Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Jim Jordan

Channel

Jim Jordan

@JimJordanOH

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,201subscribers

-569 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001286910958
TypeChannel
Username@JimJordanOH
Created8 March 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/JimJordanOH

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

17,20117,77017,485.56 August 2026 — 17,770 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,752 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,740 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,728 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,718 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,691 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,679 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,675 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,661 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,629 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,607 subscribers18 August 2026 — 17,600 subscribers19 August 2026 — 17,586 subscribers20 August 2026 — 17,561 subscribers21 August 2026 — 17,552 subscribers22 August 2026 — 17,541 subscribers24 August 2026 — 17,532 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,521 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,513 subscribers27 August 2026 — 17,506 subscribers28 August 2026 — 17,492 subscribers29 August 2026 — 17,474 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,459 subscribers31 August 2026 — 17,450 subscribers1 September 2026 — 17,432 subscribers2 September 2026 — 17,415 subscribers4 September 2026 — 17,404 subscribers7 September 2026 — 17,360 subscribers10 September 2026 — 17,314 subscribers12 September 2026 — 17,277 subscribers14 September 2026 — 17,261 subscribers15 September 2026 — 17,232 subscribers17 September 2026 — 17,201 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net -569. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,116–17,855 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 21:1917,201-31
15 Sept 2026, 19:5517,232-29
14 Sept 2026, 02:3817,261-16
12 Sept 2026, 12:2117,277-37
10 Sept 2026, 09:5517,314-46
7 Sept 2026, 03:1817,360-44
4 Sept 2026, 08:4017,404-11
2 Sept 2026, 19:1817,415-17
1 Sept 2026, 16:2517,432-18
31 Aug 2026, 17:2617,450-9
30 Aug 2026, 15:1317,459-15
29 Aug 2026, 11:4417,474-18
28 Aug 2026, 10:0317,492-14
27 Aug 2026, 11:3317,506-7
26 Aug 2026, 08:3317,513-8
25 Aug 2026, 10:3317,521-11
24 Aug 2026, 13:4917,532-9
22 Aug 2026, 23:1517,541-11
21 Aug 2026, 15:1817,552-9
20 Aug 2026, 16:1317,561first reading

Engagement

56 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.67%
avg views ÷ 17,201 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,320
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.64%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 56 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held56 (27 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total29,012
Reactions total1,926
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 09:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
45m 30s
Average length
6m 30s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

6,508 reactions across 56 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6,508100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 56 of the 56 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,508 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 21:23 UTC742 views59 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Jim Jordan demands FBI Round River docs after memos reveal targeting of Trump officials, allies https://justthenews.com/government/congress/emb3pm-jordan-demands-fbi-round-river-docs-after-memos-show-targeting-trump @JimJordanOH

59

2 Sept 2026, 18:10 UTC851 views63 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Chairman Jordan Exposes The Democrats' Immigration Plan https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pZKJsvNtzy0

63

2 Sept 2026, 17:40 UTC824 views65 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Chairman Jim Jordan's Floor Speech on Keeping SCOTUS at 9 Justices https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tk0s84PbhA0

65

2 Sept 2026, 17:30 UTC860 views58 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Chairman Jim Jordan Questioning at Hearing on Sanctuary Policies, Tragic Consequences https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b5Jd04U3OOI

58

2 Sept 2026, 17:30 UTC670 views50 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Chairman Jordan: Sanctuary Jurisdictions Ignore ICE Detainer Requests and Jeopardize American Lives https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8fBBKS4sFcM

50

2 Sept 2026, 17:26 UTC855 views48 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

https://x.com/Jim_Jordan/status/2095198061697909214/video/1 @JimJordanOH

48

1 Sept 2026, 22:04 UTC≈1,030 views75 reactionsread 3 September 2026

House Republicans press for details on investigation of Atlanta federal judge https://www.ajc.com/news/2026/09/house-republicans-press-for-details-on-investigation-of-atlanta-federal-judge/ @JimJordanOH

75

1 Sept 2026, 21:50 UTC≈1,130 views74 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Chairman Jim Jordan Warns About the New Democrat Party https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BIAGTbsLdeA

74

1 Sept 2026, 20:19 UTC≈1,740 views71 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

https://x.com/Jim_Jordan/status/2094876363039617337/video/1 @JimJordanOH

71

1 Sept 2026, 17:40 UTC≈1,010 views83 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Rep. Jim Jordan: Democrats Don't Just Want to Pack the Court, They Want to Abolish it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tguy-wSKVhk

83

1 Sept 2026, 16:48 UTC≈1,180 views91 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Maryland is trying to stop their sheriffs from working with ICE after arresting dangerous CRIMINAL aliens. Why is Maryland making it harder for law enforcement to protect Americans? @JimJordanOH

91

1 Sept 2026, 14:36 UTC≈1,240 views68 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

https://x.com/Jim_Jordan/status/2094795345481912799/video/1 @JimJordanOH

68

Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @JimJordanOH. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Ted Cruz
@TedCruzTX · 28,337
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
Daily Caller
@Daily_Caller · 28,872
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 8 September 2026
Sarah Huckabee Sanders
@SarahHuckabee · 24,122
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 16 September 2026
Josh Hawley
@Josh_Hawley · 26,289
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 12 September 2026
Mark Levin Warroom
@MarkRLevin · 39,260
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 August 2026
Marjorie Taylor Greene
@RealMarjorieGreene · 57,874
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
James Woods ★★★
@JamesWoodsFans · 73,968
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
Ben Shapiro Gang
@BenShapiroGang · 53,619
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 August 2026
Matt Gaetz
@MattGaetzOfficial · 30,200
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 7 September 2026
Telegram Feed - PearFEED
@PearFEED · 41,322
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 29 August 2026
Steven Crowder Fans
@StevenCrowder · 50,783
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 August 2026
Fearless Report
@FearlessReport · 96,431
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 16 August 2026
The Federalist
@FDRLSTT · 24,519
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 September 2026
Catturd Fan Club
@CatturdFanClub · 22,789
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 September 2026
Candace Owens On Fire🔥
@CandaceOnFire · 29,790
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 7 September 2026
Glenn Beck Fans
@glennbeck · 36,987
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 1 September 2026
The American Spectator
@AmericanSpectator · 43,073
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Jim Jordan” (@JimJordanOH), 17,201 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JimJordanOH.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.