Channel
@amitsegal
On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cross-platform identity · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
368,705subscribers
-2,436 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001158360927 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @amitsegal |
| Description | 24/6 |
| Created | 14 February 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/amitsegal |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 21:19 | 368,705 | +56 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 15:40 | 368,649 | -105 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 20:16 | 368,754 | -122 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 05:56 | 368,876 | +49 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 02:18 | 368,827 | -161 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 22:37 | 368,988 | -173 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 08:37 | 369,161 | -94 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 20:58 | 369,255 | -27 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:54 | 369,282 | -43 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:05 | 369,325 | -71 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:28 | 369,396 | -79 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:37 | 369,475 | -95 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 369,570 | -55 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 369,625 | -56 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:38 | 369,681 | -54 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:54 | 369,735 | -100 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:54 | 369,835 | -133 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 23:26 | 369,968 | -257 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 05:17 | 370,225 | -242 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:52 | 370,467 | first reading |
1,020 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 93 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,020 (5 August 2026 – 19 September 2026) |
| Views total | 45,434,800 |
| Reactions total | 1,267,266 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 20 Sept 2026, 05:57 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 199 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,791,661 reactions across 985 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 631,279 | 35.2% | |
| 👎 | 454,237 | 25.4% | |
| 😁 | 380,753 | 21.3% | |
| custom 5780596797219016124 | 270,393 | 15.1% | |
| 😢 | 46,334 | 2.59% | |
| custom 5780829794899858599 | 8,665 | 0.484% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 985 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,791,661 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 6 August 2026 to 19 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @amitsegal. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 6 August 2026 to 19 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
לפני שנה בערב יום הכיפורים עמדו בכותל 100,000 איש והתפללו לשחרור החטופים הערב עמדו שם אלקנה בוחבוט ורום ברסלבסקי יחד עם עוד 100,000 ישראלים 🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱
custom 57805967972190161243,400👍268👎16😁12custom 57808297948998585999
נתניהו בכותל
custom 57805967972190161242,590👎420👍285😁28custom 57808297948998585997😢6
איחוד האמירויות קובע: הפרסום ש-MBZ שוחח עם נתניהו אינו נכון. בכותרת המשנה נכתב שהתגובה ״מפריכה״ את הפרסום
👍2,720😁159custom 578059679721901612484👎46custom 57808297948998585998
ברייקינג: איחוד האמירויות מכחישה רשמית ששליט המדינה שוחח עם נתניהו והעביר לו אזהרות. ״ענייני ביטחון נדונים בדרגים הרלוונטיים ולא בדרג המנהיגים״ נכתב באתר חדשות רשמי של מדינה מטעם בכיר אמירתי.
👍3,030custom 5780596797219016124155😁134👎60custom 57808297948998585997
תכף יום הכיפורים, ויש לי בקשה אחת מהלב🙏 השנה, תעשו את פדיון הכפרות שלכם לזכרו של הבן שלי סמ"ר יעד בן יעקב הי"ד. התמיכה שלכם מגיעה ישירות למשפחות עניות חסרות כל. יעד שלי, לוחם בגדוד 13 של גולני, נפל בקרב במוצב נחל עוז ב 7 באוקטובר, כשהוא רק בן 20. הוא היה כולו לב ונתינה. תמיד ראה את מי שמולו, דאג לאחרים והיה שם בשביל מי שהיה צריך עזרה. למרות שהיה הכי צעיר בבית, הוא היה עמוד התווך של המשפחה. אני מתגעגעת אליו בכל יום, ו…
custom 5780596797219016124822👍85😢52custom 578082979489985859910😁2
טיבי מבהיר - נלך רחוק יותר מאי פעם כדי להחליף את נתניהו, ואמיר אוחנה זה רק ההתחלה
👎2,030😁168👍116custom 578059679721901612420😢15custom 57808297948998585992
זאת, בניגוד לעמדת הצבא
👍2,190👎278custom 578059679721901612479😁36😢20custom 57808297948998585992
ערב יום הכיפורים, נשיא המדינה יצחק הרצוג החליט להיעתר לבקשתו של אלאור אזריה ולמחוק את יתרת תקופת הרישום הפלילי, ולאפשר לו להמשיך בחייו. לאחר שנים ארוכות שבהן נשא אזריה בתוצאות מעשיו, סבור הנשיא כי מכלול הנסיבות, חלוף הזמן והצער שהביע מצדיקים לאפשר לו לפתוח דף חדש בחייו. החלטה זו התקבלה גם ברוח הימים הללו ומתוך אמונה בחשיבותם של תיקון, פיוס והיכולת להמשיך קדימה. נשיא המדינה חתם הערב, מוצאי שבת, ח' בתשרי, 19 בספטמבר,…
👍3,630custom 5780596797219016124252👎241😁17😢10custom 57808297948998585992
ליברמן לפגוש את העיתונות: איזנקוט מנסה לדאוג לעצמו על חשבון הגוש. אני דואג שהוא יהיה בני גנץ 2. אני אומר לו, לא צריך להיכנס ללחץ ופאניקה בגלל סקר אחד.
😁1,480👎81👍73custom 578059679721901612419custom 57808297948998585993😢1
הליכוד: פצצה תקשורתית- אחמד טיבי חושף הערב את התכנית של איזנקוט, ליברמן ויאיר גולן להקים ממשלת שמאל עם המפלגות הערביות ואומר ״בלי המפלגות הערביות אי אפשר להחליף את הממשלה, נחליף את יו״ר הכנסת מיד אחרי הבחירות״. קול לאיזנקוט וליברמן, ומפתחות המדינה בידי אחמד טיבי ומנסור עבאס.
👍2,610👎236custom 5780596797219016124148😁104😢30custom 57808297948998585996
אחמד טיבי ל״פגוש את העיתונות״: נחליף את יו״ר הכנסת יחד עם גוש איזנקוט, נמליץ על מועמד הגוש ונעשה גם יותר מהמלצה כדי להחליף את ממשלת נתניהו. ״בלי המפלגות הערביות לא ניתן להחליף את הממשלה״, הוסיף.
😁1,970👎517👍107custom 578059679721901612434😢26custom 57808297948998585995
שני לוחמים נפצעו קל ממטען בדרום לבנון, צה״ל תקף בתגובה מטרות חיזבאללה שני מחבלים חוסלו בעזה
custom 57805967972190161241,090😢152👎25👍10😁7custom 57808297948998585995
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,020 posts we hold for @amitsegal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
מה הידיעה הכי ויראלית פה ביממה האחרונה
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 6 August 2026 to 19 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 68 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 27 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 176 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
2 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | Amit Segal |
|---|---|
| Description | Israeli journalist |
| X / Twitter | @amit_segal |
| YouTube | UCodPVg2MpjNdCKd6Zrv78Jg |
| Official site | http://www.amitsegal.co.il |
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
5 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“עמית סגל” (@amitsegal), 368,705 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/amitsegal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.