Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Washington Examiner

Channel

Washington Examiner

@Washington_Examiner

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,637subscribers

-623 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001470557935
TypeChannel
Username@Washington_Examiner
DescriptionPolitical news and commentary from the Washington Examiner. https://washingtonexaminer.com
Created27 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held43
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Washington_Examiner

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

9,63710,2609,948.56 August 2026 — 10,260 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,260 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,259 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,242 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,238 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,229 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,223 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,217 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,213 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,201 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,190 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,176 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,174 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,168 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,152 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,144 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,130 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,120 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,115 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,107 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,100 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,088 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,087 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,083 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,075 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,070 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,064 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,043 subscribers7 September 2026 — 10,020 subscribers10 September 2026 — 9,997 subscribers14 September 2026 — 9,973 subscribers18 September 2026 — 9,938 subscribers28 September 2026 — 9,869 subscribers5 October 2026 — 9,807 subscribers11 October 2026 — 9,778 subscribers15 October 2026 — 9,759 subscribers18 October 2026 — 9,741 subscribers21 October 2026 — 9,731 subscribers23 October 2026 — 9,711 subscribers26 October 2026 — 9,684 subscribers30 October 2026 — 9,662 subscribers1 November 2026 — 9,644 subscribers4 November 2026 — 9,637 subscribers6 August 20264 November 2026
43 measurements spanning 90 days, net -623. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,544–10,353 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 43
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 09:469,637-7
1 Nov 2026, 17:199,644-18
30 Oct 2026, 02:309,662-22
26 Oct 2026, 16:479,684-27
23 Oct 2026, 18:169,711-20
21 Oct 2026, 00:099,731-10
18 Oct 2026, 08:379,741-18
15 Oct 2026, 09:109,759-19
11 Oct 2026, 22:229,778-29
5 Oct 2026, 18:579,807-62
28 Sept 2026, 09:559,869-69
18 Sept 2026, 19:009,938-35
14 Sept 2026, 05:199,973-24
10 Sept 2026, 17:219,997-23
7 Sept 2026, 16:3710,020-23
4 Sept 2026, 21:2010,043-21
3 Sept 2026, 06:1810,064-6
1 Sept 2026, 23:3610,070-5
1 Sept 2026, 02:2510,075-8
31 Aug 2026, 00:2610,083first reading

Engagement

682 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 41 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.247%
avg views ÷ 9,637 subscribers
Avg views / post
23.8
80 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
80
of 682 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held682 (5 August 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total1,901
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 20:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈17
Videos
≈8
Links
≈85,100

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 80 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 20:48 UTC3 viewsread 4 November 2026

DNC chairman says ‘big tent’ approach in midterm sweep could fuel 2028 gains https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/campaigns/congressional/4792952/dnc-chairman-big-tent-approach-maintain-momentum-post-midterm-sweep-2028/

4 Nov 2026, 20:43 UTC7 viewsread 4 November 2026

How Adam Hamawy went from terrorism trial witness to congressman-elect https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/campaigns/congressional/4789550/how-adam-hamawy-went-from-terrorism-trial-witness-to-congressman-elect/

4 Nov 2026, 20:33 UTC12 viewsread 4 November 2026

Chuck Grassley, 93, won’t step down early after Democrat Rob Sand wins Iowa governorship https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/senate/4792779/chuck-grassley-wont-retire-early-rob-sand-iowa-gubernatorial-win/

4 Nov 2026, 19:58 UTC25 viewsread 4 November 2026

More than a thumping, possibly a realignment https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columnists/4792614/more-than-a-thumping-possibly-a-realignment/

4 Nov 2026, 19:58 UTC22 viewsread 4 November 2026

Trump says he’s not sure if Vance will run for president in 2028 https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/campaigns/presidential/4792713/trump-vance-midterm-elections-2028-president/

4 Nov 2026, 19:58 UTC20 viewsread 4 November 2026

Trump needs his own surge in Iran after midterm ‘thumpin’’ https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/in_focus/4792725/trump-needs-his-own-iran-surge/

4 Nov 2026, 19:48 UTC19 viewsread 4 November 2026

Tom Suozzi beats Mike LiPetri in Long Island House seat https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/campaigns/congressional/4786720/rep-tom-suozzi-beat-mike-lipetri-2026-ny-3rd-district-results/

4 Nov 2026, 19:43 UTC22 viewsread 4 November 2026

Trump will ‘stay out’ of race to succeed Mike Johnson as House GOP leader https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/house/4792691/trump-johnson-house-gop-leader-jordan-scalise/

4 Nov 2026, 19:43 UTC22 viewsread 4 November 2026

John Cornyn tears into GOP’s ‘unforced political errors’ in post-midterm criticism https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/senate/4792750/john-cornyn-gop-unforced-political-errors/

4 Nov 2026, 19:38 UTC22 viewsread 4 November 2026

Progressive William Lawrence unseats Tom Barrett in Michigan https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/campaigns/congressional/4771367/william-lawrence-tom-barrett-michigan/

4 Nov 2026, 19:28 UTC28 viewsread 4 November 2026

Trump ‘not at all’ worried about impeachment despite Democrats retaking Congress https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/white-house/4792776/trump-not-at-all-worried-about-impeachment-despite-democrats-retaking-congress/

4 Nov 2026, 19:23 UTC22 viewsread 4 November 2026

Jeffries says not ‘a single member’ has talked to him about impeachment https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/house/4792651/jeffries-not-a-single-member-talked-about-impeachment/

Showing the 12 most recent of 682 posts we hold for @Washington_Examiner. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Ted Cruz
@TedCruzTX · 27,347
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
The Federalist
@FDRLSTT · 23,685
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 September 2026
NTD
@NTDNews · 51,955
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 August 2026
The Post Millennial
@ThePostMillennial · 18,902
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 October 2026
Daily Caller
@Daily_Caller · 28,001
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 8 September 2026
Fighting The Commies
@FightingTheCommies · 22,559
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 September 2026
Ben Shapiro Gang
@BenShapiroGang · 51,956
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 August 2026
Sarah Huckabee Sanders
@SarahHuckabee · 23,247
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 16 September 2026
Daily Wire Junkies
@realDailyWire · 37,893
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 August 2026
Andy Ngo (Official)
@Andy_Ngo · 33,574
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 2 September 2026
The American Spectator
@AmericanSpectator · 41,890
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 August 2026
Turning Point USA
@TPUSA · 45,977
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 August 2026
Newsmax Clips
@NewsmaxTV · 63,705
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 August 2026
Steven Crowder Fans
@StevenCrowder · 49,098
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Washington Examiner” (@Washington_Examiner), 9,637 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Washington_Examiner.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.