Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Fearless Report

Channel

Fearless Report

@FearlessReport

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

94,999subscribers

-4,847 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001294256027
TypeChannel
Username@FearlessReport
DescriptionFearless and Ready to Fight for Truth in Reporting — *We Are Not Afraid*
Created4 June 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 October 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/FearlessReport

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

94,99999,84697,422.56 August 2026 — 99,846 subscribers6 August 2026 — 99,818 subscribers7 August 2026 — 99,662 subscribers8 August 2026 — 99,619 subscribers10 August 2026 — 99,531 subscribers11 August 2026 — 99,361 subscribers11 August 2026 — 99,304 subscribers12 August 2026 — 99,279 subscribers14 August 2026 — 99,234 subscribers15 August 2026 — 99,070 subscribers16 August 2026 — 98,908 subscribers17 August 2026 — 98,828 subscribers18 August 2026 — 98,809 subscribers19 August 2026 — 98,724 subscribers20 August 2026 — 98,548 subscribers21 August 2026 — 98,452 subscribers23 August 2026 — 98,374 subscribers25 August 2026 — 98,223 subscribers26 August 2026 — 98,136 subscribers27 August 2026 — 98,099 subscribers28 August 2026 — 98,027 subscribers29 August 2026 — 97,891 subscribers30 August 2026 — 97,831 subscribers31 August 2026 — 97,753 subscribers1 September 2026 — 97,661 subscribers2 September 2026 — 97,595 subscribers3 September 2026 — 97,494 subscribers6 September 2026 — 97,313 subscribers9 September 2026 — 97,024 subscribers12 September 2026 — 96,809 subscribers13 September 2026 — 96,674 subscribers15 September 2026 — 96,514 subscribers17 September 2026 — 96,431 subscribers26 September 2026 — 95,693 subscribers4 October 2026 — 94,999 subscribers6 August 20264 October 2026
35 measurements spanning 59 days, net -4,847. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 94,272–100,573 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Oct 2026, 12:5894,999-694
26 Sept 2026, 04:3895,693-738
17 Sept 2026, 13:3896,431-83
15 Sept 2026, 13:4196,514-160
13 Sept 2026, 19:4196,674-135
12 Sept 2026, 00:1896,809-215
9 Sept 2026, 17:4197,024-289
6 Sept 2026, 07:1697,313-181
3 Sept 2026, 23:1897,494-101
2 Sept 2026, 11:3397,595-66
1 Sept 2026, 10:0797,661-92
31 Aug 2026, 08:4697,753-78
30 Aug 2026, 05:1897,831-60
29 Aug 2026, 03:3497,891-136
28 Aug 2026, 00:1698,027-72
27 Aug 2026, 00:4598,099-37
26 Aug 2026, 00:2398,136-87
25 Aug 2026, 01:2898,223-151
23 Aug 2026, 11:0398,374-78
21 Aug 2026, 21:5898,452first reading

Engagement

1,363 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 128 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.754%
avg views ÷ 94,999 subscribers
Avg views / post
716
747 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
747
of 1,363 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 741 of 747 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 October 2026
Posts held1,363 (5 August 2026 – 8 October 2026)
Views total534,878
Reactions total16,895
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Oct 2026, 01:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈203
Videos
≈76
Links
≈19,700

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

23,561 reactions across 987 posts, in 36 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3,77016.0%
🤬3,29614.0%
❤2,63811.2%
🖕1,8027.65%
💯1,7477.41%
👏1,4946.34%
🔥1,2745.41%
😈1,1815.01%
🙏1,1734.98%
🤔7563.21%
👎7533.20%
🤣7143.03%
🤮6852.91%
🤡5832.47%
😁3961.68%
💩3231.37%
🤯1980.84%
👀1640.696%
😡1080.458%
😢960.407%
16 further kinds4101.74%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 990 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23,561 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 26 August 2026 to 8 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Oct 2026, 00:53 UTC94 views5 reactionsread 8 October 2026

“The relative health of the Republican Party — at least in terms of party registration — is pretty gosh-darn good.” https://fearless.report/pqyw7d

👍4🤯1

8 Oct 2026, 00:25 UTC215 views3 reactionsread 8 October 2026

The Republican battling against Abdul El-Sayed just distanced himself from one of Trump’s main policies. https://fearless.report/ilsp6z

🤔3

7 Oct 2026, 23:57 UTC289 views17 reactionsread 8 October 2026

That makes two in a row for Alan Ritchson. https://fearless.report/xeacxk

❤12😁3🤡2

7 Oct 2026, 23:28 UTC354 views18 reactionsread 8 October 2026

“Americans deserve better than to have their hard-earned tax dollars used for Trump’s illegal schemes,” DNC Chair Ken Martin said. https://fearless.report/ntzocd

👎16❤1🖕1

7 Oct 2026, 23:00 UTC392 views10 reactionsread 8 October 2026

The amount of money spent by other countries on to influence America dwarfs AIPAC’s. But it’s not just other countries. Look what groups like the American Hospital Association and Meta/Facebook spend. It’s staggering compared to AIPAC. https://fearless.report/z446eu

❤9🤔1

7 Oct 2026, 21:35 UTC540 views14 reactionsread 8 October 2026

“That was a curse put on the city,” a pastor said after a shocking moment at a city council meeting. https://fearless.report/tz64d5

❤13🤬1

7 Oct 2026, 21:07 UTC527 views12 reactionsread 8 October 2026

“Why would his daughter post this?” https://fearless.report/3poufw

❤8😁3🤡1

7 Oct 2026, 20:38 UTC535 views20 reactionsread 8 October 2026

“We need to go out and get the perpetrators.” https://fearless.report/gsec3r

👍20

7 Oct 2026, 20:10 UTC572 views30 reactionsread 8 October 2026

“Absolutely disgusting and disgraceful.” https://fearless.report/s7lnom

😈22🖕7🤮1

7 Oct 2026, 19:42 UTC577 views28 reactionsread 8 October 2026

An ISIS-aligned Islamic radical was set to target the Mall of America. https://fearless.report/m8fm1a

🤬20💩4🖕3❤1

7 Oct 2026, 19:13 UTC602 views39 reactionsread 8 October 2026

What he said is absolutely going to be worse than what you imagine, even if you hate the man. https://fearless.report/2jns8a

🤬21💩9🖕8🔥1

7 Oct 2026, 18:45 UTC626 views19 reactionsread 8 October 2026

She died the way a star - or frankly, anyone who led as good a life as she did - should have. https://fearless.report/o4z1sg

🙏19

Showing the 12 most recent of 1,363 posts we hold for @FearlessReport. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Donald J. Trump
@real_donaldjtrump · 588,309
#1
BREAKING HEADLINES
@BREAKINGHEADLINES · 67,027
#2
Charlie Kirk
@CharlieKirk · 150,811
#3
James Woods ★★★
@JamesWoodsFans · 73,090
#4
Trump Supporters Channel 🇺🇸
@TrumpChannel · 132,824
#5
The American Tribune
@theamericantribune · 17,677
#6
One America News Network
@OANNTV · 143,248
#7
Donald Trump Jr
@TrumpJr · 353,392
#8
Resist the Mainstream
@ResisttheMainstream · 128,520
#9
Newsmax Clips
@NewsmaxTV · 64,943
#10
Gateway Pundit
@gatewaypunditofficial · 110,220
#11
Let’s Go Brandon (Official)
@LetsGoBrandon · 19,054
#12
Telegram Feed - PearFEED
@PearFEED · 40,735
#13
il Donaldo Trumpo
@RealDonaldoTrumpo · 155,315
#14
The General
@GeneralMCNews · 143,848
#15
Mark Levin Warroom
@MarkRLevin · 38,733
#16
X22 Report Official
@realx22report · 159,722
#17
The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@VigilantFox · 119,904
#18
Sergeant News Network 🇺🇸
@SGTnewsNetwork · 110,773
#19
Tucker Carlson Fanbase
@TuckerFans · 103,724
#20
The Federalist
@FDRLSTT · 24,131
#21
⚡️ 🇺🇸 Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 🗽
@SidneyPowell · 125,489
#22
America’s Doctors
@AmericasDoctors · 18,507
#23
GEORGENEWS
@georgenews · 143,009
#24
Benny Johnson
@BennyJohnson · 62,717
#25
Fighting The Commies
@FightingTheCommies · 22,924
#26
General Flynn ️
@RealGenFlynn · 147,715
#27
Q NEWS OFFICIAL #WWG1WGA 💛🇺🇸
@QNewsOfficialTV · 81,977
#28
Marjorie Taylor Greene
@RealMarjorieGreene · 56,994
#29
The Post Millennial
@ThePostMillennial · 19,238
#30
Glenn Beck Fans
@glennbeck · 36,655
#31
The Babylon Bee
@TheBabylonBee · 94,239
#32
Ben Shapiro Gang
@BenShapiroGang · 53,016
#33
Trending Politics
@trendingpolitics · 11,648
#34
Q) The Storm Rider /Official Page
@qthestormrider777 · 154,574
#35
BioClandestine
@bioclandestine · 138,411
#36
Taking Back America 🇺🇸
@TakingBackAmerica · 6,780
#37
Analyzing America
@analyzingamerica · 34,754
#38
KanekoaTheGreat
@KanekoaTheGreat · 116,144
#39
Julian Assange
@JulianAssangeWiki · 162,697
#40
John F. Kennedy Jr.
@JFK_Q17 · 104,416
#41
Dinesh D’Souza
@DineshJDSouza · 70,719
#42
𝗣𝗮𝘂𝗹 𝗙𝗹𝗲𝘂𝗿𝗲𝘁 (𝗔𝗯𝘀𝗼𝗹𝘂𝘁𝗲𝟭𝟳𝟳𝟲) ✝️🗽🇺🇸
@absolute1776 · 40,591
#43
DavidNinoRodriguez
@ninoscorner · 79,292
#44
Catturd Fan Club
@CatturdFanClub · 22,505
#45
Candace Owens On Fire🔥
@CandaceOnFire · 29,397
#46
Karoline Leavitt
@KarolineLeavitt · 5,884
#47
Steven Crowder Fans
@StevenCrowder · 50,160
#48
Jim Jordan
@JimJordanOH · 16,971
#49
Captain Keshel and Co. American Election Integrity HQ
@ElectionHQ2024 · 68,802
#50
Libs of TikTok Fans
@libsontiktok · 16,152
#51
Defy Cable News
@DefyCableNews · 9,581
#52
RTM News
@realRTMnews · 35,839
#53
Liz Harrington
@LizHarrington76 · 22,687
#54
David Avocado Wolfe
@davidavocadowolfe · 102,722
#55
The Epoch Times
@epochtimes · 126,893
#56
Dan Scavino FORCE🇺🇸🦅
@DanScavinoFORCE · 89,450
#57
Jack Posobiec
@Jack_Posobiec · 116,264
#58
NTD
@NTDNews · 52,888
#59
Dan Bongino
@DBongino · 105,522
#60
The Western Journal
@WesternJournal · 50,527
#61
We The Media
@WeTheMedia · 142,175
#62
Disclose.tv
@disclosetv · 320,889
#63
WarRoom: Official Telegram Channel
@BannonWarRoom · 51,716
#64
Insider Paper
@insiderpaper · 108,305
#65
ULTRA Pepe Lives Matter 🐸
@PepeMatter · 145,499
#66
James O'Keefe
@JamesOKeefeIII · 165,511
#67
Jesse Watters ★★★
@JessePrimetime · 5,420
#68
Project Veritas
@project_veritas · 204,379
#69
loop_rm_3117211
@looP_rM_3117211 · 291
#70
Based Rand Paul ★★★
@BasedRandPaul · 4,157
#71
Shadow of Ezra
@ShadowofEzra · 146,292
#72
SantaSurfing
@SantaSurfing · 123,248
#73
Police frequency
@police_frequency · 69,728
#74
Turning Point USA
@TPUSA · 46,625
#75
Independent Journal Review
@theijr · 9,033
#76
Raheem Kassam
@RaheemKassam · 7,735
#77
The Justice League
@THEREALTORIABROOKE · 26,898
#78
Josh Hawley
@Josh_Hawley · 25,936
#79
Ted Cruz
@TedCruzTX · 27,932
#80
Follow The White Rabbit ™ 🐇
@followsthewhiterabbit · 79,509
#81
The American Spectator
@AmericanSpectator · 42,626
#82
Amir Tsarfati
@beholdisraelchannel · 566,856
#83
Right Side Broadcasting Network (RSBN)
@rsbnetwork · 102,160
#84
Mike Lindell
@MichaelJLindell · 78,407
#85
Andy Ngo (Official)
@Andy_Ngo · 34,161
#86

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Sarah Huckabee Sanders
@SarahHuckabee · 23,728
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 16 September 2026
Mark Levin Warroom
@MarkRLevin · 38,733
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 August 2026
Mike Pompeo
@MichaelRPompeo · 24,326
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 15 September 2026
Analyzing America
@analyzingamerica · 34,754
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026
James Woods ★★★
@JamesWoodsFans · 73,090
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
Ben Shapiro Gang
@BenShapiroGang · 53,016
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 August 2026
Daily Caller
@Daily_Caller · 28,535
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 8 September 2026
Telegram Feed - PearFEED
@PearFEED · 40,735
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 29 August 2026
Candace Owens On Fire🔥
@CandaceOnFire · 29,397
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 7 September 2026
Glenn Beck Fans
@glennbeck · 36,655
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 1 September 2026
Let’s Go Brandon (Official)
@LetsGoBrandon · 19,054
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 3 October 2026
Fighting The Commies
@FightingTheCommies · 22,924
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 September 2026
Newsmax Clips
@NewsmaxTV · 64,943
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 August 2026
Trump Supporters Channel 🇺🇸
@TrumpChannel · 132,824
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 August 2026
Steven Crowder Fans
@StevenCrowder · 50,160
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 August 2026
Charlie Kirk
@CharlieKirk · 150,811
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
BREAKING HEADLINES
@BREAKINGHEADLINES · 67,027
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
⚡️ 🇺🇸 Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 🗽
@SidneyPowell · 125,489
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026
Donald J. Trump
@real_donaldjtrump · 588,309
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 August 2026
Dinesh D’Souza
@DineshJDSouza · 70,719
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
Donald Trump Jr
@TrumpJr · 353,392
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 August 2026
Catturd Fan Club
@CatturdFanClub · 22,505
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 September 2026
The Federalist
@FDRLSTT · 24,131
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 September 2026
Becker News
@beckernews · 27,945
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 9 September 2026

This channel appears in 49 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Fearless Report” (@FearlessReport), 94,999 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FearlessReport.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.