Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for סניה ולדברג

Channel

סניה ולדברג

@SeniaWaldberg

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,798subscribers

-68 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001489913447
TypeChannel
Username@SeniaWaldberg
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/SeniaWaldberg

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

10,79810,86910,833.57 August 2026 — 10,866 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,866 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,869 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,867 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,866 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,864 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,865 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,862 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,860 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,857 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,852 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,851 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,846 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,844 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,840 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,835 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,833 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,835 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,834 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,829 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,830 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,834 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,831 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,830 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,826 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,825 subscribers8 September 2026 — 10,814 subscribers11 September 2026 — 10,811 subscribers12 September 2026 — 10,803 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,799 subscribers18 September 2026 — 10,798 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 42 days, net -68. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,787–10,880 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 09:3610,798-1
14 Sept 2026, 11:5610,799-4
12 Sept 2026, 20:3810,803-8
11 Sept 2026, 00:3510,811-3
8 Sept 2026, 01:5910,814-11
4 Sept 2026, 22:5710,825-1
3 Sept 2026, 09:3310,826-4
2 Sept 2026, 03:5810,830-1
1 Sept 2026, 05:1710,831-3
31 Aug 2026, 07:4310,834+4
30 Aug 2026, 05:0310,830+1
29 Aug 2026, 03:5410,829-5
28 Aug 2026, 03:2510,834-1
27 Aug 2026, 03:1710,835+2
26 Aug 2026, 04:1210,833-2
25 Aug 2026, 01:1410,835-5
23 Aug 2026, 15:4410,840-4
21 Aug 2026, 23:5510,844-2
20 Aug 2026, 17:1210,846-5
19 Aug 2026, 16:4210,851first reading

Engagement

114 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.7%
avg views ÷ 10,798 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,990
38 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.77%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
38
of 114 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held114 (3 August 20261 September 2026)
Views total113,530
Reactions total2,004
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Sept 2026, 20:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
20m 27s
Average length
49s

Measured directly from 25 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

6,984 reactions across 114 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,68024.1%
🤣1,42920.5%
🤡1,04114.9%
🔥93713.4%
5708.16%
👏4977.12%
💯2123.04%
😱1862.66%
👎1161.66%
😭871.25%
🖕590.845%
🤷‍♂550.788%
🥰340.487%
🍾330.473%
🤯240.344%
😍190.272%
💔50.072%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 114 of the 114 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,984 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 114 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 18:23 UTC≈1,650 views29 reactionsread 1 September 2026

שמח הלילה במזרח התיכון

🤣28👍1

1 Sept 2026, 18:23 UTC≈1,330 views24 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @abualiexpressPhoto

דובר משמרות המהפכה האיראנים : "עונש כבד מצפה לתוקפים, וארצות הברית עוד תתחרט על התקיפות החדשות שביצעה." ## סוכנות הידיעות האיראנית תסנים המזוהה עם משמרות המהפכה האיראנים מפי מקור צבאי בכיר: "הכוחות המזוינים של איראן יגיבו בוודאות על התקיפות שביצעו האמריקנים הערב במספר מוקדים במדינה. התגובה תהיה בעוצמה גדולה פי כמה מהתקיפות האמריקאיות." כדי להגיב לכתבה לחצו כאן

🤡24

1 Sept 2026, 18:23 UTC≈1,500 views14 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @arabworld301news

טראמפ לפוקס ניוז: ״איראן תחדל מלהתקיים אם תגיב לתקיפותינו״. יאיר גולדבלט - ביטחון ומזרח תיכון | ביטחון ומזרח תיכון ב-X

👍10🤣4

1 Sept 2026, 18:23 UTC≈1,520 views10 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @bitahoninthemiddleeast

טראמפ, שומע? באיראן מדווחים על שיגורים ממספרים מרחבים לעבר מדינות המפרץ. יאיר גולדבלט - ביטחון ומזרח תיכון | ביטחון ומזרח תיכון ב-X

👍10

1 Sept 2026, 18:21 UTC≈1,560 views26 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @arabworld301news

טראמפ מסביר את הסיבה לפיה התגובה האמריקאית התעכבה: ״הם ניסו לבנות מחדש את המכ"מים שלהם כי הם לא יכולים לראות כלום. חיכינו עד שהוא כמעט נבנה ואז תקפנו אותו." יאיר גולדבלט - ביטחון ומזרח תיכון | ביטחון ומזרח תיכון ב-X

🤣18🔥7👍1

1 Sept 2026, 06:36 UTC≈2,490 views70 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @alexmehacarmel

הבית הלבן מפרסם את פרטי עסקת הנפט בין ארה״ב לוונצואלה: 17 שדות נפט יועברו לזיכיונות של 100 שנה לחברה אמריקאית הבית הלבן פרסם את פרטי עסקת הנפט בין ארה״ב לוונצואלה, במסגרתה העניקה ונצואלה ל־North American Blue Energy Partners (NABEP) זיכיונות ל־100 שנה להפעלת 17 שדות נפט במדינה. עיקרי ההסכם: 1. 17 שדות הנפט כוללים כ־65 מיליארד חביות של עתודות נפט מוכחות. 2. ממשלת ארה״ב תקבל 35% ממניות חברת האם של NABEP, ללא עלות ל

👍4219👏9

31 Aug 2026, 19:09 UTC≈3,060 views27 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @News_il_h

אקסיוס: טראמפ שוקל לבצע תקיפות מוגבלות במצר הורמוז. התוכנית שלו היא למנוע מאיראן להציב שם מכ"מים וטילים שישמשו אותה לתקוף ספינות. ❗️⚠️ללא צנזורה חדשות ישראל: https://t.me/News_il_h ❗️⚠️לקבוצת הוואטסאפ לעדכונים חריגים: https://chat.whatsapp.com/CDg9PzFpew9HAclmjvzNZ6?s=cl&p=a&ilr=4

👍13🤡101🤣1🤯1🤷‍♂1

31 Aug 2026, 15:34 UTC≈1,920 views74 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @amitsegal

טראמפ: נכה חזק באירן בתגובה על השיגורים שלהם הלילה

🤡61🔥8👍3🖕1🤣1

30 Aug 2026, 23:21 UTC≈3,490 views82 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @tamirmorag14

הדיווח בוושינגטון פוסט לפיו מפקדים בכירים התריעו בפני מזכיר המלחמה הגסת' כי חידוש המלחמה באיראן "אינו בר-קיימא" ("unsustainable"), הוא עדות חותכת להמשך קיומו של דיפ-סטייט אמריקני גם תחת ממשל טראמפ. האמת המבצעית היא שארה"ב בהחלט יכולה לחדש את המלחמה באיראן ולנצח בחזיתות אחרות אם יידרש ממנה - אלא שהמחיר יהיה גבוה יותר (כנראה לא באופן דרמטי, אך ניתן להתווכח על ההגדרה הזו). אבל הנקודה החמורה באמת קשורה בהתנהלות הארגוני

👍6616

30 Aug 2026, 23:16 UTC≈3,560 views82 reactionsread 1 September 2026

יופי. תפציצו את קטאר המון

💯70👍82🥰2

30 Aug 2026, 23:16 UTC≈3,340 views29 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @bitahoninthemiddleeast

השיגורים מאיראן נמשכים גם כעת. דיווחים מסוייגים על פיצוצים הנשמעים בקטאר. יאיר גולדבלט - ביטחון ומזרח תיכון | ביטחון ומזרח תיכון ב-X

🔥281

30 Aug 2026, 20:32 UTC≈3,570 views32 reactionsread 1 September 2026

אל תפתחו תקוות סתם. אם יש דיווח על תנועת מטוסים מעל מרכז אוכלוסין, זו לא תקיפה מסיבית בהפתעה. זה כנראה ארוע נקודתי

👍32

Showing the 12 most recent of 114 posts we hold for @SeniaWaldberg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Carmel News - חדשות
@alexmehacarmel · 53,853
14 posts
חדשות 301 העולם הערבי
@arabworld301news · 179,714
14 posts
אבו עלי אקספרס
@abualiexpress · 581,398
10 posts
חדשות בזמן אמת
@Realtimesecurity1 · 144,329
5 posts
יאיר גולדבלט - ביטחון ומזרח תיכון
@bitahoninthemiddleeast · 2,553
5 posts
חדשות איראן
@hadshotiran · 43,080
5 posts
עמית סגל
@amitsegal · 368,705
3 posts
תמיר מורג
@tamirmorag14 · 33,216
3 posts
🔞 חדשות ישראל | ללא צנזורה חדשות ישראל
@News_il_h · 287,763
2 posts
מכ"ם החדשות - ידיעות ראשוניות
@Newsofmakam · 44,252
2 posts
Annabella Tech
@Annabellapump · 740
1 post
אריאל כהנא
@Ariel_Kahana · 10,718
1 post
דור פ. בטלגרם
@Dornewsil · 8,073
1 post
אפוק - מגזין | חדשות | פרשנויות - Epoch
@MagEpoch · 92,179
1 post
N12 צ'אט הכתבים
@N12chat · 51,278
1 post
עומרי חיים عمري حاييم
@OmriHaim · 1,614
1 post
סולימאן & בלומנטל
@SuliandItay · 12,046
1 post
עמיחי שטיין | הערוץ המדיני
@US2020US · 22,155
1 post
יאיר נבות - החזית המזרחית
@YairNavot · 1,893
1 post
כאן 11 | דסק ערבים פלסטינים
@kanarab · 14,240
1 post
רק נטו חדשות בטלגרם
@raknetoooooo · 157,351
1 post
12 פינת 99 - יניר קוזין וירון אברהם
@yaronyanir1299 · 44,914
1 post
יוסי יהושוע - עדכוני צבא וביטחון
@yosiyehoshua · 12,229
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

שוק ההון - השקעות, מסחר ועדכונים TradingIL
@TradingIL · 28,036
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 September 2026
יבגני זרובינסקי
@ivgiz · 23,987
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 17 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“סניה ולדברג” (@SeniaWaldberg), 10,798 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SeniaWaldberg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.