Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 44 days, net -1,917. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 53,331–55,824 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 07:40
53,619
-124
16 Sept 2026, 23:55
53,743
-34
15 Sept 2026, 00:37
53,777
-95
13 Sept 2026, 08:59
53,872
-111
11 Sept 2026, 15:18
53,983
-107
9 Sept 2026, 00:19
54,090
-153
5 Sept 2026, 13:20
54,243
-90
3 Sept 2026, 17:55
54,333
-38
2 Sept 2026, 06:42
54,371
-20
1 Sept 2026, 09:35
54,391
-53
31 Aug 2026, 06:44
54,444
-34
30 Aug 2026, 09:17
54,478
-31
29 Aug 2026, 07:36
54,509
-54
28 Aug 2026, 08:34
54,563
-55
27 Aug 2026, 09:04
54,618
-10
26 Aug 2026, 11:04
54,628
-52
25 Aug 2026, 11:22
54,680
-18
24 Aug 2026, 07:45
54,698
-85
22 Aug 2026, 16:13
54,783
-54
21 Aug 2026, 10:15
54,837
first reading
Engagement
85 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 95 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.29%
avg views ÷ 53,619 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,300
37 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
37
of 85 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 September 2026
Posts held
85 (16 July 2026 – 18 September 2026)
Views total
85,150
Reactions total
1,742
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Sept 2026, 04:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈351
Videos
≈98
Links
≈2,720
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2h 06m
Average length
7m 55s
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,158 reactions across 85 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,115
26.8%
💯
1,102
26.5%
❤
356
8.56%
🤬
308
7.41%
👏
285
6.85%
🤣
147
3.54%
🤡
132
3.17%
🙏
107
2.57%
😁
97
2.33%
💔
91
2.19%
🤮
59
1.42%
👎
56
1.35%
🔥
56
1.35%
🤯
45
1.08%
😢
42
1.01%
💩
33
0.794%
🤔
31
0.746%
👀
23
0.553%
😱
17
0.409%
🖕
15
0.361%
10 further kinds
41
0.986%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 85 of the 85 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,158 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 85 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 18 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Dario Amodei frantically warned the world we need to "Pace the Frontier" of AI. His biggest competitor Sam Altman immediately agreed. Both are now asking Washington to slow down the very technology making them rich. Is their cry of imminent danger to humanity real, or the most
@BenShapiroGang
Reviewers are apoplectic about Run, Hide, Fight: Infidels... and the movie is a hit! Plus, the Federal Reserve just hiked interest rates, and the Left is very upset about Sydney Sweeney posing nude or something.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JyZk4igQ22I&t=5s
@BenShapiroGang
"Are you contemptuous of radical leftists who believe that others should be treated with decency, care and respect? If so, this is the film for you." -- @ Variety
Watch it now: RUN, HIDE, FIGHT: INFIDELS
https://www.dailywire.com/videos/run-hide-fight-infidels
@BenShapiroGang
There are, of course, individual Muslims who live lives compatible with Western values. But Islam - as a comprehensive governing structure, and as currently practiced across the globe at scale - is not compatible with Western values. Here’s why.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBhyV0qMsVU
@BenShapiroGang
The Trump administration moves to shut down welfare use by immigrants... and the Democrats are fighting mad about it; pro-terror Mahmoud Khalil sues Columbia University for allegedly being too mean to him; and Donald Trump Jr. receives a very nice wedding gift from a Russian
@BenShapiroGang
So, Bill Maher just said the obvious about Islam and 9/11. Again. Which means he’ll be excoriated. Again. https://x.com/benshapiro/status/2099591346734448687/video/1
@BenShapiroGang
So, all the closed-source AI bros are now promoting the idea that AI could absolutely kill all of us. Meanwhile, Jacob Coxon, supposed Anthropic and OpenAI whistleblower – supported by Dario Amodei! – is joining up with Bernie Sanders and Steve Bannon to talk about restricting
@BenShapiroGang
Tucker Carlson, on the 25th anniversary of 9/11, has come out in open solidarity with pro-jihadist Senate Democratic candidate Abdul El-Sayed, arguing that America has engaged in terrorism far greater than 9/11. Tucker and Hasan Piker hold hands on this. It might be time for https://x.com/benshapiro/status/2098541488607027285/video/1
@BenShapiroGang
Twenty-five years after 9/11 – a quarter century after Islamic terrorists murdered nearly 3,000 Americans – here’s where we stand:
The mayor of New York is an Islamic terrorist sympathizer.
So is the Democratic Senate candidate in Michigan.
So are Congresspeople from New York to
@BenShapiroGang
If you were an alien who landed on Earth this morning, and you were reading the top headlines on the NYT's webpage, you would immediately assume that 9/11 was an attack on Muslims.
@BenShapiroGang
🤬58💯14❤3🤨2👍1🤣1😭1
Showing the 12 most recent of 85 posts we hold for @BenShapiroGang. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Daily Wire Junkies @realDailyWire · 39,074 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 August 2026
Steven Crowder Fans @StevenCrowder · 50,783 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 August 2026
Dan Bongino @DBongino · 106,897 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 August 2026
Newsmax Clips @NewsmaxTV · 65,684 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 August 2026
James Woods ★★★ @JamesWoodsFans · 73,968 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
Analyzing America @analyzingamerica · 35,254 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026
Daily Caller @Daily_Caller · 28,872 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 8 September 2026
Candace Owens On Fire🔥 @CandaceOnFire · 29,790 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 7 September 2026
Dinesh D’Souza @DineshJDSouza · 71,631 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
Trump Supporters Channel 🇺🇸 @TrumpChannel · 134,619 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 August 2026
Turning Point USA @TPUSA · 47,158 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 August 2026
Fearless Report @FearlessReport · 96,431 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 16 August 2026
Mark Levin Warroom @MarkRLevin · 39,260 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 August 2026
Tucker Carlson Fanbase @TuckerFans · 105,447 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 August 2026
Fighting The Commies @FightingTheCommies · 23,267 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 September 2026
Mike Pompeo @MichaelRPompeo · 24,669 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 15 September 2026
The American Spectator @AmericanSpectator · 43,073 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 August 2026
Sarah Huckabee Sanders @SarahHuckabee · 24,122 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 16 September 2026
The Federalist @FDRLSTT · 24,519 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 September 2026
The Babylon Bee @TheBabylonBee · 95,276 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 16 August 2026
Josh Hawley @Josh_Hawley · 26,289 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 12 September 2026
Project Veritas @project_veritas · 206,484 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
Ted Cruz @TedCruzTX · 28,337 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 23 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ben Shapiro Gang” (@BenShapiroGang), 53,619 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BenShapiroGang.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.