28 measurements spanning 32 days, net -756. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,494–29,476 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Sept 2026, 11:16
28,607
-81
4 Sept 2026, 16:18
28,688
-34
3 Sept 2026, 01:13
28,722
-17
1 Sept 2026, 22:27
28,739
-19
1 Sept 2026, 00:29
28,758
-34
30 Aug 2026, 21:14
28,792
-18
29 Aug 2026, 18:16
28,810
-28
28 Aug 2026, 18:25
28,838
-13
27 Aug 2026, 20:59
28,851
-20
26 Aug 2026, 23:44
28,871
-14
25 Aug 2026, 23:24
28,885
-23
24 Aug 2026, 23:23
28,908
-41
23 Aug 2026, 08:23
28,949
-35
21 Aug 2026, 19:03
28,984
-31
20 Aug 2026, 13:07
29,015
-50
19 Aug 2026, 10:02
29,065
-17
18 Aug 2026, 11:38
29,082
-25
17 Aug 2026, 13:54
29,107
-19
16 Aug 2026, 08:16
29,126
-54
14 Aug 2026, 17:27
29,180
first reading
Engagement
133 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.01%
avg views ÷ 28,607 subscribers
Avg views / post
862
106 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.46%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
106
of 133 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
133 (3 August 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total
91,379
Reactions total
4,071
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
4 Sept 2026, 12:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1h 51m
Average length
1m 09s
Measured directly from 97 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,151 reactions across 133 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
2,158
41.9%
❤
1,128
21.9%
💯
544
10.6%
🤬
313
6.08%
😈
220
4.27%
👎
151
2.93%
🔥
86
1.67%
🤡
79
1.53%
👏
66
1.28%
🤯
57
1.11%
🥱
50
0.971%
😁
48
0.932%
🙏
46
0.893%
🤪
37
0.718%
🥰
35
0.679%
😴
29
0.563%
🤣
28
0.544%
⚡
18
0.349%
😢
11
0.214%
🤮
9
0.175%
9 further kinds
38
0.738%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 133 of the 133 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,151 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 133 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Going Further is officially a #1 New York Times bestseller!
Clarence Thomas came from crushing poverty, endured vicious racism, and rose to become one of the greatest and most consequential justices in American history.
For decades, the Left tried to diminish him. They failed. https://x.com/tedcruz/status/2095294454219317418/photo/1
@TedCruzTX
James Talarico wants to dismantle the oil and gas industry in Texas and dismantle capitalism.
Don’t miss the latest episode of Verdict where @ benfergusonshow and I discuss all that and more!
Trump Accounts Transform the Future, plus Talarico Pledges to “Dismantle” Capitalism https://x.com/tedcruz/status/2095290172023714112/video/1
@TedCruzTX
James Talarico said capitalism, climate change, and white supremacy are all linked together, and he wants to dismantle all three.
More on the latest episode of Verdict: Trump Accounts Transform the Future, plus Talarico Pledges to “Dismantle” Capitalism
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/trump-accounts-transform-the-future-plus-talarico/id1495601614?i=1000787349147 https://x.com/tedcruz/status/209528740369108589…
President Trump has committed to implementing autoenrollemnt for Trump Accounts.
That is a GAME CHANGER.
@ benferguson and I discuss on the latest episode of Verdict.
Don’t miss the latest episode of Verdict: Trump Accounts Transform the Future, plus Talarico Pledges to https://x.com/tedcruz/status/2095279350686052679/video/1
@TedCruzTX
Too many people campaign as conservatives and turn into jellyfish the minute they arrive in Washington. https://x.com/tedcruz/status/2095277254087492079/video/1
@TedCruzTX
Don’t let the extended family buy another ugly sweater. Have them fund a Trump Account instead.
More on the latest episode of Verdict: Trump Accounts Transform the Future, plus Talarico Pledges to “Dismantle” Capitalism
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/trump-accounts-transform-the-future-plus-talarico/id1495601614?i=1000787349147 https://x.com/tedcruz/status/2095271840373432333/video/1
@TedCruzTX
When I drafted the Trump Accounts legislation, I deliberately included 2 accelerators to help the accounts grow fast:
1. Employers are able to contribute. ✅
2. Charitable contributions. ✅
More on the latest episode of Verdict: Trump Accounts Transform the Future, plus https://x.com/tedcruz/status/2095271159923171574/video/1
@TedCruzTX
Republicans have delivered historic wins on the border security, cutting taxes, rebuilding our military, expanding school choice, and creating Trump Accounts.
There has never been a two-year period with more conservative victories than this year and last.
Celebrate the wins. https://x.com/tedcruz/status/2095246553946439949/video/1
@TedCruzTX
Clarence Thomas was not born a conservative.
He was angry at America. He attended Black Panther rallies. He participated in a riot. He voted for George McGovern.
Understanding how that young radical became one of America’s most important conservative thinkers is essential to https://x.com/tedcruz/status/2095169304777851102/video/1
@TedCruzTX
Thank you, Laura. Coming from someone who clerked for Justice Thomas and saw his brilliance firsthand, that means a great deal.
Clarence Thomas is one of the greatest Justices in American history. GOING FURTHER tells the extraordinary story of his life, his courage, and his https://x.com/tedcruz/status/2095156047770185896/video/1
@TedCruzTX
Trump Accounts Transform the Future plus Talarico Pledges to “Dismantle” Capitalism
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/trump-accounts-transform-the-future-plus-talarico/id1495601614?i=1000787349147
@TedCruzTX
For years, moderates have told conservatives to shut up and support the nominee when their guy wins. Same rule applies now.
The primary is over. Ken Paxton won. Support the nominee.
Texas is too important to hand over to a communist lunatic because Republicans are still https://x.com/tedcruz/status/2094956772805026149/video/1
@TedCruzTX
👍46🥱2
Showing the 12 most recent of 133 posts we hold for @TedCruzTX. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Matt Gaetz @MattGaetzOfficial · 30,550 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 7 September 2026
Candace Owens On Fire🔥 @CandaceOnFire · 30,037 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 7 September 2026
Daily Caller @Daily_Caller · 29,088 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 8 September 2026
Turning Point USA @TPUSA · 47,485 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 August 2026
Daily Wire Junkies @realDailyWire · 39,414 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 August 2026
Ben Shapiro Gang @BenShapiroGang · 54,090 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 August 2026
Dan Bongino @DBongino · 107,827 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 August 2026
Mark Levin Warroom @MarkRLevin · 39,655 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 August 2026
Newsmax Clips @NewsmaxTV · 66,372 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 August 2026
The Western Journal @WesternJournal · 51,490 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 August 2026
Steven Crowder Fans @StevenCrowder · 51,211 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 August 2026
Marjorie Taylor Greene @RealMarjorieGreene · 58,489 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
Fearless Report @FearlessReport · 97,313 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 16 August 2026
Glenn Beck Fans @glennbeck · 37,253 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 1 September 2026
Dinesh D’Souza @DineshJDSouza · 72,214 Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ted Cruz” (@TedCruzTX), 28,607 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TedCruzTX.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.