Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Candace Owens On Fire🔥

Channel

Candace Owens On Fire🔥

@CandaceOnFire

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

29,011subscribers

-1,737 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001283286173
TypeChannel
Username@CandaceOnFire
Description‘Candace On Fire’ is a fan channel dedicated to conservative political commentator and activist Candace Owens — this channel is not associated with or managed by Candace.
Created8 February 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 October 2026
Measurements held48
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/CandaceOnFire

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@CandaceOnFire/4011 · this entry29 Jul 2026, 22:51 UTC@realcandaceo/47629 Jul 2026, 23:02 UTC1.0011 minutes
@CandaceOnFire/4020 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 21:31 UTC@realcandaceo/4853 Aug 2026, 21:43 UTC1.0012 minutes
@CandaceOnFire/4024 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 22:11 UTC@realcandaceo/4894 Aug 2026, 22:21 UTC1.0010 minutes
@CandaceOnFire/4027 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 22:21 UTC@realcandaceo/4925 Aug 2026, 22:24 UTC1.003 minutes
@CandaceOnFire/4030 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 22:36 UTC@realcandaceo/4956 Aug 2026, 22:40 UTC1.005 minutes
@CandaceOnFire/4012 · this entry29 Jul 2026, 23:01 UTC@realcandaceo/47729 Jul 2026, 23:02 UTC0.96under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@realcandaceo12 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.987 minutesthis entry (12–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 16 comparable posts for this entry, running 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @CandaceOnFire — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

29,01130,74829,879.56 August 2026 — 30,748 subscribers6 August 2026 — 30,724 subscribers8 August 2026 — 30,696 subscribers8 August 2026 — 30,675 subscribers9 August 2026 — 30,642 subscribers10 August 2026 — 30,609 subscribers11 August 2026 — 30,592 subscribers12 August 2026 — 30,573 subscribers14 August 2026 — 30,551 subscribers15 August 2026 — 30,509 subscribers16 August 2026 — 30,492 subscribers17 August 2026 — 30,470 subscribers18 August 2026 — 30,452 subscribers19 August 2026 — 30,434 subscribers20 August 2026 — 30,403 subscribers22 August 2026 — 30,365 subscribers24 August 2026 — 30,336 subscribers25 August 2026 — 30,312 subscribers26 August 2026 — 30,303 subscribers26 August 2026 — 30,281 subscribers28 August 2026 — 30,271 subscribers29 August 2026 — 30,241 subscribers30 August 2026 — 30,226 subscribers30 August 2026 — 30,201 subscribers1 September 2026 — 30,164 subscribers2 September 2026 — 30,149 subscribers3 September 2026 — 30,135 subscribers4 September 2026 — 30,100 subscribers7 September 2026 — 30,037 subscribers10 September 2026 — 29,964 subscribers12 September 2026 — 29,923 subscribers14 September 2026 — 29,898 subscribers16 September 2026 — 29,848 subscribers18 September 2026 — 29,790 subscribers2 October 2026 — 29,499 subscribers6 October 2026 — 29,397 subscribers11 October 2026 — 29,328 subscribers14 October 2026 — 29,278 subscribers15 October 2026 — 29,245 subscribers16 October 2026 — 29,227 subscribers17 October 2026 — 29,200 subscribers18 October 2026 — 29,184 subscribers19 October 2026 — 29,174 subscribers20 October 2026 — 29,144 subscribers21 October 2026 — 29,116 subscribers22 October 2026 — 29,082 subscribers23 October 2026 — 29,040 subscribers24 October 2026 — 29,011 subscribers6 August 202624 October 2026
48 measurements spanning 79 days, net -1,737. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,750–31,009 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 48
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Oct 2026, 16:3829,011-29
23 Oct 2026, 14:2629,040-42
22 Oct 2026, 16:1929,082-34
21 Oct 2026, 09:0729,116-28
20 Oct 2026, 05:5929,144-30
19 Oct 2026, 03:3829,174-10
18 Oct 2026, 06:4529,184-16
17 Oct 2026, 08:2829,200-27
16 Oct 2026, 05:2729,227-18
15 Oct 2026, 02:4729,245-33
14 Oct 2026, 00:4029,278-50
11 Oct 2026, 04:5729,328-69
6 Oct 2026, 22:1829,397-102
2 Oct 2026, 02:5929,499-291
18 Sept 2026, 16:2029,790-58
16 Sept 2026, 07:1629,848-50
14 Sept 2026, 12:3829,898-25
12 Sept 2026, 19:2129,923-41
10 Sept 2026, 21:5929,964-73
7 Sept 2026, 19:0130,037first reading

Engagement

193 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 127 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.0%
avg views ÷ 29,011 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,470
68 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.57%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
68
of 193 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 October 2026
Posts held193 (29 July 2026 – 24 October 2026)
Views total235,840
Reactions total3,703
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Oct 2026, 18:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈566
Videos
≈171
Links
≈2,500

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 18s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

11,551 reactions across 193 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥6,70758.1%
❤4,84441.9%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 193 of the 193 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,551 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 193 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 24 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Oct 2026, 05:11 UTC≈1,260 views18 reactionsread 24 October 2026

Wearing Converses Justifies The DEATH PENALTYv? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Px-CjQ2pz48

🔥17❤1

23 Oct 2026, 20:01 UTC≈1,780 views36 reactionsread 24 October 2026

It's Time For A TPUSA Investigation... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=STn2arMT2qA

🔥36

23 Oct 2026, 03:00 UTC≈2,230 views77 reactionsread 24 October 2026

Thank you guys for all of the love tonight! That was a tremendous uplift going through the case from the beginning and assessing the various holes, twists, and evidence—but it was such an important refresher one year on, made only better by @ baroncoleman! Thank you to all the Join @CandaceOnFire!

❤64🔥13

22 Oct 2026, 22:00 UTC≈2,370 views41 reactionsread 24 October 2026

Today on my LAST episode before maternity. @ baroncoleman, the Vice Principal is in for the handoff! -As promised, we take it all the way back to 9/10 providing you with an official guide of the current case, the evidence thus far presented at trial, plus the shifting Federal Join @CandaceOnFire!

❤30🔥11

22 Oct 2026, 21:26 UTC≈2,340 views22 reactionsread 24 October 2026

Candace Owens x Baron Coleman: The Real UVU Review. | Ep 407 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IAVSN4vuCx0

❤22

22 Oct 2026, 12:19 UTC≈2,540 views33 reactionsread 24 October 2026

I am genuinely not sure where this rumor is coming from as it would appear Turning Point USA is launching another cannon of Z-list influencers into our orbit, who will prove all too eager to lie for cash…That aside, allow me to state this unequivocally: at no point before, Join @CandaceOnFire!

❤26🔥7

22 Oct 2026, 03:11 UTC≈2,630 views16 reactionsread 24 October 2026

Is Horror Anti-Christian? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pVcKw7hDI_8

🔥14❤2

21 Oct 2026, 22:19 UTC≈2,700 views34 reactionsread 24 October 2026

Today on the show! -Vivek’s campaign blunder is a symptom of the broader, bizarre Republican messaging ahead of midterms. -ANOTHER middle school revolts against an Erika Kirk appearance (what are we doing guys? Leave the kids alone.) -Allie Stuckey says Christian women Join @CandaceOnFire!

🔥28❤6

21 Oct 2026, 22:11 UTC≈2,620 views21 reactionsread 24 October 2026

Hocus Pocus! Republican’s Bizarre Midterm Message, Erika’s Creepy K-12 Tour, and UVU’s Slender Man. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZxlvNO8OVmc

🔥19❤2

21 Oct 2026, 19:41 UTC≈2,660 views23 reactionsread 24 October 2026

MORE Trump Administration Corruption... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fEfNm5mcjdc

🔥20❤3

20 Oct 2026, 23:58 UTC≈3,120 views40 reactionsread 24 October 2026
Video

Here is a thread featuring the videos from today’s episode of who we believe is the same individual returning to the scene of Losee Rooftop 20 minutes later. As I explained on the show today, I think it is plausible that he dropped the screwdriver during this time. https://x.com/RealCandaceO/status/2112693968500847101/video/1 Join @CandaceOnFire!

🔥39❤1

20 Oct 2026, 22:18 UTC≈2,880 views36 reactionsread 24 October 2026

Today on the show: -We have EXPLOSIVE new footage from UVU. Did “Tyler Robinson” return to Losee Rooftop? Because it certainly looks like someone did… -The Brian Cole patsy story falls apart, so why is he still in prison? -Kimberly Guilfoyle becomes the MAGA-patsy. Relative Join @CandaceOnFire!

🔥35❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 193 posts we hold for @CandaceOnFire. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Tucker Carlson Fanbase
@TuckerFans · 102,286
#1
Tucker Carlson
@TuckerCarlsonNetwork · 204,420
#2
BREAKING HEADLINES
@BREAKINGHEADLINES · 66,109
#3
Trump Supporters Channel 🇺🇸
@TrumpChannel · 131,025
#4
The Babylon Bee
@TheBabylonBee · 93,158
#5
Telegram Feed - PearFEED
@PearFEED · 40,162
#6
Fearless Report
@FearlessReport · 93,708
#7
Marjorie Taylor Greene
@RealMarjorieGreene · 56,176
#8
Based Rand Paul ★★★
@BasedRandPaul · 4,128
#9
Glenn Beck Fans
@glennbeck · 36,201
#10
We The Media
@WeTheMedia · 140,811
#11
Dan Bongino
@DBongino · 104,320
#12
BioClandestine
@bioclandestine · 138,031
#13
Matt Gaetz
@MattGaetzOfficial · 29,386
#14
Let’s Go Brandon (Official)
@LetsGoBrandon · 18,821
#15
One America News Network
@OANNTV · 141,852
#16
Resist the Mainstream
@ResisttheMainstream · 127,298
#17
Conservative Brief
@ConservativeBrief · 53,551
#18
Newsmax Clips
@NewsmaxTV · 64,147
#19
Steven Crowder Fans
@StevenCrowder · 49,460
#20
Russell Brand
@RussellBrand4 · 8,009
#21
Q) The Storm Rider /Official Page
@qthestormrider777 · 153,567
#22
Sergeant News Network 🇺🇸
@SGTnewsNetwork · 110,187
#23
INFOWARS.COM 🚫🚫🚫
@infowarslive · 22,384
#24
Catturd Fan Club
@CatturdFanClub · 22,192
#25
The Federalist
@FDRLSTT · 23,850
#26
Fighting The Commies
@FightingTheCommies · 22,684
#27
Melania Trump
@MelaniaTrumpFan · 4,626
#28
Dinesh D’Souza
@DineshJDSouza · 69,906
#29
Tucker Carlson
@TuckeronX · 14,327
#30
Ben Shapiro Gang
@BenShapiroGang · 52,350
#31
Donald J. Trump
@real_donaldjtrump · 583,217
#32
Charlie Kirk
@CharlieKirk · 149,195
#33
Jack Posobiec
@Jack_Posobiec · 115,012
#34
Dan Scavino FORCE🇺🇸🦅
@DanScavinoFORCE · 88,743
#35
The Epoch Times
@epochtimes · 125,690
#36
James O'Keefe
@JamesOKeefeIII · 163,775
#37
Donald Trump Jr
@TrumpJr · 349,370
#38
The Western Journal
@WesternJournal · 50,049
#39
Gateway Pundit
@gatewaypunditofficial · 109,306
#40
The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@VigilantFox · 119,238
#41
Edward Dowd
@Edward_Dowd · 12,250
#42
The American Tribune
@theamericantribune · 17,439
#43
KanekoaTheGreat
@KanekoaTheGreat · 115,145
#44
The General
@GeneralMCNews · 143,027
#45
David Avocado Wolfe
@davidavocadowolfe · 102,015
#46
James Woods ★★★
@JamesWoodsFans · 72,225
#47
Lara Logan
@NoAgendaLara · 25,771
#48
Ted Cruz
@TedCruzTX · 27,569
#49
General Flynn ️
@RealGenFlynn · 146,338
#50
Shadow of Ezra
@ShadowofEzra · 145,384
#51
Project Veritas
@project_veritas · 202,008
#52
Follow The White Rabbit ™ 🐇
@followsthewhiterabbit · 79,129
#53
Eva Vlaardingerbroek
@EvaVlaardingerbroek · 11,284
#54
ULTRA Pepe Lives Matter 🐸
@PepeMatter · 143,755
#55
Zeee Media 🎙
@zeeemedia · 53,882
#56
WarRoom: Official Telegram Channel
@BannonWarRoom · 51,059
#57
Nicholas J. Fuentes
@nickjfuentes · 112,964
#58
J D Vance
@JDVance · 13,069
#59
Matt Walsh’s Feed
@MattWalshShow · 8,972
#60
Health Ranger
@RealHealthRanger · 62,826
#61
⚡️ 🇺🇸 Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 🗽
@SidneyPowell · 124,034
#62
The Conspiracy Hole
@TheConspiracyHole · 104,779
#63
Josh Hawley
@Josh_Hawley · 25,621
#64
Tommy Robinson News
@TommyRobinsonNews · 74,712
#65
Libs of TikTok Fans
@libsontiktok · 16,090
#66
O'Keefe Media Group
@OKeefeMediaGroup · 22,011
#67
Dr. Simone Gold
@DrSimoneGold · 79,786
#68
X22 Report Official
@realx22report · 158,398
#69
David Icke Official Telegram
@davidickeofficial · 42,419
#70
Children’s Health Defense
@childrenshd · 52,703
#71
Robin Monotti
@robinmg · 67,211
#72
Robert W Malone, MD
@RWMaloneMD · 103,844
#73
LAURA LOOMER
@loomeredofficial · 19,411
#74
Jim Jordan
@JimJordanOH · 16,785
#75
GEORGENEWS
@georgenews · 141,851
#76
NTD
@NTDNews · 52,272
#77
il Donaldo Trumpo
@RealDonaldoTrumpo · 154,524
#78
Disclose.tv
@disclosetv · 318,716
#79
America’s Doctors
@AmericasDoctors · 18,357
#80
Barbara O'Neill
@BarbaraOneill_official · 109,714
#81
Mike Lindell
@MichaelJLindell · 77,440
#82
🇺🇸👊🏻Richard Citizen Journalist 👊🏻🇺🇸
@Richardcitizenjournalists · 107,541
#83
CultivateElevate
@ElevateThyMind · 76,364
#84
STRANGER THAN FICTION NEWS
@stfn_news · 62,281
#85
Lauren Chen
@thelaurenchen · 8,775
#86
Right Side Broadcasting Network (RSBN)
@rsbnetwork · 101,254
#87

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 7 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Tucker Carlson Fanbase
@TuckerFans · 102,286
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 August 2026
Glenn Beck Fans
@glennbeck · 36,201
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 1 September 2026
Ben Shapiro Gang
@BenShapiroGang · 52,350
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 August 2026
Steven Crowder Fans
@StevenCrowder · 49,460
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 August 2026
Trump Supporters Channel 🇺🇸
@TrumpChannel · 131,025
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 August 2026
Telegram Feed - PearFEED
@PearFEED · 40,162
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 29 August 2026
The Babylon Bee
@TheBabylonBee · 93,158
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 16 August 2026
Matt Gaetz
@MattGaetzOfficial · 29,386
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 7 September 2026
Analyzing America
@analyzingamerica · 34,341
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026
Fearless Report
@FearlessReport · 93,708
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 16 August 2026
Ted Cruz
@TedCruzTX · 27,569
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
Daily Wire Junkies
@realDailyWire · 38,159
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 August 2026
Health Nut News/Erin Elizabeth
@erinhealthnutnews · 20,728
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 24 September 2026
Dr. Edward Group, DC
@drgroupofficial · 19,618
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 30 September 2026
Josh Hawley
@Josh_Hawley · 25,621
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 12 September 2026
James O'Keefe
@JamesOKeefeIII · 163,775
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
GreenMedInfo
@sayeregengmi · 27,578
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 September 2026
The Western Journal
@WesternJournal · 50,049
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Candace Owens On Fire🔥” (@CandaceOnFire), 29,011 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CandaceOnFire.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.