“Stop paying taxes!” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dCpbUgl3U98

Channel
Dinesh D’Souza
@DineshJDSouza
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry
71,631subscribers
-2,251 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001406639052 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DineshJDSouza |
| Description | I am an author, filmmaker, and host of the Dinesh D'Souza Podcast. Subscribe here TODAY: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-dinesh-dsouza-podcast/id1547827376 |
| Created | 12 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DineshJDSouza |
Topic
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 01:42 | 71,631 | -69 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 23:17 | 71,700 | -113 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 07:21 | 71,813 | -100 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:58 | 71,913 | -144 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 08:00 | 72,057 | -157 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 05:38 | 72,214 | -175 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 13:19 | 72,389 | -57 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 03:08 | 72,446 | -53 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:34 | 72,499 | -28 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:36 | 72,527 | -67 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:58 | 72,594 | -41 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 21:16 | 72,635 | -40 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:34 | 72,675 | -64 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:33 | 72,739 | -51 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 01:14 | 72,790 | -33 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 72,823 | -54 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:35 | 72,877 | -64 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:36 | 72,941 | -68 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 73,009 | -79 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:13 | 73,088 | first reading |
Engagement
161 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 101 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.23%
- avg views ÷ 71,631 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,030
- 73 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 73
- of 161 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 161 (29 July 2026 – 24 September 2026) |
| Views total | 221,280 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Sept 2026, 01:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈760
- Videos
- ≈431
- Links
- ≈18,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 30m 35s
- Average length
- 1m 11s
Measured directly from 26 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
A Baptist pastor’s candid review. https://richbitterman.com/2026/09/22/the-stones-cry-out-review/
New episode: ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE CRUCIFIXION OF JESUS https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1NI_QkBolqM
Charlie handed his opponents a microphone. His alleged killer chose a bullet. My guest Frank Turek gives a firsthand account of Charlie Kirk’s final moments—and a warning about where political hatred can lead.
https://www.prageru.com/videos/dinesh-dsouza-whats-so-great-about-america
This is the story of a 17 year old who came to America, lived the American dream, and has now spent three decades trying to convey what makes this country unique.
“Altruistic filicide.” Let’s say it’s true. Lindsay Clancy thought she was doing her children a favor by deliberately strangling them. How is this not first degree murder?
Imagine being on a boat, not very different from one that carried Jesus and the apostles, on the Lake of Gennesaret—otherwise known as the Sea of Galilee. My book “The Stones Cry Out” has maps, timelines, color photos and QR codes that link to on-site locations and artifacts.
The problem isn’t lack of assimilation. These guys have assimilated. But to what? To the culture of one of the most left-wing universities in the U.S. That’s why Asian Americans raised with conservative values still vote Left. They do it to prove they’ve “become American.”
How come liberals never say? “Thank God that man who killed his wife in a psychotic rage got the help he needed.” “Thank God those Nazis who went berserk on that migrant got the help they needed.” “Thank God that racist lunatic who lynched those blacks got the help he needed.”
New episode on Rumble: LINDSAY CLANCY’S REAL MOTIVE https://rumble.com/v7fifkk-lindsay-clancys-real-motive.html
Isn’t anyone who senselessly kills three other people—let alone one’s own kids—either a sociopath or a psychopath? Isn’t that behavior inherently psychotic? “But she had postpartum psychosis.” Who cares what type of psychosis it is?
Showing the 12 most recent of 161 posts we hold for @DineshJDSouza. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@TrumpJr · 357,086#1
@real_donaldjtrump · 593,162#2
@DBongino · 106,897#3
@Jack_Posobiec · 117,451#4
@OANNTV · 145,109#5
@epochtimes · 128,370#6
@TheBabylonBee · 95,276#7
@ResisttheMainstream · 130,027#8
@gatewaypunditofficial · 110,730#9
@TuckerFans · 105,447#10
@realx22report · 160,968#11
@BREAKINGHEADLINES · 67,943#12
@JamesWoodsFans · 73,968#13
@TrumpChannel · 134,619#14
@KanekoaTheGreat · 117,219#15
@StevenCrowder · 50,783#16
@ConservativeBrief · 54,870#17
@NTDNews · 53,597#18
@FearlessReport · 96,431#19
@NewsmaxTV · 65,684#20
@RaheemKassam · 7,785#21
@PearFEED · 41,322#22
@realDailyWire · 39,074#23
@analyzingamerica · 35,254#24
@MattGaetzOfficial · 30,200#25
@FDRLSTT · 24,519#26
@ThePostMillennial · 19,470#27
@AmericanSpectator · 43,073#28
@LizHarrington76 · 22,953#29
@PepeMatter · 146,341#30
@BenShapiroGang · 53,619#31
@bioclandestine · 139,192#32
@VigilantFox · 120,482#33
@RealDonaldoTrumpo · 155,981#34
@TheStormHasArrived17 · 92,725#35
@ShadowofEzra · 147,226#36
@Newsmax · 9,402#37
@glennbeck · 36,987#38
@FightingTheCommies · 23,267#39
@MarkRLevin · 39,260#40
@jackhibbs · 51,539#41
@RealAmericasVoice · 7,142#42
@qthestormrider777 · 155,787#43
@LetsGoBrandon · 19,192#44
@NoAgendaLara · 26,102#45
@LauraAbolichannel · 168,866#46
@CharlieKirk · 151,701#47
@JamesOKeefeIII · 167,068#48
@RealGenFlynn · 149,219#49
@MichaelJLindell · 79,221#50
@RealMarjorieGreene · 57,874#51
@WesternJournal · 51,086#52
@SidneyPowell · 127,205#53
@rsbnetwork · 103,061#54
@ElectionHQ2024 · 69,581#55
@DanScavinoFORCE · 90,076#56
@disclosetv · 322,872#57
@georgenews · 144,438#58
@BennyJohnson · 63,168#59
@project_veritas · 206,484#60
@BannonWarRoom · 52,030#61
@JudicialWatch · 7,686#62
@loomeredofficial · 19,498#63
@wendyrogersaz · 45,898#64
@CodeMonkeyZ · 125,706#65
@praying_medic · 97,951#66
@Andy_Ngo · 34,545#67
@Daily_Caller · 28,872#68
@beckernews · 28,300#69
@TPUSA · 47,158#70
@insiderpaper · 108,477#71
@GeneralMCNews · 144,492#72
@theamericantribune · 17,878#73
@WeTheMedia · 143,429#74
@SGTnewsNetwork · 111,343#75
@SantaSurfing · 124,189#76
@realKariLake · 22,293#77
@Julie_Kelly2 · 2,277#78
@BasedRandPaul · 4,229#79
@Richardcitizenjournalists · 110,046#80
@OKeefeMediaGroup · 22,425#81
@DrSimoneGold · 81,464#82
@NicholasVeniamin · 92,154#83
@libsontiktok · 16,279#84
@theijr · 9,100#85
@theprofessorsrecord · 50,775#86
@RPPharmacistOfficial · 51,726#87
@SarahHuckabee · 23,974#88
@TedCruzTX · 28,337#89
@nationalpulse · 8,733#90
@Josh_Hawley · 26,289#91
@beholdisraelchannel · 570,519#92
@ScottPresler · 16,904#93
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@realDailyWire · 39,074
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 August 2026
@AmericanSpectator · 43,073
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 August 2026
@DBongino · 106,897
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 August 2026
@StevenCrowder · 50,783
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 August 2026
@analyzingamerica · 35,254
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026
@BenShapiroGang · 53,619
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 August 2026
@JamesWoodsFans · 73,968
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
@Daily_Caller · 28,872
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 8 September 2026
@MichaelJLindell · 79,221
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
@TrumpJr · 357,086
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 August 2026
@TheBabylonBee · 95,276
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 16 August 2026
@CandaceOnFire · 29,790
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 7 September 2026
@glennbeck · 36,987
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 1 September 2026
@rsbnetwork · 103,061
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 15 August 2026
@SarahHuckabee · 23,974
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 16 September 2026
@NewsmaxTV · 65,684
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 August 2026
@TuckerFans · 105,447
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 August 2026
@TPUSA · 47,158
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 August 2026
@FearlessReport · 96,431
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 16 August 2026
@PearFEED · 41,322
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 29 August 2026
@MattGaetzOfficial · 30,200
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 7 September 2026
@JamesOKeefeIII · 167,068
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
@MichaelRPompeo · 24,669
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 15 September 2026
@wendyrogersaz · 45,898
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 33 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | Dinesh D'Souza |
|---|---|
| Description | Indian-American political commentator (born 1961) |
| X / Twitter | @DineshDSouza |
| YouTube | UC8GAOCAJxBL4bExaUCvwL4Q |
| Official site | https://www.dineshdsouza.com/ |
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dinesh D’Souza” (@DineshJDSouza), 71,631 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DineshJDSouza.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.