Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for נועם אמיר

Channel

נועם אמיר

@noamamir

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

20,563subscribers

-100 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002001797370
TypeChannel
Username@noamamir
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/noamamir

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

20,56220,66420,6136 August 2026 — 20,663 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,663 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,664 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,663 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,648 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,647 subscribers13 August 2026 — 20,641 subscribers14 August 2026 — 20,642 subscribers15 August 2026 — 20,645 subscribers17 August 2026 — 20,646 subscribers18 August 2026 — 20,643 subscribers19 August 2026 — 20,638 subscribers20 August 2026 — 20,632 subscribers21 August 2026 — 20,627 subscribers23 August 2026 — 20,620 subscribers24 August 2026 — 20,609 subscribers25 August 2026 — 20,603 subscribers26 August 2026 — 20,601 subscribers27 August 2026 — 20,594 subscribers30 August 2026 — 20,590 subscribers31 August 2026 — 20,581 subscribers1 September 2026 — 20,578 subscribers2 September 2026 — 20,577 subscribers3 September 2026 — 20,563 subscribers5 September 2026 — 20,562 subscribers8 September 2026 — 20,578 subscribers11 September 2026 — 20,575 subscribers13 September 2026 — 20,572 subscribers14 September 2026 — 20,576 subscribers16 September 2026 — 20,570 subscribers19 September 2026 — 20,563 subscribers20,5636 August 202619 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 43 days, net -100. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,547–20,679 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 03:0120,563-7
16 Sept 2026, 20:1920,570-6
14 Sept 2026, 22:1920,576+4
13 Sept 2026, 07:5720,572-3
11 Sept 2026, 10:1620,575-3
8 Sept 2026, 16:2120,578+16
5 Sept 2026, 07:5620,562-1
3 Sept 2026, 11:0020,563-14
2 Sept 2026, 03:3220,577-1
1 Sept 2026, 07:0620,578-3
31 Aug 2026, 09:3720,581-9
30 Aug 2026, 10:0420,590-4
27 Aug 2026, 11:5520,594-7
26 Aug 2026, 15:2420,601-2
25 Aug 2026, 17:1620,603-6
24 Aug 2026, 15:5920,609-11
23 Aug 2026, 03:0520,620-7
21 Aug 2026, 13:5620,627-5
20 Aug 2026, 10:5220,632-6
19 Aug 2026, 07:1320,638first reading

Engagement

211 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.6%
avg views ÷ 20,563 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,440
98 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
98
of 211 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held211 (5 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total434,780
Reactions total18,830
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 00:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 15m
Average length
1m 09s

Measured directly from 66 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

40,713 reactions across 211 posts, in 37 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍9,42623.2%
🔥4,53911.1%
4,50111.1%
🤮4,25310.4%
😁2,7886.85%
🤬2,6246.45%
custom 57805967972190161242,0695.08%
custom 59875494699592651701,3073.21%
👏1,3043.20%
👌1,2973.19%
😡9922.44%
👎7731.90%
💔7601.87%
😢6481.59%
custom 52153995408147810356061.49%
🙏5811.43%
💊5721.40%
🤔4241.04%
😱3620.889%
🤨3060.752%
17 further kinds5811.43%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 211 of the 211 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40,713 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 211 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 211 we hold a reading for · 0.9%
Most on one post
8
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @noamamir. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 211 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 18:47 UTC≈2,560 views104 reactionsread 3 September 2026

חכו עם התדלוקים של הרכב. תוך יומיים הדלק יוזל משמעותית. נועם אמיר ערוץ 14 טלגרם | וואטסאפ | אינסטגרם | פייסבוק | טיקטוק

👍79🙏18😁41🔥1🤝1

2 Sept 2026, 17:39 UTC≈3,210 views81 reactionsread 3 September 2026

‏פרסמנו במהדורה | אמש במערכת הביטחון הגבירו דריכות משמעותית בעקבות התרעה שנכנסה בעקבות פעילות התקפית אפשרית של החמאס נגד כוחותינו ברצועה. ‏המערכת נדרכה, אך האירוע שתוכנן לא יצא אל הפועל. הלל ביטון רוזן ✍🏻 נועם אמיר ערוץ 14 טלגרם | וואטסאפ | אינסטגרם | פייסבוק | טיקטוק

👍64🙏12🤬2🤨1😁1😨1

2 Sept 2026, 14:56 UTC≈5,090 views254 reactionsread 3 September 2026

אגב הכחשה של הרמטכ״ל על זה שהוא פוצץ לפצרי״ת המודחת את חשבון הבנק במליונים - אין. נועם אמיר ערוץ 14 טלגרם | וואטסאפ | אינסטגרם | פייסבוק | טיקטוק

🤬190🤮50👍122

2 Sept 2026, 14:48 UTC≈4,990 views139 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

בינתיים הרב הראשי האשכנזי במכתב לשר הביטחון כ"ץ ולרמטכ״ל לזמיר: ״בטלו את העמדתם לדין של חיילי גבעתי שסירבו לעלות לנמ"ר עם פראמדיקית״ עכשיו לפחות הרמטכ״ל לא יוכל לטעון שזה לא הוא זה המפקדים בגבעתי בואו נראה מה יעשה הימור שלי, יגלגל את הרב הראשי מכל המדרגות. נועם אמיר ערוץ 14 טלגרם | וואטסאפ | אינסטגרם | פייסבוק | טיקטוק

👍124🤔15

2 Sept 2026, 14:44 UTC≈4,720 views153 reactionsread 3 September 2026

הינה התגובה המלאה היי נועם ראינו שעלית עם זה שהרמטכ״ל לקח חלק בהחמרת הענישה של החיילים מצרפים לך את התגובה שלנו, תגובת דובר צה״ל: מדובר בשקר מוחלט. הרמטכ״ל לא התערב בהחלטות המפקדים בעניין הענישה ועל כן גם לא נתן כל הנחיה להחמיר בענישתם של הלוחמים. ההחלטות התקבלו על-ידי המפקדים, בהתאם לנסיבות האירוע, וזוכות לגיבוי מלא מהרמטכ״ל. הניסיון לייחס לרמטכ״ל הנחיה שלא ניתנה הוא חסר בסיס ובזוי. נועם אמיר ערוץ 14 טלגרם | ווא

👎79🤮50custom 598754946995926517015🤔42🤬2💊1

2 Sept 2026, 14:43 UTC≈4,660 views115 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

בדובר צה״ל מגיבים לדברים של סמוטריץ וטוענים שסמוטריץ משקר נועם אמיר ערוץ 14 טלגרם | וואטסאפ | אינסטגרם | פייסבוק | טיקטוק

🤮93🤬14💊6😱2

2 Sept 2026, 10:39 UTC≈4,250 views404 reactionsread 3 September 2026

רמטכ״ל בושה וחרפה!!!!

🤮311😡64👍17👌7custom 57805967972190161243💊1custom 52153995408147810351

2 Sept 2026, 10:39 UTC≈4,390 views275 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

‏סמוטריץ' חושף: "כל הגורמים בחטיבת גבעתי רצו לסגור את הפרשה - הייתה הנחיה של הרמטכ"ל לעונש חמור" ‏השר בצלאל סמוטריץ' לפתחי וזמרי בעם בעקבות מעצר לוחמי גבעתי שסירבו לשהות בנגמ"ש עם פרמדיקית: "אני אתן לכם סקופ, מקווה שלא יכעסו עליי. אני אומר לכם שכל הגורמים בתוך חטיבת גבעתי רצו לסגור את הפרשייה... הם הבינו שמדובר בלוחמים טובים. לצערי הרב הייתה הנחיה של מישהו למעלה במטה הכללי... שאמר: אנחנו רוצים פה ענישה חמורה" ‏זמרי

🤬2617custom 57805967972190161243💊2😡2

2 Sept 2026, 09:27 UTC≈4,240 views81 reactionsread 3 September 2026

הודעה משותפת לדוברות המשטרה ודוברות שב"כ: בתום חקירה של שוטרי המחוז הצפוני ושירות הביטחון הכללי, כתב אישום הוגש נגד תושב הצפון שהזדהה עם ארגון הטרור דאע״ש ואף קיים אימונים במטרה להצטרף ללחימה בשורות דאע״ש בחו״ל בפעילות משותפת של היחידה המרכזית של מרחב גליל במשטרת מחוז צפון ושירות הבטחון הכללי, במהלך השבועות האחרונים, נעצר לחקירה ח׳מיס סואעד, בשנות ה-30 לחייו, תושב חוסנייה שבגליל. חקירתו בשב״כ ובימ"ר גליל העלתה כי ה

🔥49🤮14👍11😡52

2 Sept 2026, 07:01 UTC≈4,310 views148 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

צה"ל חיסל את המחבל טלאל מוצטפא צאלח בדוי, מפקד במחלקת הביטחון הצבאי בחטיבת העיר עזה של ארגון הטרור חמאס. בנוסף, בתקיפה חוסל מומו סעיד מחמד הוארי, מחבל בארגון הטרור חמאס. נועם אמיר ערוץ 14 טלגרם | וואטסאפ | אינסטגרם | פייסבוק | טיקטוק

74🔥55👍12😁3🏆2👏2

1 Sept 2026, 20:04 UTC≈4,960 views142 reactionsread 3 September 2026

דיווחים על תקיפות אמריקאיות בטהרן רויטרס: לפחות 4 הרוגים ומעל ל-30 פצועים קשה כתוצאה מתקיפות ארה״ב בדרום איראן נועם אמיר ערוץ 14 טלגרם | וואטסאפ | אינסטגרם | פייסבוק | טיקטוק

🔥131😁6🤔5

1 Sept 2026, 19:56 UTC≈4,940 views66 reactionsread 3 September 2026

בירדן כן הופעלו אזעקות. נועם אמיר ערוץ 14 טלגרם | וואטסאפ | אינסטגרם | פייסבוק | טיקטוק

👍51😁8😱4🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 211 posts we hold for @noamamir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

תמיר מורג
@tamirmorag14 · 33,216
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 4 September 2026
יאיר אלטמן - הערוץ הרשמי 🇮🇱
@Yair_Altman_channel14 · 31,631
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 5 September 2026
זיו רובינשטיין - עד שהמלחמה תסתיים
@ziv710 · 41,795
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 29 August 2026
הלל ביטון רוזן
@HallelBittonRosen · 35,146
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 2 September 2026
מוטי קסטל - Moti Kastel
@kastelmoti14 · 28,012
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 September 2026
אור פיאלקוב
@orfialkov · 33,886
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 3 September 2026
גדי טאוב: שומר סף
@shomersaf · 28,140
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 September 2026
יגאל מלכה - igal malka
@igal_malka · 31,451
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 6 September 2026
פיד ימין - The Right Way
@FidYamin · 32,668
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 5 September 2026
פיקוד העורף - צפון
@PikudHaOref_3 · 26,152
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 September 2026
חדשות היום - הערוץ הרשמי
@HayomIL · 108,718
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 August 2026
אבישי גרינצייג - עדכונים
@grinzaig · 26,721
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 September 2026
יותם זמרי
@Yotamzimritelegram · 75,487
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
ארז תדמור
@Erez_Tadmor · 23,423
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 September 2026
שטח אש 🔥 בטלגרם
@Hidcunim_news · 24,666
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 September 2026
פיקוד העורף
@PikudHaOref_all · 209,056
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
יבגני זרובינסקי
@ivgiz · 23,987
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 17 September 2026
חברי כנסת מצייצים 🎗
@IsraelKnesset · 24,249
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 16 September 2026
12 פינת 99 - יניר קוזין וירון אברהם
@yaronyanir1299 · 44,914
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 27 August 2026
M.B iNSIDER-מ.ב דיווחים בארץ בטלגרם
@MBSRsi98 · 62,907
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 23 August 2026
מיכאל שמש
@MichaelShemesh · 25,243
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 September 2026
איתמר בן גביר
@bengvir · 27,016
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 September 2026
בן-ציון מקלס - גיאו-אנליסט
@BenTzionM · 26,046
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 September 2026
יוסף חדאד - Yoseph Haddad
@yosephhaddad · 50,815
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 43 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“נועם אמיר” (@noamamir), 20,563 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/noamamir.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.