Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ДАНХАНА🇮🇱

Channel

ДАНХАНА🇮🇱

@danhana19

On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,278subscribers

-168 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002172681201
TypeChannel
Username@danhana19
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/danhana19

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

14,27814,44614,3627 August 2026 — 14,446 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,440 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,428 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,427 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,421 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,414 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,410 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,400 subscribers15 August 2026 — 14,391 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,377 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,373 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,367 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,360 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,356 subscribers22 August 2026 — 14,349 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,337 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,335 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,328 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,329 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,323 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,318 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,316 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,313 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,311 subscribers3 September 2026 — 14,305 subscribers5 September 2026 — 14,301 subscribers8 September 2026 — 14,293 subscribers11 September 2026 — 14,298 subscribers14 September 2026 — 14,294 subscribers16 September 2026 — 14,279 subscribers19 September 2026 — 14,278 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 43 days, net -168. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,253–14,471 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 08:1414,278-1
16 Sept 2026, 18:1814,279-15
14 Sept 2026, 19:0114,294-4
11 Sept 2026, 05:5814,298+5
8 Sept 2026, 11:5714,293-8
5 Sept 2026, 03:1714,301-4
3 Sept 2026, 05:5814,305-6
1 Sept 2026, 23:0514,311-2
31 Aug 2026, 21:0914,313-3
30 Aug 2026, 17:3814,316-2
29 Aug 2026, 15:4814,318-5
28 Aug 2026, 12:5214,323-6
27 Aug 2026, 15:3614,329+1
26 Aug 2026, 16:4214,328-7
25 Aug 2026, 17:1214,335-2
24 Aug 2026, 17:0714,337-12
22 Aug 2026, 22:3714,349-7
21 Aug 2026, 15:4614,356-4
20 Aug 2026, 14:5614,360-7
19 Aug 2026, 12:2714,367first reading

Engagement

286 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.78%
avg views ÷ 14,278 subscribers
Avg views / post
396
105 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.72%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
105
of 286 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held286 (6 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total41,618
Reactions total1,965
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 18:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
32m 15s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 78 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5,497 reactions across 286 posts, in 35 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,26923.1%
🤣1,26223.0%
😁58810.7%
🔥5089.24%
3045.53%
👏2494.53%
🤔2294.17%
🙏1713.11%
💯1653.00%
🤬1602.91%
🤯1011.84%
👀921.67%
😱811.47%
🫡591.07%
🥰450.819%
🍾400.728%
🤪290.528%
🤮250.455%
🤡220.4%
👎140.255%
15 further kinds841.53%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 286 of the 286 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,497 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 286 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 18:51 UTC1 views2 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Нетаниягу: "Если Иран решит напасть на нас, они должны знать, что это будет одно из последних их решений."

👏1😁1

Signed Dan Kuperstein🇮🇱

2 Sept 2026, 18:44 UTC50 views2 reactionsread 2 September 2026

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Трамп: Готов осуществить новую атаку на Иран. 🇺🇸🇮🇷 Трамп: Наша новая кампания против Ирана не продлится долго. Иран пытался создать ракету, способную сбрасывать мины в море, но мы этому помешали 🤔 .

🤔2

Signed Dan Kuperstein🇮🇱

2 Sept 2026, 18:41 UTC104 views4 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Завтра в районе территориальных бригад Эфраим и Менаше в Самарии, пройдут военные учения, которые продлятся с утра до полудня. В рамках учений будет наблюдаться активное перемещение сил безопасности в указанном районе. Опасности возникновения каких-либо инцидентов нет.🪖🫡

👍4

Signed Dan Kuperstein🇮🇱

2 Sept 2026, 15:36 UTC365 views16 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

А я напомню что : Греция приобретет у Израиля ракетную систему Пульс ( ЛААВ) за 650 миллионов евро€. И конечно системы ПВО за 3.5 миллиарда €. Системы,РЭБ, ракеты Спайк и много чего ещё 😎👍

🔥11👍3🥰2

Signed Dan Kuperstein🇮🇱

2 Sept 2026, 15:21 UTC385 views12 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

ЛОРА. По слухам её хотят купить и греки🇬🇷

👍12

Signed Dan Kuperstein🇮🇱

2 Sept 2026, 15:14 UTC157 views8 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @Israeli_WarfareVideo

Кошмар фюрера- евреи продали немцам ракеты😁 В ночь с 31 августа на 1 сентября 2026 года немецкий фрегат типа 🇩🇪F125 впервые провел испытания израильских баллистических ракет 🇮🇱LORA. Испытания проводились в Северной Атлантике, между Ирландией и Исландией, в рамках программы "Оперативные испытания" (OPEX) немецкого флота. Видеозаписи испытаний были опубликованы на официальной странице немецкого флота. Ракету LORA р

👍8

Signed Dan Kuperstein🇮🇱

2 Sept 2026, 15:01 UTC156 views11 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Офер Винтер "Сегодня вечером я сделаю важное заявление." На видео предыдущее заявление...

👀7🤔3🕊1

Signed Dan Kuperstein🇮🇱

2 Sept 2026, 14:38 UTC180 views14 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Тем временем, в Нетании: Бен-Гвир раздает свою детскую книгу. Что вообще происходит?😑

🤣7🔥5🥰2

Signed Dan Kuperstein🇮🇱

2 Sept 2026, 14:32 UTC187 views16 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Никакой мобилизации не будет , это чушь собачья. Когда я вас обманывал?😑

🤣12😁4

Signed Dan Kuperstein🇮🇱

2 Sept 2026, 14:25 UTC385 views22 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

В результате атаки БПЛА ВВС✈️ в секторе Газа, были ликвидированы Талаль Мустафа Бадауи и Муман Саид Мухаммед, террористы из внутренней безопасности военного крыла ХАМАСа.

👍12🔥6👏4

Signed Dan Kuperstein🇮🇱

2 Sept 2026, 14:12 UTC396 views18 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Сектор Газа больше не будет представлять угрозы для Израиля. Хотелось бы верить.

🙏94👍4👀1

Signed Dan Kuperstein🇮🇱

2 Sept 2026, 14:08 UTC192 views12 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Я сначала подумал ,что это новый комикс. СуперБен Гвир

😁9🔥3

Signed Dan Kuperstein🇮🇱

Showing the 12 most recent of 286 posts we hold for @danhana19. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

The Peacemaker
@migdalsergei · 26,081
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 September 2026
Израиль для всех 🇮🇱 | Новости Израиля
@israelforall · 25,171
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 September 2026
Борис и Лора из иврит-дозора |Израиль|
@Godunov2020 · 21,633
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 September 2026
Ближний В. (мои 5 агорот)
@romanaboutmeast · 28,514
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 9 September 2026
Стена плача
@western_wall · 28,887
Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ДАНХАНА🇮🇱” (@danhana19), 14,278 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/danhana19.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.