National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 7 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (2 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 2 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 60 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 7, the earliest publisher we hold is @Qanalwwg1wga. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 6 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
62 measurements spanning 93 days, net +548. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,181–22,906 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 20:27
22,813
-9
5 Nov 2026, 19:06
22,822
+12
4 Nov 2026, 17:09
22,810
+37
3 Nov 2026, 16:00
22,773
+17
2 Nov 2026, 17:19
22,756
+19
1 Nov 2026, 17:51
22,737
+9
31 Oct 2026, 18:39
22,728
-9
30 Oct 2026, 17:45
22,737
+12
29 Oct 2026, 18:06
22,725
-11
28 Oct 2026, 18:41
22,736
-8
27 Oct 2026, 19:07
22,744
-5
26 Oct 2026, 21:56
22,749
+16
25 Oct 2026, 20:47
22,733
+113
24 Oct 2026, 18:26
22,620
-2
23 Oct 2026, 21:56
22,622
-9
22 Oct 2026, 19:26
22,631
+10
21 Oct 2026, 16:49
22,621
+10
20 Oct 2026, 15:46
22,611
+10
19 Oct 2026, 14:16
22,601
+17
18 Oct 2026, 14:40
22,584
first reading
Engagement
1,341 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 93 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.9%
avg views ÷ 22,813 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,410
331 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
331
of 1,341 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
1,341 (5 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
1,128,112
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 14:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
6h 20m
Average length
54s
Measured directly from 426 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Advertising
Ad load
0.1%
1 of 1,000 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
2,330
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
2,680
over 999 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
eologischen
1
28 August 2026
28 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 19 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 151 of 331 posts held from the last 30 days (45.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
President Trump: "Als Präsident befürworte ich Superintelligenz (SI) uneingeschränkt und werde mit den vielen US-Bundesstaaten zusammenarbeiten, die durch deren Einsatz REICH werden wollen. Sie ist GOLD wert, und nur eine törichte Führung würde zu diesem Reichtum „NEIN“ sagen! Präsident DJT"
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/117569389226840480
https://t.me/danijelsheran
Die tschechische Polizei meldet, dass auch am Freitag mehrere Bombendrohungen gegen abgehende und ankommende Flüge nach Prag eingegangen sind. Betroffen sind offenbar aber auch andere Linienflüge.
Zunächst hatte ein Pilot der maltesischen Billig-Airline Wizz Alarm geschlagen. Auf dem Weg vom Flughafen Prag nach Rom setzte er den Transponder-Code 7700 (allgemeiner Luftnotfall) ab. Der Airbus A321 musste umkehren, lan…
🎙 Aus der Rede des Präsidenten der Russischen Föderation Wladimir Putin bei der feierlichen Verleihung staatlicher Auszeichnungen am 4. November 2026
💬 Gerade jetzt ist es besonders wichtig, dass die Menschen in vielen Ländern – nicht nur in den Ländern, die Sie vertreten – Folgendes erkennen: Erstens hat Russland noch nie jemanden bedroht und tut dies auch heute nicht. Zweitens streben wir nach Zusammenarbeit. Diej…
Glückwunsch an Alexander von Bismarck zur Puschkin-Medaille!
In Zeiten blockierter Kanäle zeigt er Mut zum Dialog.
Wie schon sein Vorfahre Otto v. Bismarck wusste: Frieden & Wohlstand in Europa gibt es nur MIT und nicht GEGEN Russland.🇩🇪🇷🇺
Starke Geste für echte Diplomatie! 🕊️🤝
https://x.com/AldousHuxIey/status/2118436896636596732?a=0n6LrKF9qTvvL_iV9mc&s=19
https://t.me/danijelsheran
04.11.2026 - Das gefällt President Putin!
Ein deutscher im Kreml, der Präsident Putin auf deutsch (souverän) danke sagt & eine kleine Rede hält!
…. und der Präsident folgte seinem Vortrag ohne die Notwendigkeit eines Dolmetschers
Putin ehrt Alexander von Bismarck mit dem Puschkin Orden.
Alexander:
"Wenn Russland und Deutschland Freunde sind, wird alles in Europa gut sein.”
https://x.com/Kipling93624194/status/2…
PapiTrumpo: "Wenn ich zum Himmel aufsehe, bin ich dankbar.
Jedes einzelne Mal.
Nicht, weil ich mir vorstelle, dass es dort oben ein imaginäres Paradies gibt.
Sondern, weil ich weiß, dass Gott uns ein echtes Paradies hier unten geschaffen hat."
https://x.com/PapiTrumpo/status/2118501167466508620?a=77T3Ld6V6So10VnYX5w&s=19
https://t.me/danijelsheran
Elon Musk fragt: „What is love?“ – und all seine Follower singen mit!
What is love?
(Baby don’t hurt me)
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2118628232002158682?a=hjKUF0U8rjoF_ZTdzNU&s=19
Haddaway 1993 🎶
https://youtu.be/HEXWRTEbj1I?is=859vvSA44s1UZXUC
Liebe = Gott
Gott = WIR
„Ich und der Vater sind eins“
What is love?
Wir sind die pure & reine liebe Gottes!
https://t.me/danijelsheran
Elon Musk schrieb heute auf X: „Es beunruhigt mich sehr, dass wir noch immer kein Zeichen von Außerirdischen sehen.“
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2118595407597203915?a=f8qKixC1anGTkZuLc5E&s=19
https://t.me/danijelsheran
Diana Panchenko hat die Antwort darauf, warum DJT sich NICHT mit dem einen Ukrainer im Weißen Haus getroffen hat:
"Fakt.
Kirill Dmitriev stammt aus der Ukraine.
Selenskyj stammt aus der Ukraine.
Dmitriev hat mit höchsten Auszeichnungen von Stanford und Harvard abgeschlossen. Er hat seine Karriere in führenden globalen Unternehmen in den USA, der Ukraine und Russland verbracht.
Selenskyj hat die Schule im Dorf kau…
Der US-Präsident bestätigte im Weißen Haus, dass er sich in Washington mit Kreml-Unterhändler Kirill Dmitriev (51) getroffen habe.
„Es wird ein großes Abkommen sein“, sagte Trump. „Es wird mehr als nur die Ukraine betreffen, und ich könnte sogar sagen, dass es ganz Europa betreffen könnte.“ Was genau damit gemeint ist, ließ der Präsident offen. Trump behauptete lediglich, am Ende würden alle begeistert sein. Mit den…
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,341 posts we hold for @danijelsheran. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 280 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 305 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
11
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
10
vacant every time we have ever looked
@danijelsheran named 11 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@dojcrimdiv named in 1 post, 2 September 2026 – 2 September 2026 · confirmed gone 5 November 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@atlantikbruecke named in 2 posts, 2 October 2026 – 3 October 2026
@cem_oezdemir named in 2 posts, 2 October 2026 – 3 October 2026
@alice_weidel named in 2 posts, 24 August 2026 – 24 August 2026
@ulrichsiegmund named in 2 posts, 18 August 2026 – 23 August 2026
@visithvar named in 1 post, 31 August 2026 – 31 August 2026
@eca_as named in 1 post, 19 August 2026 – 19 August 2026
@fbidirectorkash named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
@meteovalledosta named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@randpaul named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@afdberlin named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Folge dem Plan @Folgedemplan · 57,658 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 24 September 2026
💣𝐓𝐈𝐐 𝐓𝐎𝐐 𝐁𝐐𝐐𝐌𝐒💣 @TiQToQBQQms · 19,375 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 1 October 2026
HDK - HINTER DEN KULISSEN @HDKTelegram · 41,468 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 29 August 2026
Veikko aka Son Go Q @BitchBotBoiiLive · 71,573 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 20 August 2026
Qfs Die weißen Hüte @QFSQwantum · 20,619 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 26 September 2026
Patriotische Stimme für Deutschland⚡frei- unabhängig-patriotisch @patriotischestimmedeutschlands · 24,576 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 15 September 2026
True Bavaria @Qbavaria · 26,899 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 11 September 2026
[ℂ𝕠𝕟𝕤𝕡𝕚𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪𝕟𝕖𝕨𝕤𝕣𝕠𝕠𝕞] @CNconspiracynewsroom · 26,480 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 11 September 2026
🌘 Der andere Blickwinkel 🌒 @Blickwinkel · 71,946 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 19 August 2026
AKASHA.TV @akasha_tv · 28,348 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 9 September 2026
TranslatedPress DE @TranslatedPressDE · 20,375 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 26 September 2026
Metropol Chronicles @metropolchronicles · 25,485 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 14 September 2026
𝙳𝙴𝚁 𝟷𝟽. 𝚂𝚃𝙰𝙼𝙼𝚃𝙸𝚂𝙲𝙷 𝙺𝙰𝙽𝙰𝙻 💛💥 @der17stammtisch · 39,513 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 30 August 2026
Lichtweiser @lichtweiser · 46,557 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 27 August 2026
Ich hab mal eben durchgezählt, ich hab sie tatsächlich nicht mehr alle 🤪 @nichtmehralle · 21,121 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 24 September 2026
DeutschRussische Freundschaft - Немецко-российский @Deutsch_Russische_Freunde · 25,484 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 13 September 2026
Wahrheitsjäger @Wahrheits_jaeger · 83,234 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 18 August 2026
⚡️Q+++⚡️ @QPLUSPLUSPLUS · 53,751 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 3 September 2026
MARKmobil @MARKmobil · 115,815 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 August 2026
HaJos Gedanken @hajosgedanken_offiziell · 31,227 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 5 September 2026
💥Booom Aktuell💥Austausch über das aktuelle Weltgeschehen...🌍 @booomaktuell · 33,031 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 3 September 2026
henning rosenbusch - Channel @rosenbusch · 71,632 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 August 2026
Benjamin Fulford Berichte @stwfullford · 20,965 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 24 September 2026
This channel appears in 48 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Danijel_Sheran17 ✨” (@danijelsheran), 22,813 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/danijelsheran.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.