Channel
@amitsegal
On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cross-platform identity · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
372,815subscribers
+1,674 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001158360927 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @amitsegal |
| Created | 14 February 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 61 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/amitsegal |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 07:10 | 372,815 | -64 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 03:09 | 372,879 | -26 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 00:29 | 372,905 | -3 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 23:00 | 372,908 | -62 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 20:54 | 372,970 | -36 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 00:05 | 373,006 | -38 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 02:51 | 373,044 | +228 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 03:07 | 372,816 | +990 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 03:57 | 371,826 | +2,237 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 02:56 | 369,589 | +737 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 05:00 | 368,852 | +63 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 06:06 | 368,789 | -14 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 02:29 | 368,803 | +3 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 00:20 | 368,800 | -62 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 23:46 | 368,862 | -2 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 19:51 | 368,864 | -16 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 15:45 | 368,880 | -58 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 17:46 | 368,938 | -5 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 15:56 | 368,943 | -35 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 13:37 | 368,978 | first reading |
2,235 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 185 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 2,235 (5 August 2026 – 4 November 2026) |
| Views total | 61,168,520 |
| Reactions total | 1,848,282 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 02:41 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 225 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,186,691 reactions across 988 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 749,415 | 34.3% | |
| 👎 | 643,545 | 29.4% | |
| 😁 | 440,011 | 20.1% | |
| custom 5780596797219016124 | 237,939 | 10.9% | |
| 😢 | 114,382 | 5.23% | |
| custom 5780829794899858599 | 1,399 | 0.064% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 988 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,186,691 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 30 September 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @amitsegal. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 30 September 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 100 of 851 posts held from the last 30 days (11.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
ראש הממשלה בנימין נתניהו: ממשלה התלויה במפלגות תומכי טרור, לא תוכל להתמודד עם אתגר האסלאם הקיצוני שמאיים עלינו מבפנים ומבחוץ. רק ממשלה לאומית רחבה בראשות הליכוד ובהנהגתי, שתכלול את כל מרכיבי הגוש הלאומי ואת כל המפלגות הציוניות שירצו להצטרף – תוכל להתמודד עם האתגר הזה.
👍3,790👎747custom 5780596797219016124158😁136😢5
פייגלין ממליץ על נתניהו 12-7 לנתניהו
👍1,970custom 5780596797219016124148👎130😁76
טראמפ מגיב לוואנס: "ההפסד בבחירות הוא בגלל המלחמה נגד אירן - אבל אסור לתת לאירן להחזיק בנשק גרעיני, ואין לנו ברירה אחרת"
👍3,910custom 5780596797219016124228😁56😢7👎5
זו הפעם הראשונה מזה עשרים שנה שיהדות התורה לא ממליצה על נתניהו
👎2,410👍454😁98😢51custom 578059679721901612435
הדיווח המלא
😢874👎115👍38custom 578059679721901612430😁20
הטענה: בבחירות קיבלנו מהשטח אישוש למידע שהגיע מלמעלה
👍1,980😁53😢33👎31custom 578059679721901612420
מדוע אמר ביום הבחירות שהכל כשורה?
👍1,950😁61👎40😢37custom 578059679721901612425
הזעם על היועמשית
👍2,430😁57👎35😢34custom 578059679721901612424
ראש השבכ: היקף הפרשה - מאה מיליון שקל
👍2,400😢282👎67custom 578059679721901612434😁33
5 מ-7 חברי יהדות התורה יימנעו מהמלצה, פרוש ושטארק עדיין שוקלים להמליץ על נתניהו
👍809👎254😁78custom 578059679721901612442😢8
יו״ר ש״ס הרב אריה דרעי בהודעה: כל ימי חיי גדלתי וחונכתי על הציות לדעת תורה, וכך פעלתי לאורך כל שנות עשייתי הציבורית, ואף חינכנו דורות שלמים בדרך זו. משכך, כאשר קיבלתי היום את הוראתם המוחלטת של מרנן ורבנן מועצת חכמי התורה שליט״א, הריני מקבל אותה ללא הרהור וללא פקפוק, ומודה למרנן ורבנן על האמון והתמיכה שהם מעניקים לי לאורך כל הדרך. מחר אי״ה אזמן לישיבת סיעה את חברי הכנסת של התנועה ואת נציגינו הבכירים ברשויות המקומיו…
😁1,460👍372👎204custom 578059679721901612432😢6
ישראל ביתנו המליצה על איזנקוט 11-7 לנתניהו עד עתה (כמובן יתהפך בהמשך)
😁869👎284👍103custom 578059679721901612433😢19
Showing the 12 most recent of 2,235 posts we hold for @amitsegal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
@amitsegal edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 1 post on @amitsegal as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
אז איך ייגמרו הבחירות
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
איזה עימות תרצו לראות
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 30 September 2026 to 4 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 79 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 32 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 195 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
2 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | Amit Segal |
|---|---|
| Description | Israeli journalist |
| X / Twitter | @amit_segal |
| YouTube | UCodPVg2MpjNdCKd6Zrv78Jg |
| Official site | http://www.amitsegal.co.il |
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
5 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“עמית סגל” (@amitsegal), 372,815 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/amitsegal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.