Channel
@Julie_Kelly2
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,298subscribers
-26 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001743925219 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Julie_Kelly2 |
| Created | 14 December 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Julie_Kelly2 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 15:36 | 2,298 | -6 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:07 | 2,304 | -4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:05 | 2,308 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 2,309 | -3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 02:55 | 2,312 | -2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 04:55 | 2,314 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:15 | 2,315 | -5 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:43 | 2,320 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:41 | 2,322 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:50 | 2,324 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 2,324 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
709 reactions across 16 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 196 | 27.6% | |
| 👍 | 127 | 17.9% | |
| 🔥 | 96 | 13.5% | |
| 🤬 | 73 | 10.3% | |
| 👏 | 64 | 9.03% | |
| 🤡 | 42 | 5.92% | |
| 💯 | 36 | 5.08% | |
| 💩 | 27 | 3.81% | |
| 🤮 | 14 | 1.97% | |
| 😁 | 8 | 1.13% | |
| 🥱 | 8 | 1.13% | |
| 🙏 | 6 | 0.846% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 0.423% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 0.282% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 0.282% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 0.141% | |
| 😡 | 1 | 0.141% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.141% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.141% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.141% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 782 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Lil Mikey Romano is at it again—this time by participating in a post-judicial confirmation hearing presser yesterday. Romano—who spent most of his time as a J6 prosecutor trying misdemeanor cases such as trespassing and “parading” in the Capitol—lies about Jan 6 (“install” President Trump??”) but again reveals his partisan bias and the vengeful nature of the J6 prosecution. Biden DOJ got 1,200 convictions? What Rom…
🤡23🤬15✍1👍1
Dumb and dumber @Julie_Kelly2
❤21👍11🤮4
These blockheads must pay a price for blocking Todd Blanche's confirmation. I have no idea how Cornyn and Tillis ever got elected. The US Senate--and the country--will be so much better without them. But the administration needs a plan to punish the lobbying firm, corporation, or law firm that hires either one of them. @Julie_Kelly2
👍40💯20🔥3😡1
Flashback to when John Cornyn gave a full throated endorsement of Merrick Garland so he could "depoliticize" the DOJ 😂 @Julie_Kelly2
🤬48🤡14😁4👍1
I wish someone had shown me this years ago... 🌿📖 Thousands of people swear by Barbara O'Neill's natural wellness advice—and after flipping through this book, it's easy to see why. One chapter in, and you'll understand why so many families keep Barbara O'Neill's books on their shelves. Learn how to heal without chemicals. Free Shipping Worldwide - Order Now👇💚 https://tinyurl.com/sustain-me https://tinyurl.com/susta…
“By the book.” Carr worked on a sweeping and destructive investigation into nonexistent Trump-Russia election collusion. Then he worked on criminal investigations into Trump for giving a speech and taking his own presidential papers home with him. The same special counsel whose appointment violated the Constitution. Good riddance to Carr and the nearly 10,000 DOJ employees just like him. @Julie_Kelly2
👏44❤6❤🔥3👍2💯2🤮2😢1😭1
Dude who acted as Garland/Monaco DOJ mouthpiece during criminal investigations into the president and J6ers AND who served as spox for both Robert Mueller and Jack Smith is flabbergasted he got axed by Todd Blanche. The DOJ has been filled with these sanctimonious drama queens. @Julie_Kelly2
❤40🤮8👏6👍4😭1
Judge Flo Pan--a Biden appointee who should recuse from all political cases since her husband runs a left-leaning nonprofit in DC currently fighting the Trump administration related to workforce reductions--disagreed, says Biden is entitled to privacy in the matter. Keep in mind, Pan denied President Trump all categories of presidential immunity in Jack Smith's J6 indictment in 2024: @Julie_Kelly2
💩27🤬8🔥3❤1🤔1
Biden argued the transcript and recordings are not FOIAable because it was the product of a criminal investigation and consists of law enforcement records. Biden also claimed he has a privacy interest in protecting his voice from the public - LOL. Panel: "The public has a 'weighty' and 'significant' interest in 'shining a light' on the Special Counsel’s investigation of a former Vice President for alleged mishandl…
❤18💯8👍2🤣2🔥1
A split panel of DC appellate court denied Joe Biden's emergency request to stop the disclosure of unredacted transcripts of his interviews with ghostwriter Mark Zwonitzer. A DC district court judge denied Biden's initial request to prohibit the disclosure; Biden's lawyers, including Amy Jeffress, wife of DC District Court Judge Chris Cooper, are appealing the ruling. But it doesn't appear Biden will be successful. …
❤21👍8🙏6👏2🔥1
Subject: Zombie Teeth? This Red Foam Brings Them Back to Life Hey, Look in the mirror. Go ahead, I'll wait... Do your teeth look more like a zombie's than a movie star's? Yellow, cracking, bleeding gums, maybe even feeling loose? If you're nodding yes, you're experiencing what I call "Zombie Mouth Syndrome"... Your teeth are literally DYING while still in your mouth. And here's the horrifying part: Regular toothpa…
❤2👍1🔥1
Reposting my May 2024 piece on investigating Jack Smith https://www.declassified.live/p/defund-jack-smith-then-investigate @Julie_Kelly2
🔥36👏3❤2🤝1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Julie_Kelly2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Julie Kelly 🇺🇲” (@Julie_Kelly2), 2,298 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Julie_Kelly2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.