴𝚁 𝟷𝟽. 𝚂𝚃𝙰𝙼𝙼𝚃𝙸𝚂𝙲𝙷 𝙺𝙰𝙽𝙰𝙻 💛💥 @der17stammtisch · 40,215 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 30 August 2026
Lichtweiser @lichtweiser · 45,888 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 27 August 2026
DeutschRussische Freundschaft - Немецко-российский @Deutsch_Russische_Freunde · 25,801 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 13 September 2026
Wahrheitsjäger @Wahrheits_jaeger · 83,480 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 18 August 2026
⚡️Q+++⚡️ @QPLUSPLUSPLUS · 53,279 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 3 September 2026
MARKmobil @MARKmobil · 116,560 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 August 2026
HaJos Gedanken @hajosgedanken_offiziell · 31,605 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 5 September 2026
💥Booom Aktuell💥Austausch über das aktuelle Weltgeschehen...🌍 @booomaktuell · 33,680 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 3 September 2026
henning rosenbusch - Channel @rosenbusch · 72,196 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 August 2026
Sirius 🌕 Das Christus-Bewusstsein @AramaicChristus · 26,169 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 13 September 2026
Bleib Stark 🤜🤛 @bleibtstark · 25,856 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 13 September 2026
Qlobal-Change 🫂 @QlobalChange · 93,501 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 16 August 2026
ALLES ÜBER DIE NWO, WHO, WEF, UN, EU, GREAT RESET, CO2 KLIMAWANDELLÜGE, CORONA PLANDEMIE @horst250936 · 25,134 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 14 September 2026
Wissen ist Macht offiziell @wissenistmacht1 · 33,536 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 4 September 2026
Kampf für unsere Zukunft ❣️ @Kampf_fuer_unsere_Zukunft · 49,314 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 38 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Danijel_Sheran17 ✨” (@danijelsheran), 22,479 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/danijelsheran.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
