Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for J D Vance

Channel

J D Vance

@JDVance

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

19,136subscribers

+8,263 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001736935872
TypeChannel
Username@JDVance
DescriptionChristian, husband, father. U.S. Senator from Ohio.
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/JDVance

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

22,000 average views per post against 19,136 subscribers — an engagement rate of 115.2%. Across the 7,876 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,001–31,621 subscribers, posting mainly in English — the middle half sit between 2.46% and 14.4%, with a median of 6.57%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (2 August 2026 1 September 2026)
Posts measured33 of 33 published in the window (1 exact, 32 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled727,596
Mature posts only130.3% over 29 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers19,136 measured 31 August 2026
Cohortb10000:eng · 7,876 channels · p10 0.683% · p25 2.46% · p50 6.57% · p75 14.4% · p90 26.1%
Position in cohort99.695th percentile · 17.5× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.152% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageEnglish · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 1 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

10,85027,68519,267.56 August 2026 — 10,873 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,870 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,859 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,856 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,850 subscribers11 August 2026 — 27,685 subscribers12 August 2026 — 21,080 subscribers13 August 2026 — 21,007 subscribers14 August 2026 — 20,901 subscribers16 August 2026 — 20,849 subscribers17 August 2026 — 20,813 subscribers18 August 2026 — 20,801 subscribers19 August 2026 — 20,778 subscribers20 August 2026 — 19,700 subscribers21 August 2026 — 19,643 subscribers22 August 2026 — 19,584 subscribers24 August 2026 — 19,519 subscribers25 August 2026 — 19,470 subscribers26 August 2026 — 19,457 subscribers27 August 2026 — 19,424 subscribers28 August 2026 — 19,384 subscribers29 August 2026 — 19,317 subscribers30 August 2026 — 19,258 subscribers31 August 2026 — 19,136 subscribers19,1366 August 202631 August 2026
24 measurements spanning 25 days, net +8,263. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,325–30,210 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 15:1519,136-122
30 Aug 2026, 14:3719,258-59
29 Aug 2026, 17:0319,317-67
28 Aug 2026, 15:0819,384-40
27 Aug 2026, 11:5519,424-33
26 Aug 2026, 13:5219,457-13
25 Aug 2026, 15:2319,470-49
24 Aug 2026, 12:3719,519-65
22 Aug 2026, 22:0719,584-59
21 Aug 2026, 11:1619,643-57
20 Aug 2026, 09:0819,700-1,078
19 Aug 2026, 10:0620,778-23
18 Aug 2026, 13:2620,801-12
17 Aug 2026, 16:2820,813-36
16 Aug 2026, 13:5320,849-52
14 Aug 2026, 20:2520,901-106
13 Aug 2026, 13:0621,007-73
12 Aug 2026, 13:1521,080-6,605
11 Aug 2026, 15:0427,685+16,835
10 Aug 2026, 12:1110,850first reading

Engagement

53 posts held, back to 21 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
115.2%
avg views ÷ 19,136 subscribers
Avg views / post
22,000
33 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
33
of 53 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held53 (21 June 20261 September 2026)
Views total727,596
Reactions total7,531
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Sept 2026, 10:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
263
Videos
890
Links
1,400

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 1 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 13m
Average length
2m 00s

Measured directly from 37 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

13,081 reactions across 52 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4,04931.0%
🙏3,65527.9%
👍2,04715.6%
💯1,47011.2%
👏8666.62%
🤡3152.41%
🔥1311.00%
🤮1220.933%
👎1160.887%
🤔900.688%
🖕680.52%
🤣420.321%
😡380.29%
🏆130.099%
🕊90.069%
🥱90.069%
💔80.061%
🤬60.046%
🥴60.046%
🫡60.046%
8 further kinds150.115%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 53 of the 53 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,423 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 04:32 UTC496 views47 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

VP Vance in Maine: "We're standing up for your workers. We're standing up for your family. We're standing up for the incredible natural beauty of the state of Maine and every single citizen who relies on it."🇺🇸 https://t.me/JDVance

27👍10🙏8🤡2

31 Aug 2026, 19:11 UTC≈1,390 views169 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

Here in Michigan with the great Mike Rogers. We need this man in the Senate, Michigan! Let's make it happen this November🇺🇸 https://t.me/JDVance

🙏11731👍18🤮2🤡1

31 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC≈1,440 views146 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

"We're already seeing significant increase in oil production out of Venezuela... I think it's a mistake to say, 'When will we see increased production?' because we're already seeing increased production." https://t.me/JDVance

👍99🙏328🤣6🤡1

31 Aug 2026, 17:25 UTC≈1,450 views140 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

VP Vance on the @.WHFraudTF's crackdown on fraud in the trucking industry: "We know that trucking is one of the best sources of employment for non college educated men. It was bad for people's jobs, but it also made our streets and our highways a lot less safe." https://t.me/JDVance

👍84🙏26💯216🤡2🤔1

29 Aug 2026, 18:37 UTC≈2,100 views167 reactionsread 1 September 2026

So great to see my friends at Central Pastry Shop in Middletown last week. Glad you had a fun time at the event, and my kids loved the donuts! https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ohio-donut-shop-workers-recount-surprise-jd-vance-encounter-unexpected-turn https://t.me/JDVance

👍11932🙏12🤡3🤮1

29 Aug 2026, 04:46 UTC≈2,230 views226 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

The people of East Palestine deserve a government that is transparent and accountable to them. If the Biden administration withheld public health risks from the community, they must be held accountable. Today, I am formally calling for an investigation into who knew what, and when. https://t.me/JDVance

103💯54👍37🙏25👏2🤔2🤡1🤮1

26 Aug 2026, 17:19 UTC≈2,910 views221 reactionsread 1 September 2026

‘Watershed Moment’: Trump Clears Hormuz Mines, Breaks Iran’s Grip — ‘Now the U.S. Controls It’ https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2026/08/26/watershed-moment-trump-clears-hormuz-mines-breaks-irans-grip-now-the-u-s-controls-it/ https://t.me/JDVance

124🙏65👍17👏10🤡2🏆1🤣1🤮1

24 Aug 2026, 20:03 UTC≈2,950 views229 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

in Maine: "We want good jobs. We want dignity. We want the dignity of knowing that if you work hard and you build something, if you play by the rules, your country is going to have your back... A welfare check is never going to replace a job." https://t.me/JDVance

120💯58🙏34👍12🥴3🤡1🤮1

24 Aug 2026, 19:34 UTC≈2,540 views206 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

"The Trump Administration enacted the single biggest tax cut in history for Maine's workers. We brought down drug costs — TrumpRx — and ensured that our nation's housing supply goes to citizens, not to private equity investors. We provided historic tax relief for Maine parents and families. We have invested a thousand dollars in every new baby born in the United States of America thanks to President Donald J. Trump .

125🙏42👍33🤡2🤣2👀1🤮1

24 Aug 2026, 18:51 UTC≈2,520 views209 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

"For 40 years, places like Brewer have been told that it doesn't matter, that it doesn't matter if we make things here in Maine or 5,000 miles away with foreign workers... Just as it was a policy choice by people in Washington to let that happen to you and your community, in 2024, Brewer made a new choice to reverse 40 years of American decline and send Donald J. Trump back to the White House." https://t.me/JDVance

132🙏47👍19👏5🫡3🤡2🤮1

24 Aug 2026, 18:25 UTC≈2,400 views222 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

"The way to defeat socialism — it's not to throw slogans at people, it's not politician-talk and repeating the same old thing, it's giving people a real stake in the future." https://t.me/JDVance

121🙏56💯28👍12🫡2🤡1🤮1🥴1

22 Aug 2026, 18:27 UTC≈22,800 views274 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

🚨 The DSA is taking over the Democrat Party. ❌ Abolish the police. ❌ Abolish prisons. ❌ Abolish ICE. ❌ Reopen our borders This is the radical agenda Democrats are embracing. Americans deserve to know what’s at stake. https://t.me/JDVance

🙏188👍31😡22💯1711🤡2🥱2🤮1

Showing the 12 most recent of 53 posts we hold for @JDVance. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 5,858 of 1,629,362 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 38 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Turning Point USA
@TPUSA · 47,683
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 August 2026
Dr. Simone Gold
@DrSimoneGold · 82,329
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 August 2026
RealJackHibbs
@jackhibbs · 51,919
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 24 August 2026
Charlie Kirk
@CharlieKirk · 154,067
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
Amir Tsarfati
@beholdisraelchannel · 575,594
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
Glenn Beck Fans
@glennbeck · 37,446
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 1 September 2026
Marjorie Taylor Greene
@RealMarjorieGreene · 58,743
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
Dan Bongino
@DBongino · 108,240
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 August 2026
The Babylon Bee
@TheBabylonBee · 96,540
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 16 August 2026
Mark Levin Warroom
@MarkRLevin · 39,884
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 August 2026
Mike Lindell
@MichaelJLindell · 80,277
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“J D Vance” (@JDVance), 19,136 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JDVance.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.