DNC chairman says ‘big tent’ approach in midterm sweep could fuel 2028 gains https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/campaigns/congressional/4792952/dnc-chairman-big-tent-approach-maintain-momentum-post-midterm-sweep-2028/

Channel
Washington Examiner
@Washington_Examiner
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,637subscribers
-623 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001470557935 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Washington_Examiner |
| Description | Political news and commentary from the Washington Examiner. https://washingtonexaminer.com |
| Created | 27 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 43 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Washington_Examiner |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 09:46 | 9,637 | -7 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 17:19 | 9,644 | -18 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 02:30 | 9,662 | -22 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 16:47 | 9,684 | -27 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 18:16 | 9,711 | -20 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 00:09 | 9,731 | -10 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 08:37 | 9,741 | -18 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 09:10 | 9,759 | -19 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 22:22 | 9,778 | -29 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 18:57 | 9,807 | -62 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 09:55 | 9,869 | -69 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 19:00 | 9,938 | -35 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 05:19 | 9,973 | -24 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 17:21 | 9,997 | -23 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 16:37 | 10,020 | -23 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 21:20 | 10,043 | -21 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 06:18 | 10,064 | -6 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:36 | 10,070 | -5 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:25 | 10,075 | -8 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:26 | 10,083 | first reading |
Engagement
682 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 41 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.247%
- avg views ÷ 9,637 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 23.8
- 80 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 80
- of 682 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 682 (5 August 2026 – 4 November 2026) |
| Views total | 1,901 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Nov 2026, 20:53 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈17
- Videos
- ≈8
- Links
- ≈85,100
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 80 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
How Adam Hamawy went from terrorism trial witness to congressman-elect https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/campaigns/congressional/4789550/how-adam-hamawy-went-from-terrorism-trial-witness-to-congressman-elect/
Chuck Grassley, 93, won’t step down early after Democrat Rob Sand wins Iowa governorship https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/senate/4792779/chuck-grassley-wont-retire-early-rob-sand-iowa-gubernatorial-win/
More than a thumping, possibly a realignment https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columnists/4792614/more-than-a-thumping-possibly-a-realignment/
Trump says he’s not sure if Vance will run for president in 2028 https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/campaigns/presidential/4792713/trump-vance-midterm-elections-2028-president/
Trump needs his own surge in Iran after midterm ‘thumpin’’ https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/in_focus/4792725/trump-needs-his-own-iran-surge/
Tom Suozzi beats Mike LiPetri in Long Island House seat https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/campaigns/congressional/4786720/rep-tom-suozzi-beat-mike-lipetri-2026-ny-3rd-district-results/
Trump will ‘stay out’ of race to succeed Mike Johnson as House GOP leader https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/house/4792691/trump-johnson-house-gop-leader-jordan-scalise/
John Cornyn tears into GOP’s ‘unforced political errors’ in post-midterm criticism https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/senate/4792750/john-cornyn-gop-unforced-political-errors/
Progressive William Lawrence unseats Tom Barrett in Michigan https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/campaigns/congressional/4771367/william-lawrence-tom-barrett-michigan/
Trump ‘not at all’ worried about impeachment despite Democrats retaking Congress https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/white-house/4792776/trump-not-at-all-worried-about-impeachment-despite-democrats-retaking-congress/
Jeffries says not ‘a single member’ has talked to him about impeachment https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/house/4792651/jeffries-not-a-single-member-talked-about-impeachment/
Showing the 12 most recent of 682 posts we hold for @Washington_Examiner. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@TedCruzTX · 27,347
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
@FDRLSTT · 23,685
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 September 2026
@NTDNews · 51,955
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 August 2026
@ThePostMillennial · 18,902
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 October 2026
@Daily_Caller · 28,001
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 8 September 2026
@FightingTheCommies · 22,559
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 September 2026
@BenShapiroGang · 51,956
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 August 2026
@SarahHuckabee · 23,247
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 16 September 2026
@realDailyWire · 37,893
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 August 2026
@Andy_Ngo · 33,574
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 2 September 2026
@AmericanSpectator · 41,890
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 August 2026
@TPUSA · 45,977
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 August 2026
@NewsmaxTV · 63,705
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 August 2026
@StevenCrowder · 49,098
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Washington Examiner” (@Washington_Examiner), 9,637 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Washington_Examiner.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.