Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Conservative Brief

Channel

Conservative Brief

@ConservativeBrief

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

55,798subscribers

-1,045 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001435088198
TypeChannel
Username@ConservativeBrief
Created15 March 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ConservativeBrief

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

55,79856,84356,320.56 August 2026 — 56,843 subscribers6 August 2026 — 56,829 subscribers7 August 2026 — 56,760 subscribers8 August 2026 — 56,727 subscribers9 August 2026 — 56,681 subscribers10 August 2026 — 56,597 subscribers11 August 2026 — 56,569 subscribers12 August 2026 — 56,558 subscribers14 August 2026 — 56,495 subscribers15 August 2026 — 56,403 subscribers17 August 2026 — 56,340 subscribers18 August 2026 — 56,310 subscribers19 August 2026 — 56,269 subscribers20 August 2026 — 56,217 subscribers20 August 2026 — 56,191 subscribers22 August 2026 — 56,138 subscribers23 August 2026 — 56,067 subscribers25 August 2026 — 56,016 subscribers26 August 2026 — 55,973 subscribers27 August 2026 — 55,947 subscribers28 August 2026 — 55,904 subscribers29 August 2026 — 55,838 subscribers30 August 2026 — 55,798 subscribers6 August 202630 August 2026
23 measurements spanning 24 days, net -1,045. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 55,641–57,000 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 07:0255,798-40
29 Aug 2026, 05:1855,838-66
28 Aug 2026, 04:2455,904-43
27 Aug 2026, 02:3255,947-26
26 Aug 2026, 05:4355,973-43
25 Aug 2026, 03:4656,016-51
23 Aug 2026, 20:0856,067-71
22 Aug 2026, 04:1656,138-53
20 Aug 2026, 22:4856,191-26
20 Aug 2026, 02:0456,217-52
19 Aug 2026, 05:0656,269-41
18 Aug 2026, 07:4256,310-30
17 Aug 2026, 09:3856,340-63
15 Aug 2026, 19:1356,403-92
14 Aug 2026, 07:4456,495-63
12 Aug 2026, 21:0356,558-11
11 Aug 2026, 18:4656,569-28
10 Aug 2026, 19:4156,597-84
9 Aug 2026, 18:1256,681-46
8 Aug 2026, 17:3156,727first reading

Engagement

534 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.04%
avg views ÷ 55,798 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,140
534 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.15%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
534
of 534 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 531 of 534 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026
Posts held534 (5 August 202630 August 2026)
Views total609,175
Reactions total31,371
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Aug 2026, 03:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2h 08m
Average length
52s

Measured directly from 149 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

31,371 reactions across 531 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤮11,88237.9%
👍8,58427.4%
6,78621.6%
🔥1,9866.33%
👎1,0453.33%
😢9262.95%
😱1620.516%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 531 of the 534 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31,371reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 534 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Aug 2026, 00:00 UTC756 views53 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Video

MUST SEE!!! Democrat U.S. Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed: "Here's this one thing Hasan [Piker] said ("America deserved 9/11"), do you now condemn him...? And I'm like, what f*cking world does the world work this way? In what world would you condemn somebody for something that they've said if you're serious about the project of actually persuading somebody?"

🤮503

29 Aug 2026, 23:45 UTC734 views56 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Video

ATTENTION AMERICANS!!! If you're willing to give up the money and influence you spent your blood and sweat earning, then Democrat U.S. Senate nominee James Talarico wants YOU: “If you are okay with getting taxed more, if you’re okay with me limiting your influence in politics, you are welcome to join this movement that we are building.”

🤮56

29 Aug 2026, 23:37 UTC691 views59 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Video

And There it Is! The always wonderful Democrat poster boy Hasan Piker: “I have no problem with the Houthis... If you think I’m a terrorism supporter for that reason, then yeah, I’m a f*cking terrorism supporter!”

🤮59

29 Aug 2026, 23:34 UTC680 views61 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Video

Oh, Look! Bernie Sanders, fresh out of the mausoleum, chastises Americans as being "pathetic" for not wanting socialist-run health care in the United States.

🤮59🔥2

29 Aug 2026, 23:29 UTC661 views61 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Video

Learn To Read The Room! How pathetic is this - Michigan Democrats just had their State Convention, featuring Senate candidate Abdul-El Sayed and Democrat gubernatorial candidate Jocelyn Benson, and less people showed up than on your average Friday night at Arby's! SO humiliating!

👍553🤮3

29 Aug 2026, 23:25 UTC669 views55 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Video

BREAKING President Trump is expected to meet with oil refining executives on Tuesday to discuss measures to lower gas prices in America. Source: Fox News

👍54🔥1

29 Aug 2026, 23:22 UTC691 views45 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Video

Democrat U.S. Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed - who embraced the endorsement and platform of Hasan Piker leading up to the party primary - now tries to push back and distance himself from the controversial left-wing influencer: “I’m gonna stop you right there…I am not interested in a conversation about a social media person in California.”

🤮45

29 Aug 2026, 17:34 UTC≈1,160 views48 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Who asked for this? https://conservativebrief.com/mamdani-charge-twice-103935/

🤮46🔥2

29 Aug 2026, 17:22 UTC≈1,070 views42 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Trump has had enough! https://conservativebrief.com/trump-warns-6-104048/

42

29 Aug 2026, 17:06 UTC≈1,010 views41 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

How many more rounds before Election Day? https://conservativebrief.com/trump-block-104046/

41

29 Aug 2026, 16:52 UTC≈1,020 views45 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Dems never saw it coming! https://conservativebrief.com/house-bill-3-104044/

👍405

29 Aug 2026, 16:22 UTC≈1,030 views31 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Not the news she was looking for! https://conservativebrief.com/dems-harris-104042/

👍292

Showing the 12 most recent of 534 posts we hold for @ConservativeBrief. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 226,201 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

James Woods ★★★
@JamesWoodsFans · 74,742
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
Newsmax Clips
@NewsmaxTV · 66,718
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 August 2026
Steven Crowder Fans
@StevenCrowder · 51,575
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 August 2026
Trump Supporters Channel 🇺🇸
@TrumpChannel · 136,606
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 August 2026
Dinesh D’Souza
@DineshJDSouza · 72,635
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
Charlie Kirk
@CharlieKirk · 154,278
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
BREAKING HEADLINES
@BREAKINGHEADLINES · 69,012
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
One America News Network
@OANNTV · 146,811
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
The Western Journal
@WesternJournal · 51,721
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 August 2026
Turning Point USA
@TPUSA · 47,712
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 August 2026
The Epoch Times
@epochtimes · 129,947
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 August 2026
Donald Trump Jr
@TrumpJr · 362,273
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 August 2026
Mike Lindell
@MichaelJLindell · 80,389
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
Project Veritas
@project_veritas · 209,246
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
⚡️ 🇺🇸 Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 🗽
@SidneyPowell · 129,025
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Conservative Brief” (@ConservativeBrief), 55,798 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ConservativeBrief.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.