National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
38 measurements spanning 68 days, net -167. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35,105–35,375 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 38
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Oct 2026, 09:11
35,173
+2
9 Oct 2026, 04:41
35,171
+24
4 Oct 2026, 15:21
35,147
+11
26 Sept 2026, 09:41
35,136
-10
19 Sept 2026, 12:02
35,146
-13
17 Sept 2026, 02:59
35,159
-16
15 Sept 2026, 03:58
35,175
-8
13 Sept 2026, 11:18
35,183
-3
11 Sept 2026, 16:16
35,186
+5
9 Sept 2026, 05:39
35,181
-3
5 Sept 2026, 21:57
35,184
-4
3 Sept 2026, 22:19
35,188
-7
2 Sept 2026, 12:23
35,195
-15
1 Sept 2026, 08:54
35,210
-4
31 Aug 2026, 11:47
35,214
-4
30 Aug 2026, 12:14
35,218
-5
29 Aug 2026, 12:57
35,223
-4
28 Aug 2026, 10:12
35,227
-8
27 Aug 2026, 09:06
35,235
-8
26 Aug 2026, 05:43
35,243
first reading
Engagement
261 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 121 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
26.4%
avg views ÷ 35,173 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,270
117 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.83%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
117
of 261 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 October 2026
Posts held
261 (31 July 2026 – 13 October 2026)
Views total
1,084,670
Reactions total
19,796
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Oct 2026, 20:56 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈418
Videos
≈475
Links
≈4,300
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
47m 47s
Average length
57s
Measured directly from 50 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
47,008 reactions across 261 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
16,795
35.7%
❤
13,014
27.7%
😢
6,083
12.9%
👏
5,957
12.7%
👎
5,159
11.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 261 of the 261 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47,008 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 261 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 13 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
פרסמנו במהדורה | הסוף לגיבוש הצנחנים.
בזרוע היבשה בצה״ל מתקיימת בימים אלו עבודה מטה שבבסיסה ביטול הגיבוש המסורתי לחטיבה האדומה, לאחר עשרות שנים בהן נחשבה לחטיבה ממיינת.
בבסיס ההחלטה - הישגים וציונים בבחינות שבוצעו בזרוע, שהציגו נתונים נמוכים או זהים ממקבילותיה בתקופת המלחמה.
בנוסף, הרצון להפוך את הצנחנים לחטיבה שנלחמת על כח אדם איכותי כמו שאר חטיבות החי״ר, השפיע על ההחלטה, שכפופה לאישור סופי של הרמטכ״ל וצפויה לצאת לפ…
פרסמנו במהדורה | בכירים במערכת הביטחון מעידים כי בתקופה האחרונה אייל זמיר פועל נמרצות לקדם את אורי גורדין לתפקיד סגן הרמטכ״ל.
במסגרת הקמפיין, לפי עדויות של קצינים בקרייה גורדין קיבל משרד במתחם סמוך ללשכת זמיר, יושב לידו בישיבות חשובות, וכן מקבל סמכויות שחלקן בעבר היו של הסגן הנוכחי תמיר ידעי.
זאת ועוד, זמיר שמכיר היטב את עמדת הדרג המדיני ורצונו לראות בתפקיד הסגן בעתיד את יניב עשור, לפי עדויות בישיבות סגורות לא אחת הט…
הלל מה המצב?
צריך את עזרתך להציל חבר קרוב ..
יצאנו בקמפיין גיוס המונים להצלת שון יניב.
שון מתמודד עם סרטן מוח אלים ומסוכן שהתגלה לפני 4 חודשים. אחרי ניתוח מורכב, טיפולי כימותרפיה והקרנות שעבר, התברר שהסרטן הוא אלים יותר ממה שחשבו. שון חייב עכשיו טיפול חדשני, שלא קיים בארץ, שמותאם באופן ספציפי לגידול שיש לו- זה הסיכוי היחיד שלו לנצח!
צריך את העזרה שלך, לשון יש 3 ילדים קטנים.. חבר, משלנו !
אשלח לך את כל מה שצריך, תמונה…
האסון ברכס רמים: מעבר לתחקיר הנוקב והנדרש של משרד החינוך וצה״ל, האשמה בראש ובראשונה היא על מי ששיגר את המצרר.
כשאותם מחבלים ביצעו את הירי הם תכננו שמה שקרה מוקדם יותר יקרה - ילדים ימותו ויפצעו, אל לנו לשכוח זאת לרגע אחד.
הלל ביטון רוזן
האירוע ברכס רמים: לפי ההערכות הראשוניות פריט האמל״ח שהתפוצץ ככל הנראה היא פצצת מצרר ששוגרה לשטח ישראל במהלך המלחמה.
הלל ביטון רוזן בטלגרם
https://t.me/HallelBittonRosen
האסון ברכס רמים: מחקירה ראשונית של גורמי הביטחון בשטח עולה, כי אחד התלמידים הכניס פריט אמל״ח לתיקו, שלאחר מכן התפוצץ כשהתלמידים שהו סמוך לכביש.
הלל ביטון רוזן בטלגרם
https://t.me/HallelBittonRosen
הפיצוץ ברכס רמים: בעיריית מעלות מעדכנים שמדובר על תלמידים וצוות חינוכי של המוסד החינוכי אורט בעיר.
הלל ביטון רוזן בטלגרם
https://t.me/HallelBittonRosen
בהמשך לאירוע ברכס רמים: עדכון פצועים - 4 מחוסרי הכרה, ועוד 4 בהכרה בדרגות שונות.
הלל ביטון רוזן בטלגרם
https://t.me/HallelBittonRosen
😢110❤2👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 261 posts we hold for @HallelBittonRosen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
נועם אמיר @noamamir · 20,531 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 September 2026
אלמוג בוקר עדכונים @almogboker78 · 60,260 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 22 August 2026
זיו רובינשטיין - עד שהמלחמה תסתיים @ziv710 · 41,748 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 29 August 2026
קבינט מדיני ביטחוני - מוריה אסרף & דורון קדוש @moriahdoron · 47,108 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 26 August 2026
יותם זמרי @Yotamzimritelegram · 75,232 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
צה״ל - הערוץ הרשמי @idf_telegram · 95,600 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 August 2026
עמיחי שטיין | הערוץ המדיני @US2020US · 22,210 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 21 September 2026
חדשות בטחון מהשטח ללא צנזורה @lelotsenzura · 84,740 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
אסף רוזנצוייג, חדשות מהעולם הגדול @asafroz · 21,639 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 September 2026
מיכאל שמש @MichaelShemesh · 25,496 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 September 2026
עמית סגל @amitsegal · 369,156 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
יבגני זרובינסקי @ivgiz · 24,109 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 17 September 2026
12 פינת 99 - יניר קוזין וירון אברהם @yaronyanir1299 · 44,610 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 27 August 2026
ארז תדמור @Erez_Tadmor · 23,382 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 September 2026
N12 צ'אט הכתבים @N12chat · 51,308 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 25 August 2026
אח'בר אלעאלם אלערבי أخبار من العالم العربي @AlealamAlearabiuEranMalca · 19,727 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 1 October 2026
אינטליניוז | חדשות המזרח התיכון | Intellinews @Intellinews · 30,488 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 6 September 2026
דפנה ליאל @lieldaphna · 56,636 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
אבו צאלח הדסק הערבי @salehdesk1 · 188,850 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 11 August 2026
הימין הלא מתנצל של הצל @TheBigBadShadow · 291,994 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
ישראל היום @israelhayomofficial · 52,603 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 24 August 2026
חדשות אונליין @newsonlineils · 70,993 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 20 August 2026
ידידיה אפשטיין / חדשות מהרגע בטלגרם 🇮🇱 @yedidya_epshteyn · 85,645 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 104 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“הלל ביטון רוזן” (@HallelBittonRosen), 35,173 subscribers as measured 13 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HallelBittonRosen.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.