Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
60 measurements spanning 92 days, net -4,556. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 94,978–100,900 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 12:28
95,661
-49
5 Nov 2026, 14:35
95,710
-74
4 Nov 2026, 15:46
95,784
-18
3 Nov 2026, 14:26
95,802
-52
2 Nov 2026, 16:06
95,854
-4
1 Nov 2026, 19:20
95,858
-37
31 Oct 2026, 18:38
95,895
-18
30 Oct 2026, 19:19
95,913
-52
29 Oct 2026, 15:45
95,965
-59
28 Oct 2026, 17:54
96,024
-52
27 Oct 2026, 14:30
96,076
-36
26 Oct 2026, 15:16
96,112
-50
25 Oct 2026, 13:27
96,162
-62
24 Oct 2026, 10:17
96,224
-40
23 Oct 2026, 07:00
96,264
-56
22 Oct 2026, 06:38
96,320
-49
20 Oct 2026, 21:18
96,369
-19
19 Oct 2026, 21:45
96,388
-67
18 Oct 2026, 18:18
96,455
-51
17 Oct 2026, 20:11
96,506
first reading
Engagement
105 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 187 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.9%
avg views ÷ 95,661 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,400
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.13%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 105 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
105 (6 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
216,670
Reactions total
6,778
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 18:19 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,240
Videos
≈1,240
Links
≈4,880
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
9h 40m
Average length
44m 39s
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
28,350 reactions across 92 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
13,638
48.1%
🙏
8,938
31.5%
👍
2,264
7.99%
🎉
1,221
4.31%
❤🔥
564
1.99%
🔥
531
1.87%
😁
296
1.04%
💯
209
0.737%
⚡
171
0.603%
😱
135
0.476%
🏆
106
0.374%
🤣
100
0.353%
🕊
53
0.187%
👌
45
0.159%
🤩
31
0.109%
🤯
15
0.053%
🤔
11
0.039%
🍾
7
0.025%
😍
6
0.021%
🤨
4
0.014%
3 further kinds
5
0.018%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 92 of the 105 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28,350 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 105 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 23 posts held from the last 30 days (21.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Email Testimony
Dear Praying Medic,
I am thankful for your YouTube videos and teachings on healing and gifts of the spirit. In 2016 I believe I had a quite severe depressive episode. I was signed off my university course for a couple of months. I started digging around the internet and searching through scriptures to learn about healing and the working of miracles. I found your channel and would listen to a lot of …
X Testimony
From: Jan
Using advice from your book, I outed spirit causing my Achilles tendonitis. Went from wheelchair to walking and not needing the boot orthopedic doc at Andrews gave me.
Thank you!
Thank God. 🙏🏻🔔
Email Testimony
Thank you! Last night her report noted many tumors. She went for additional testing today. Tonight, the CT and MRI report showed she was clear. There is nothing on her pancreas or small bowel…absolute no tumors. They just received that news a little bit ago. God is so good. I know you’ve prayed for so many and have shared that they were healed from tumors as well. We’ve definitely received a miracle …
Email Testimony
A shout-out to you (well, to God). I was praying for someone that was going for a biopsy on her back the following week. While praying for her, I said "I speak death to cancer cells in Jesus' name" like you do. Time slowed down and seemed to stop momentarily. The next week she went in and there was nothing to biopsy!! Thanks for teaching me that through your podcasts.
Have a wonderful day, and thank…
Email Testimony
Hello Dave,
I wanted to let you know that I prayed over my cousin who had a blister like rash for a few months, below her nose. The next day, she was healed! Praise God!
I will not stop praying for healing, have a little more confidence now!
Thank you for all you do!
God bless,
Cheryl
Email Testimony
From: ES
Hello Dave,
I just wanted to let you know I thoroughly enjoyed the Healing and Miracles for Animals video. It has really boosted my faith and my interest in healing miracles.
I have tried the penny on the wall thing for several years and have never gotten it to stay...but I prayed over my #1 cat who is older with hip displacement/limping etc. I prayed over her 2 times and noticed she didn'…
Email Testimony
Dave,
I originally contacted you August 31 to ask for your prayers and a link to your healing videos. This was to focus on my right eye that has a membrane on the retina.
Since that time I have listened to your healing video sometimes three times a day, but on average once a day. I also stop and pray for my healing at least an additional two times a day. I picked the nervous system prayer since it …
Showing the 12 most recent of 105 posts we hold for @praying_medic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@praying_medic edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
3 September 2026
Most recent edit
3 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Julie Green Ministries @JULIEGREENMINISTRIES · 52,695 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 24 August 2026
Praying Medic News @PrayingMedicNews · 24,061 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 16 September 2026
Prophecies Fulfilled @PropheciesFulfilled · 34,182 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 2 September 2026
✞ Dr C ✞ @InevitableET · 37,735 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 31 August 2026
Christiane Northrup M.D @drchristianenorthrup · 41,017 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 29 August 2026
And We Know® @andweknowLT · 84,532 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 17 August 2026
The American Sovereign @TheAmericanSovereign · 30,304 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 6 September 2026
Tracy Beanz @TracybeanzOfficial · 25,887 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 September 2026
Patriot Streetfighter @patriotstreetfighter · 70,202 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 19 August 2026
Official RedPill78 Channel @OfficialRedPillNews · 34,199 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 2 September 2026
Ryan Fournier @RyanAFournier · 19,765 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 September 2026
Wendy Rogers @wendyrogersaz · 44,466 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 27 August 2026
General Flynn ️ @RealGenFlynn · 145,303 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 August 2026
⚡️ 🇺🇸 Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 🗽 @SidneyPowell · 123,004 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026
Patton6966 @patton6966 · 25,575 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 12 September 2026
Mike Lindell @MichaelJLindell · 76,933 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
Dr. Simone Gold @DrSimoneGold · 79,106 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 August 2026
Captain Keshel and Co. American Election Integrity HQ @ElectionHQ2024 · 67,751 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 20 August 2026
James O'Keefe @JamesOKeefeIII · 162,691 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
Jonathan Otto - Health Secret @jonathanottohealth · 28,784 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 8 September 2026
Just Human ⭐️⭐️⭐️ @realjust_human · 30,069 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 6 September 2026
Kari Lake @realKariLake · 21,419 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 21 September 2026
StormyPatriotJoe ⭐️⭐️⭐️ Channel @stormypatriotjoe21 · 71,863 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 23 August 2026
David Clements @theprofessorsrecord · 49,728 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 58 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Praying Medic” (@praying_medic), 95,661 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/praying_medic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.