International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
54 measurements spanning 90 days, net -344. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,254–28,855 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 54
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Nov 2026, 11:26
28,420
-2
3 Nov 2026, 14:09
28,422
+21
2 Nov 2026, 14:39
28,401
-6
1 Nov 2026, 12:47
28,407
-15
31 Oct 2026, 15:16
28,422
-14
30 Oct 2026, 16:47
28,436
-5
29 Oct 2026, 14:56
28,441
-4
28 Oct 2026, 11:54
28,445
-10
27 Oct 2026, 10:56
28,455
-7
26 Oct 2026, 12:59
28,462
-13
23 Oct 2026, 12:14
28,475
+1
22 Oct 2026, 13:09
28,474
-6
21 Oct 2026, 08:30
28,480
+7
20 Oct 2026, 05:58
28,473
+36
19 Oct 2026, 05:07
28,437
+19
18 Oct 2026, 01:57
28,418
+95
16 Oct 2026, 23:45
28,323
-1
15 Oct 2026, 00:20
28,324
-13
13 Oct 2026, 20:10
28,337
-28
10 Oct 2026, 04:16
28,365
first reading
Engagement
249 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 145 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.0%
avg views ÷ 28,420 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,690
94 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
95
of 249 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held
249 (28 July 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total
347,322
Reactions total
9,414
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 01:28 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,440
Videos
≈950
Links
≈6,960
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
21m 33s
Average length
1m 26s
Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
30,401 reactions across 247 posts, in 64 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
7,615
25.0%
❤
3,077
10.1%
🙏
3,033
9.98%
💯
2,830
9.31%
🔥
2,312
7.61%
🤔
2,274
7.48%
👀
1,493
4.91%
💔
1,309
4.31%
🤬
954
3.14%
😁
731
2.40%
😢
665
2.19%
😱
630
2.07%
👏
529
1.74%
💩
469
1.54%
🤣
378
1.24%
🤯
309
1.02%
🤮
234
0.77%
👎
223
0.734%
🤡
204
0.671%
😭
189
0.622%
44 further kinds
943
3.10%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 247 of the 249 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30,401 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 249 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
0.402%
1 of 249 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
3,430
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
3,820
over 246 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 249 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 31 of 95 posts held from the last 30 days (32.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
⚡Роман Янушевский:
Партия НДИ на консультациях с президентом Герцогом порекомендовала в качестве следующего премьер-министра Гади Айзенкота.
Сейчас расклад 11 к 7 в пользу Нетаниягу (из 120). Он будет меняться по мере встреч Герцога с партиями, преодолевшими электоральный барьер.
Вопреки обыкновению, президент начал консультации с небольшими партиями, а не самыми крупными.
Подпишись на 9 канал
⚡️Роман Янушевский:
Бал прошел, угасли свечи... Reuters со ссылкой на двух высокопоставленных иранских чиновников сообщает, что все силы безопасности Ирана приведены в максимальную готовность. В Тегеране верят, что Трамп захочет отыграться на Исламской Республике после неудачных для него промежуточных выборов.
И невдомек иранцам, что дело вовсе не в выборах, а в иранской агрессии и недоговороспособности.
Сейчас пе…
ЦИК утвердил результаты выборов и вручил их президенту. Тот их принял и призвал партии сделать так, чтобы Государство Израиль оказалось в выигрыше.
В общем, партиям дан шанс найти выход из политического тупика.
Подпишись на Ближний В.
⚡️Роман Янушевский:
Вчера Дональд Трамп неожиданно для некоторых израильских чиновников объявил о том, что в скором времени прекратит финансовую помощь США Израилю.
По его словам, с таким предложением к нему обратился Биньямин Нетаниягу, и американский президент даже пытался его отговорить. Но затем согласился с аргументами израильского премьера.
Разумеется, это было заявление, призванное повлиять на исход выборов…
📱🇮🇱Израильский пазл:
самое важное без хаоса и кликбейта
В Израиле легко подсесть на эмоциональные качели: до хрипоты спорят о мандатах, потом неделями гадают когда будет война, а в итоге выгорают от бесконечного скроллинга.
Мы собрали папку ТГ-каналов, которые помогают разбираться в происходящем, находить полезную информацию и не тонуть в информационном шуме.
Добавляйте подборку каналов в один клик ⬇️
https://t.me…
Что касается внутренней политики, я намеренно ничего не пишу и не комментирую. Жду, пока осядет пыль.
Думаю, результаты голосования завтра будут утверждены окончательно, а затем большинство партий поддержат кандидатуру Айзенкота.
Подпишись на Ближний В.
⚡️Роман Янушевский:
В США через несколько часов откроются избирательные участки, но голосование, по сути, уже началось несколько дней назад. На этом фоне американские военные нанесли удар по иранским военным позициям на острове Кешм после того, как иранцы обстреляли американские беспилотники и, по иранским сообщениям, даже сбили их.
Началось? Ещё нет. И сомнительно, что начнется именно в день выборов, потому что эт…
⚡️Роман Янушевский:
В США началось голосование на промежуточных выборах. 50,5 млн американцев уже досрочно выразили свою волю.
Послезавтра, 3 ноября, американцы переизбирают весь состав Палаты представителей, часть Сената (35 из 100) и губернаторов 36 штатов.
Позиции республиканцев неизбежно ослабнут, потому что на промежуточных выборах традиционно действующая власть ослабевает.
Судя по многочисленным сливам СМИ,…
А что же больше никто из политиков не названивает? И смски с предвыборными опросами не сыпятся пачками?
Всё, праздник демократии закончился. Ждем следующих выборов. Возможно, уже в следующем году.
Подпишись на Ближний В.
Сейчас во всех эфирах и аналитических разборах обсуждают явку в арабском секторе как некую сенсацию и чуть ли не природную аномалию. Мол, произошло нечто невиданное, перевернувшее израильскую политику. И сразу продолжают, что если бы не деньги и подкуп, то по своей воле они бы никогда не пришли на избирательные участки.
На самом деле — ничего невиданного здесь нет. Достаточно просто поднять историческую статистику.
В…
👍57🤔40👎17❤14💯14🖕1
Showing the 12 most recent of 249 posts we hold for @romanaboutmeast. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@romanaboutmeast edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
15 October 2026
Most recent edit
15 October 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @romanaboutmeast as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
18 October 2026
Most recent seen missing
18 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
17 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@romanaboutmeast named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@maadaneimania named in 8 posts, 12 August 2026 – 3 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Алексей Железнов: ЦАХАЛ/Израиль/Ближний Восток⚔️ @alexavni · 81,762#1
Война и мир на Ближнем Востоке- Дина Лиснянская. @crescentscroissants · 55,070#2
Война с Ордой. Сергей Ауслендер @voinasordoy · 200,337#3
Игорь Гефен. Igor Gefen канал. @GefenIgor · 1,375#92
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Коля Хадашот @gurevichonline · 41,943 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 29 August 2026
ЛИОРА ШВАРЦ @IsraelSuitcase · 21,228 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 September 2026
Марк Котлярский @markkot56 · 19,817 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 September 2026
Война и мир на Ближнем Востоке- Дина Лиснянская. @crescentscroissants · 55,070 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 August 2026
Фалафельная @mideastr · 20,993 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 September 2026
Борис и Лора из иврит-дозора |Израиль| @Godunov2020 · 21,474 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 September 2026
Дмитрий Дубов @dubovd · 38,609 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 31 August 2026
Дисперсия Каргинизма / Ближний Восток @karginizm · 38,129 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 31 August 2026
Макс Бродский - Мысли вслух - 🇮🇱 Новости Израиль | Ближний Восток @max_brodsky2 · 22,944 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 September 2026
Алексей Железнов: ЦАХАЛ/Израиль/Ближний Восток⚔️ @alexavni · 81,762 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 August 2026
Война с Ордой. Сергей Ауслендер @voinasordoy · 200,337 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 August 2026
Восточный Синдром @vostochnysyndrome · 83,061 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 18 August 2026
My Israel Today (Израиль сегодня) @israelparadoks · 23,590 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 17 September 2026
Пелливерт | Израиль | Политика @pellivert · 41,547 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 29 August 2026
Josef Alhazov/Джозеф Алхазов @josef_alhazov · 20,077 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 September 2026
Израиль для всех 🇮🇱 | Новости Израиля @israelforall · 25,017 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 September 2026
The Peacemaker @migdalsergei · 25,972 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 September 2026
ИнтеллиНьюз - Израиль и Ближний Восток. Все о безопасности @intellinews_russian · 60,468 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 22 August 2026
Исламизм от иноагента @irandezhurniy · 21,806 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 September 2026
Ezra Mor Youtube Show @EzraMorYoutubeShow · 29,264 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 September 2026
Записки артистки Цветаевой @zapiski_artistki_tsvetaevoy · 29,071 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 September 2026
Mignews.com - Новости Израиля / Война на Ближнем Востоке @mignewscom · 37,921 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 31 August 2026
Strana.co.il - Израиль 🇮🇱 Новости @stranacoil · 54,132 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 23 August 2026
Сегодня | Израиль @segodnyail · 55,429 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 64 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ближний В. (мои 5 агорот)” (@romanaboutmeast), 28,420 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/romanaboutmeast.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.